Per D Trobisch, Hong Jin Kim, Jil Frank, Pierre Noelen, Dong-Gune Chang
{"title":"Outcomes after vertebral body tethering for Lenke type 5 scoliosis continue to improve: analysis of different surgical techniques.","authors":"Per D Trobisch, Hong Jin Kim, Jil Frank, Pierre Noelen, Dong-Gune Chang","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01130-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a motion-preserving surgical technique for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly for thoracolumbar (TL) curves. While the technique has demonstrated potential benefits, its outcomes remain less predictable compared to posterior spinal fusion (PSF), with complications, such as tether breakages and revision surgeries. This study evaluates the impact of surgical experience and implant modifications on the outcomes of TL VBT for Lenke type 5 curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive AIS patients who underwent TL VBT from 2017 to 2022. The cohort was divided into three groups based on surgical technique and implant evolution: Group 1 (single-tether), Group 2 (double-tether), and Group 3 (advanced experience with 2nd generation implants). Radiographic outcomes, success rates (defined as a postoperative Cobb angle ≤ 30°), and complications were analysed at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 patients were included. Average correction rates were 53.7%, 62.6%, 71.2% for groups 1, 2, and 3. Group 3 had a 100% success rate at 2 years, compared to 42.9% in Group 1 and 40% in Group 2 (P = 0.010). Early tether breakage rate (at 1 year) significantly correlated with experience (85.7% vs. 40% vs. 12.5%). Revision rate was 28.6% for Group 1 and 0 for groups 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that advanced surgical techniques and improved implants are key to achieving superior radiological outcomes and reducing revision rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01130-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a motion-preserving surgical technique for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly for thoracolumbar (TL) curves. While the technique has demonstrated potential benefits, its outcomes remain less predictable compared to posterior spinal fusion (PSF), with complications, such as tether breakages and revision surgeries. This study evaluates the impact of surgical experience and implant modifications on the outcomes of TL VBT for Lenke type 5 curves.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive AIS patients who underwent TL VBT from 2017 to 2022. The cohort was divided into three groups based on surgical technique and implant evolution: Group 1 (single-tether), Group 2 (double-tether), and Group 3 (advanced experience with 2nd generation implants). Radiographic outcomes, success rates (defined as a postoperative Cobb angle ≤ 30°), and complications were analysed at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.
Results: 30 patients were included. Average correction rates were 53.7%, 62.6%, 71.2% for groups 1, 2, and 3. Group 3 had a 100% success rate at 2 years, compared to 42.9% in Group 1 and 40% in Group 2 (P = 0.010). Early tether breakage rate (at 1 year) significantly correlated with experience (85.7% vs. 40% vs. 12.5%). Revision rate was 28.6% for Group 1 and 0 for groups 2 and 3.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that advanced surgical techniques and improved implants are key to achieving superior radiological outcomes and reducing revision rates.
期刊介绍:
Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.