Hand Size Reduces the Reliability of K-Force® Grip Dynamometer.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Feray Karademir, Özgün Uysal, Şule Tüzen Tek, Esra Merve Çakıryılmaz, Tüzün Fırat
{"title":"Hand Size Reduces the Reliability of K-Force® Grip Dynamometer.","authors":"Feray Karademir, Özgün Uysal, Şule Tüzen Tek, Esra Merve Çakıryılmaz, Tüzün Fırat","doi":"10.1177/17589983251347238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective evaluation of grip strength is crucial for determining functional status of patients and demonstrating treatment effectiveness. A novel dynamometer, K-Force® Grip, has been developed that can work in conjunction with smart devices. However, the device has a smaller circumference compared to the Jamar®Plus+ and lacks an adjustable grip width, unlike the Jamar®Plus+. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the K-Force® Grip across different hand sizes in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 1 23 healthy subjects (n=246 hands) and categorized them based on hand length and span. Grip strength was measured using both the Jamar®Plus + hydraulic hand dynamometer and the K-Force® Grip dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-device consistency was excellent for the overall population (ICC=0.937) and for individuals with large hand spans and long hand lengths. It was good for other anthropometric groups. However, ICC estimates for absolute inter-device agreement indicated high variability and were unstable (as indicated by the confidence intervals including zero). BlandAltman plots suggest K-Force® values are systematically lower than those from the Jamar®Plus+.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The devices should not be used interchangeably in research settings. For clinical follow-up, the Jamar®Plus + dynamometer is recommended, especially in adolescent populations where hand growth continues over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"17589983251347238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983251347238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Objective evaluation of grip strength is crucial for determining functional status of patients and demonstrating treatment effectiveness. A novel dynamometer, K-Force® Grip, has been developed that can work in conjunction with smart devices. However, the device has a smaller circumference compared to the Jamar®Plus+ and lacks an adjustable grip width, unlike the Jamar®Plus+. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the K-Force® Grip across different hand sizes in healthy subjects.

Methods: We recruited 1 23 healthy subjects (n=246 hands) and categorized them based on hand length and span. Grip strength was measured using both the Jamar®Plus + hydraulic hand dynamometer and the K-Force® Grip dynamometer.

Results: Inter-device consistency was excellent for the overall population (ICC=0.937) and for individuals with large hand spans and long hand lengths. It was good for other anthropometric groups. However, ICC estimates for absolute inter-device agreement indicated high variability and were unstable (as indicated by the confidence intervals including zero). BlandAltman plots suggest K-Force® values are systematically lower than those from the Jamar®Plus+.

Conclusion: The devices should not be used interchangeably in research settings. For clinical follow-up, the Jamar®Plus + dynamometer is recommended, especially in adolescent populations where hand growth continues over time.

手的大小降低了K-Force®握力测功仪的可靠性。
背景:客观评估握力对确定患者的功能状态和证明治疗效果至关重要。一种新型的测力计,K-Force®Grip,已经开发出来,可以与智能设备一起工作。然而,与Jamar®Plus+相比,该设备的周长较小,并且缺乏可调节的握把宽度,这与Jamar®Plus+不同。本研究的目的是评估K-Force®握把在不同手型的健康受试者中的效度和可靠性。方法:招募健康受试者123人(246只手),根据手的长度和广度进行分类。握力测量使用Jamar®Plus +液压手测力仪和K-Force®握力测力仪。结果:器械间的一致性在总体人群(ICC=0.937)和手跨大、手长个体中都很好。这对其他人体测量组也有好处。然而,ICC对绝对设备间一致性的估计表明高度可变性并且不稳定(如包括零的置信区间所示)。BlandAltman图显示,K-Force®值系统地低于来自Jamar®Plus+的值。结论:在研究环境中不应互换使用这些装置。对于临床随访,推荐使用Jamar®Plus +测力仪,特别是在手部持续生长的青少年人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信