Outcomes after vertebral body tethering for Lenke type 5 scoliosis continue to improve: analysis of different surgical techniques.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Per D Trobisch, Hong Jin Kim, Jil Frank, Pierre Noelen, Dong-Gune Chang
{"title":"Outcomes after vertebral body tethering for Lenke type 5 scoliosis continue to improve: analysis of different surgical techniques.","authors":"Per D Trobisch, Hong Jin Kim, Jil Frank, Pierre Noelen, Dong-Gune Chang","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01130-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a motion-preserving surgical technique for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly for thoracolumbar (TL) curves. While the technique has demonstrated potential benefits, its outcomes remain less predictable compared to posterior spinal fusion (PSF), with complications, such as tether breakages and revision surgeries. This study evaluates the impact of surgical experience and implant modifications on the outcomes of TL VBT for Lenke type 5 curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive AIS patients who underwent TL VBT from 2017 to 2022. The cohort was divided into three groups based on surgical technique and implant evolution: Group 1 (single-tether), Group 2 (double-tether), and Group 3 (advanced experience with 2nd generation implants). Radiographic outcomes, success rates (defined as a postoperative Cobb angle ≤ 30°), and complications were analysed at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 patients were included. Average correction rates were 53.7%, 62.6%, 71.2% for groups 1, 2, and 3. Group 3 had a 100% success rate at 2 years, compared to 42.9% in Group 1 and 40% in Group 2 (P = 0.010). Early tether breakage rate (at 1 year) significantly correlated with experience (85.7% vs. 40% vs. 12.5%). Revision rate was 28.6% for Group 1 and 0 for groups 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that advanced surgical techniques and improved implants are key to achieving superior radiological outcomes and reducing revision rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01130-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a motion-preserving surgical technique for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), particularly for thoracolumbar (TL) curves. While the technique has demonstrated potential benefits, its outcomes remain less predictable compared to posterior spinal fusion (PSF), with complications, such as tether breakages and revision surgeries. This study evaluates the impact of surgical experience and implant modifications on the outcomes of TL VBT for Lenke type 5 curves.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive AIS patients who underwent TL VBT from 2017 to 2022. The cohort was divided into three groups based on surgical technique and implant evolution: Group 1 (single-tether), Group 2 (double-tether), and Group 3 (advanced experience with 2nd generation implants). Radiographic outcomes, success rates (defined as a postoperative Cobb angle ≤ 30°), and complications were analysed at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.

Results: 30 patients were included. Average correction rates were 53.7%, 62.6%, 71.2% for groups 1, 2, and 3. Group 3 had a 100% success rate at 2 years, compared to 42.9% in Group 1 and 40% in Group 2 (P = 0.010). Early tether breakage rate (at 1 year) significantly correlated with experience (85.7% vs. 40% vs. 12.5%). Revision rate was 28.6% for Group 1 and 0 for groups 2 and 3.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that advanced surgical techniques and improved implants are key to achieving superior radiological outcomes and reducing revision rates.

Lenke 5型脊柱侧凸椎体系扎术后疗效持续改善:不同手术技术分析
目的:椎体系扎术(VBT)是一种保持运动的手术技术,用于治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS),特别是胸腰椎(TL)弯曲。虽然该技术已经证明了潜在的好处,但与后路脊柱融合术(PSF)相比,其结果仍然难以预测,并伴有并发症,如系索断裂和翻修手术。本研究评估手术经验和种植体修改对Lenke 5型弯曲TL - VBT结果的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2022年所有连续接受TL - VBT的AIS患者。根据手术技术和种植体的发展将队列分为三组:1组(单系绳),2组(双系绳)和3组(第二代种植体的先进经验)。在1年和2年的随访中分析影像学结果、成功率(定义为术后Cobb角≤30°)和并发症。结果:共纳入30例患者。1、2、3组的平均纠正率分别为53.7%、62.6%、71.2%。第3组2年的成功率为100%,第1组为42.9%,第2组为40% (P = 0.010)。早期系绳断裂率(1年)与经验显著相关(85.7% vs. 40% vs. 12.5%)。第1组修正率为28.6%,第2、3组修正率为0。结论:这些研究结果表明,先进的手术技术和改良的种植体是获得良好放射预后和降低翻修率的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信