Kylie J Hollitt, Steven Milanese, Majo Joseph, Rebecca Perry
{"title":"Can automation and artificial intelligence reduce echocardiography scan time and ultrasound system interaction?","authors":"Kylie J Hollitt, Steven Milanese, Majo Joseph, Rebecca Perry","doi":"10.1186/s44156-025-00077-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of patients referred for and requiring a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) has increased over the years resulting in more cardiac sonographers reporting work related musculoskeletal pain. We sought to determine if a scanning protocol that replaced conventional workflows with advanced technologies such as multiplane imaging, artificial intelligence (AI) and automation could be used to optimise conventional workflows and potentially reduce ergonomic risk for cardiac sonographers. The aim was to assess whether this alternate protocol could reduce active scanning time as well as interaction with the ultrasound machine compared to a standard echocardiogram without a reduction in image quality and interpretability.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>Volunteer participants were recruited for a study that comprised of two TTE's with separate protocols. Both were clinically complete, but Protocol A combined automation, AI assisted acquisition and measurement, simultaneous and multiplane imaging whilst Protocol B reflected a standard scanning protocol without these additional technologies. Keystrokes were significantly reduced with the advanced protocol as compared to the typical protocol (230.9 ± 24.2 vs. 502.8 ± 56.2; difference 271.9 ± 61.3, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a reduction in scan time with protocol A compared to protocol B the standard TTE protocol (13.4 ± 2.3 min vs. 18.0 ± 2.6 min; difference 4.6 ± 2.9 min, p < 0.001) as well as a decrease of approximately 27% in the time the sonographers were required to reach beyond a neutral position on the ultrasound console.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A TTE protocol that embraces modern technologies such as AI, automation, and multiplane imaging shows potential for a reduction in ultrasound keystrokes and scan time without a reduction in quality and interpretability. This may aid a reduction in ergonomic workload as compared to a standard TTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echo Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44156-025-00077-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The number of patients referred for and requiring a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) has increased over the years resulting in more cardiac sonographers reporting work related musculoskeletal pain. We sought to determine if a scanning protocol that replaced conventional workflows with advanced technologies such as multiplane imaging, artificial intelligence (AI) and automation could be used to optimise conventional workflows and potentially reduce ergonomic risk for cardiac sonographers. The aim was to assess whether this alternate protocol could reduce active scanning time as well as interaction with the ultrasound machine compared to a standard echocardiogram without a reduction in image quality and interpretability.
Method and results: Volunteer participants were recruited for a study that comprised of two TTE's with separate protocols. Both were clinically complete, but Protocol A combined automation, AI assisted acquisition and measurement, simultaneous and multiplane imaging whilst Protocol B reflected a standard scanning protocol without these additional technologies. Keystrokes were significantly reduced with the advanced protocol as compared to the typical protocol (230.9 ± 24.2 vs. 502.8 ± 56.2; difference 271.9 ± 61.3, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a reduction in scan time with protocol A compared to protocol B the standard TTE protocol (13.4 ± 2.3 min vs. 18.0 ± 2.6 min; difference 4.6 ± 2.9 min, p < 0.001) as well as a decrease of approximately 27% in the time the sonographers were required to reach beyond a neutral position on the ultrasound console.
Conclusions: A TTE protocol that embraces modern technologies such as AI, automation, and multiplane imaging shows potential for a reduction in ultrasound keystrokes and scan time without a reduction in quality and interpretability. This may aid a reduction in ergonomic workload as compared to a standard TTE.
背景:近年来,经胸超声心动图(TTE)患者的数量有所增加,导致更多的心脏超声医师报告与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疼痛。我们试图确定用先进技术(如多平面成像、人工智能(AI)和自动化)取代传统工作流程的扫描协议是否可用于优化传统工作流程,并潜在地降低心脏超声医师的人体工程学风险。目的是评估与标准超声心动图相比,这种替代方案是否可以减少主动扫描时间以及与超声机器的相互作用,而不会降低图像质量和可解释性。方法和结果:招募志愿者参加一项研究,该研究由两个不同协议的TTE组成。两者都是临床完成的,但方案A结合了自动化、人工智能辅助采集和测量、同时和多平面成像,而方案B反映了标准的扫描方案,没有这些额外的技术。与典型协议相比,高级协议的击键次数显著减少(230.9±24.2 vs 502.8±56.2;结论:采用人工智能、自动化和多平面成像等现代技术的TTE协议显示出在不降低质量和可解释性的情况下减少超声按键和扫描时间的潜力。与标准TTE相比,这可能有助于减少人体工程学工作量。
期刊介绍:
Echo Research and Practice aims to be the premier international journal for physicians, sonographers, nurses and other allied health professionals practising echocardiography and other cardiac imaging modalities. This open-access journal publishes quality clinical and basic research, reviews, videos, education materials and selected high-interest case reports and videos across all echocardiography modalities and disciplines, including paediatrics, anaesthetics, general practice, acute medicine and intensive care. Multi-modality studies primarily featuring the use of cardiac ultrasound in clinical practice, in association with Cardiac Computed Tomography, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance or Nuclear Cardiology are of interest. Topics include, but are not limited to: 2D echocardiography 3D echocardiography Comparative imaging techniques – CCT, CMR and Nuclear Cardiology Congenital heart disease, including foetal echocardiography Contrast echocardiography Critical care echocardiography Deformation imaging Doppler echocardiography Interventional echocardiography Intracardiac echocardiography Intraoperative echocardiography Prosthetic valves Stress echocardiography Technical innovations Transoesophageal echocardiography Valve disease.