Economic analysis of triclosan-coated versus uncoated sutures at preventing surgical site infection in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2025-000383
Mwayi Kachapila, Dmitri Nepogodiev, Bryar Kadir, Maria Picciochi, Sivesh K Kamarajah, Aneel Bhangu, Raymond Oppong
{"title":"Economic analysis of triclosan-coated versus uncoated sutures at preventing surgical site infection in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.","authors":"Mwayi Kachapila, Dmitri Nepogodiev, Bryar Kadir, Maria Picciochi, Sivesh K Kamarajah, Aneel Bhangu, Raymond Oppong","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2025-000383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized trials casts doubt on the effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures in reducing surgical site infection (SSI). This economic analysis is aimed at assessing whether triclosan-coated sutures, compared with uncoated sutures, can reduce costs from a healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a model-based economic analysis mainly informed by baseline SSI rates, effect size CIs from a recent meta-analysis of high-quality trials (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09, p=0.29), and country-specific cost data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This was a worldwide analysis that estimated average cost savings aggregated for high, middle, and low Human Development Index (HDI) countries and country-specific cost savings for the 193 countries on the HDI list.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The analysis was informed by baseline SSI rates from an international cohort study (12 539 patients).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Results are reported in 2022 US dollars as average cost differences associated with SSI between coated and uncoated sutures. Deterministic sensitivity analyses examined variations in suture cost, hospital stay costs, and effect size, with best and worst-case scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SSI-related cost differences per patient ranged from -$466 to $171 in high-HDI, -$23 to $18 in middle-HDI, and -$34 to $22 in low-HDI countries when triclosan-coated sutures were used. The largest potential savings and expenditure occurred in contaminated-dirty wounds. Similar results were observed at the national level in 184 of 193 countries. Best-case to worst-case analyses showed a range of -$533 to $192 in high-HDI, -$57 to $49 in middle-HDI and -$69 to $52 in low-HDI countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis highlights significant uncertainty regarding cost savings with routine use of triclosan-coated sutures, emphasizing the need for high-quality data and CI-based economic analysis in policy making.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2025-000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A recent meta-analysis of high-quality randomized trials casts doubt on the effectiveness of triclosan-coated sutures in reducing surgical site infection (SSI). This economic analysis is aimed at assessing whether triclosan-coated sutures, compared with uncoated sutures, can reduce costs from a healthcare perspective.

Design: This was a model-based economic analysis mainly informed by baseline SSI rates, effect size CIs from a recent meta-analysis of high-quality trials (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09, p=0.29), and country-specific cost data.

Setting: This was a worldwide analysis that estimated average cost savings aggregated for high, middle, and low Human Development Index (HDI) countries and country-specific cost savings for the 193 countries on the HDI list.

Participants: Participants were patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The analysis was informed by baseline SSI rates from an international cohort study (12 539 patients).

Main outcome measures: Results are reported in 2022 US dollars as average cost differences associated with SSI between coated and uncoated sutures. Deterministic sensitivity analyses examined variations in suture cost, hospital stay costs, and effect size, with best and worst-case scenario analyses.

Results: SSI-related cost differences per patient ranged from -$466 to $171 in high-HDI, -$23 to $18 in middle-HDI, and -$34 to $22 in low-HDI countries when triclosan-coated sutures were used. The largest potential savings and expenditure occurred in contaminated-dirty wounds. Similar results were observed at the national level in 184 of 193 countries. Best-case to worst-case analyses showed a range of -$533 to $192 in high-HDI, -$57 to $49 in middle-HDI and -$69 to $52 in low-HDI countries.

Conclusions: This analysis highlights significant uncertainty regarding cost savings with routine use of triclosan-coated sutures, emphasizing the need for high-quality data and CI-based economic analysis in policy making.

三氯生包被缝合线与未包被缝合线预防腹部手术患者手术部位感染的经济分析。
目的:最近一项高质量随机试验的荟萃分析对三氯生涂层缝合线减少手术部位感染(SSI)的有效性提出了质疑。本经济分析旨在评估三氯生涂层缝合线与未涂层缝合线相比,是否可以从医疗保健的角度降低成本。设计:这是一项基于模型的经济分析,主要依据基线SSI率、近期高质量试验荟萃分析的效应大小CI (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74至1.09,p=0.29)和国家特定成本数据。背景:这是一项全球范围的分析,估计了人类发展指数(HDI)高、中、低国家的平均成本节约总和,以及HDI名单上193个国家的具体国家成本节约。参与者:接受腹部手术的患者。该分析基于一项国际队列研究(12539例患者)的基线SSI率。主要结局指标:结果以2022美元报告,即涂层和未涂层缝合线与SSI相关的平均成本差异。确定性敏感性分析检查了缝合成本、住院成本和效应大小的变化,并进行了最佳和最坏情况分析。结果:当使用三氯生包覆缝线时,高hdi国家患者的ssi相关成本差异为- 466美元至171美元,中等hdi国家为- 23美元至18美元,低hdi国家为- 34美元至22美元。最大的潜在节省和支出发生在污染-肮脏伤口。在193个国家中,有184个国家也观察到了类似的结果。从最佳情况到最坏情况的分析显示,高hdi国家的消费范围为- 533美元至192美元,中等hdi国家为- 57美元至49美元,低hdi国家为- 69美元至52美元。结论:该分析强调了常规使用三氯生包覆缝线是否能节省成本的重大不确定性,强调了在制定政策时需要高质量的数据和基于ci的经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信