Medication error reporting system: barriers and challenging issues among HCPs in Saudi Arabia - a cross-sectional study.

Q2 Medicine
Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2025.2520745
Saja Mohammed A Alasmari, Maryam Alwan Mousa Ali, Jawharah Mubarak Alqhtani, Ma'an Jumah Al-Alwani, Waad Fahad Alotaibi, Noha Tashkandi, Asma Malawi Alshahrani
{"title":"Medication error reporting system: barriers and challenging issues among HCPs in Saudi Arabia - a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Saja Mohammed A Alasmari, Maryam Alwan Mousa Ali, Jawharah Mubarak Alqhtani, Ma'an Jumah Al-Alwani, Waad Fahad Alotaibi, Noha Tashkandi, Asma Malawi Alshahrani","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2025.2520745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication errors pose a significant threat to patient safety globally, including in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' (HCPs) understanding, attitudes, and challenges regarding medication error reporting in Saudi hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered online questionnaire among HCPs (physicians, pharmacists, and nurses) from various hospitals across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire explored their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences related to medication error reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 170 hCPs participated in the study, with the majority being under 35 years old (67.06%), female (70.59%), and Saudi nationals (74.71%). A majority of participants (87.06%) had heard of the medication error report form, and 73.53% reported medication errors before. Participants aged less than 35 years had significantly lower knowledge scores compared to those aged 35-45 years (<i>p</i> = 0.021), and male participants had significantly higher knowledge scores compared to female participants (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Pharmacists had the highest knowledge scores among all health professions (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and participants working in government hospitals had significantly higher knowledge scores compared to those working in private hospitals (<i>p</i> = 0.034). In terms of attitude scores, male participants had significantly higher attitude scores compared to female participants (<i>p</i> = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights progress in medication error reporting among HCPs in Saudi Arabia but identifies gaps in knowledge, reporting, and systemic barriers. Addressing these challenges through education, process optimization, and a non-punitive reporting culture is key to improving safety. Future research should expand beyond hospitals and assess policy and training impacts over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":" ","pages":"2520745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2025.2520745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medication errors pose a significant threat to patient safety globally, including in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' (HCPs) understanding, attitudes, and challenges regarding medication error reporting in Saudi hospitals.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered online questionnaire among HCPs (physicians, pharmacists, and nurses) from various hospitals across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire explored their knowledge, attitudes, and experiences related to medication error reporting.

Results: A total of 170 hCPs participated in the study, with the majority being under 35 years old (67.06%), female (70.59%), and Saudi nationals (74.71%). A majority of participants (87.06%) had heard of the medication error report form, and 73.53% reported medication errors before. Participants aged less than 35 years had significantly lower knowledge scores compared to those aged 35-45 years (p = 0.021), and male participants had significantly higher knowledge scores compared to female participants (p = 0.005). Pharmacists had the highest knowledge scores among all health professions (p < 0.001), and participants working in government hospitals had significantly higher knowledge scores compared to those working in private hospitals (p = 0.034). In terms of attitude scores, male participants had significantly higher attitude scores compared to female participants (p = 0.046).

Conclusions: This study highlights progress in medication error reporting among HCPs in Saudi Arabia but identifies gaps in knowledge, reporting, and systemic barriers. Addressing these challenges through education, process optimization, and a non-punitive reporting culture is key to improving safety. Future research should expand beyond hospitals and assess policy and training impacts over time.

药物错误报告系统:障碍和具有挑战性的问题在沙特阿拉伯的HCPs -一项横断面研究。
目的:药物错误对全球患者安全构成重大威胁,包括在沙特阿拉伯。本研究旨在评估医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的理解,态度和挑战,关于沙特医院的用药错误报告。方法:在沙特阿拉伯各医院的hcp(医生、药剂师和护士)中进行了一项横断面研究,使用自我管理的在线问卷。问卷调查了他们对药物差错报告的知识、态度和经历。结果:共有170名HCPs参与研究,其中以35岁以下(67.06%)、女性(70.59%)和沙特国民(74.71%)居多。绝大多数(87.06%)受访者听说过用药错误报告表,其中73.53%的受访者曾报告过用药错误。35岁以下被试的知识得分显著低于35-45岁被试(p = 0.021),男性被试的知识得分显著高于女性(p = 0.005)。药师的知识得分最高(p p = 0.034)。在态度得分方面,男性参与者的态度得分显著高于女性参与者(p = 0.046)。结论:本研究强调了沙特阿拉伯HCPs在药物错误报告方面的进展,但也指出了知识、报告和系统性障碍方面的差距。通过教育、流程优化和非惩罚性报告文化来解决这些挑战是提高安全性的关键。未来的研究应扩展到医院之外,并评估政策和培训的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信