{"title":"Systematic review: the use of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.","authors":"Vinay Jangra, Dilsan Yilmaz, Delvene Soares, Fiona Taylor, Stefano Andreani, Alexander Hotouras","doi":"10.1177/20406223251333570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SR-UC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis (UC) that persists despite high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Management is challenging and often requires biologics, immunosuppressants or colectomy. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects, has emerged as a potential alternative, though its efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in SR-UC, compares it with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, and examines its role in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative proctitis (SR-UP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed and Medline (1998-2025) identified studies reporting clinical remission, response rates, adverse effects and colectomy rates. Subgroup analyses compared oral tacrolimus with anti-TNF therapy and evaluated topical tacrolimus in SR-UP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (658 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus demonstrated variable efficacy, with clinical remission rates of 9.4%-75.6% and response rates of 28.6%-89.6%. Adverse events, mainly neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, occurred in 16.7%-53.0% of cases, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation. Colectomy rates ranged from 6.1% to 62%. No significant difference was observed between tacrolimus and anti-TNF agents in remission induction, though anti-TNFs had superior long-term outcomes. Topical tacrolimus showed promising efficacy in SR-UP (73.0%-75.0% remission) but was associated with high adverse event rates (45.0%-67.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tacrolimus is a viable option for SR-UC, particularly in combination therapy, but its long-term efficacy remains uncertain. While it is comparable to anti-TNFs for short-term remission, high colectomy rates and adverse effects require careful monitoring. Topical tacrolimus shows promise for SR-UP but requires standardised dosing. Further large-scale trials are needed to optimise treatment strategies and evaluate long-term safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023432827), the international prospective register of systematic reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"20406223251333570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223251333570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SR-UC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis (UC) that persists despite high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Management is challenging and often requires biologics, immunosuppressants or colectomy. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with immunomodulatory effects, has emerged as a potential alternative, though its efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes remain uncertain.
Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in SR-UC, compares it with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, and examines its role in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative proctitis (SR-UP).
Design: A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework.
Data sources and methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Medline (1998-2025) identified studies reporting clinical remission, response rates, adverse effects and colectomy rates. Subgroup analyses compared oral tacrolimus with anti-TNF therapy and evaluated topical tacrolimus in SR-UP.
Results: Seventeen studies (658 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus demonstrated variable efficacy, with clinical remission rates of 9.4%-75.6% and response rates of 28.6%-89.6%. Adverse events, mainly neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, occurred in 16.7%-53.0% of cases, sometimes leading to treatment discontinuation. Colectomy rates ranged from 6.1% to 62%. No significant difference was observed between tacrolimus and anti-TNF agents in remission induction, though anti-TNFs had superior long-term outcomes. Topical tacrolimus showed promising efficacy in SR-UP (73.0%-75.0% remission) but was associated with high adverse event rates (45.0%-67.0%).
Conclusion: Tacrolimus is a viable option for SR-UC, particularly in combination therapy, but its long-term efficacy remains uncertain. While it is comparable to anti-TNFs for short-term remission, high colectomy rates and adverse effects require careful monitoring. Topical tacrolimus shows promise for SR-UP but requires standardised dosing. Further large-scale trials are needed to optimise treatment strategies and evaluate long-term safety.
Trial registration: The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023432827), the international prospective register of systematic reviews.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.