Changing practice patterns in axillary management for patients with node-positive breast cancer towards increased use of sentinel lymph node biopsy-alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a survey (MF17-01) among Turkish surgeons.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Damla Okan Ercan, İrem Karataş, Erhan Eröz, Safa Toprak, Selman Emiroğlu, Elnur Hüseynov, Enver Özkurt, Baran Mollavelioğlu, Mustafa Tükenmez, Mahmut Müslümanoğlu, Abdullah İğci, Vahit Özmen
{"title":"Changing practice patterns in axillary management for patients with node-positive breast cancer towards increased use of sentinel lymph node biopsy-alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a survey (MF17-01) among Turkish surgeons.","authors":"Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Damla Okan Ercan, İrem Karataş, Erhan Eröz, Safa Toprak, Selman Emiroğlu, Elnur Hüseynov, Enver Özkurt, Baran Mollavelioğlu, Mustafa Tükenmez, Mahmut Müslümanoğlu, Abdullah İğci, Vahit Özmen","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03767-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the knowledge of major benchmark trials among Turkish general surgeons to investigate if they have adopted the results in their practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 general surgeons from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Society (TFBDS) were asked to complete a survey that included 24 multiple-choice questions regarding the surgical practice in axillary surgery for early and locally advanced breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most surgeons were familiar with prospective axillary surgery studies including ACOSOG Z0011 (n = 77, 76.2%), AMAROS (n = 76, 75.2%), IBCSG 23 - 01 (n = 58, 57.4%), ACOSOG Z1071 (n = 63, 62.4%), and SENTINA (n = 67, 66.3%). Among the surgeons participating in the present survey, breast surgeons (38.6%) were less likely to perform axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early stage patients with a 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with micro- or macrometastases, as opposed to those who defined themselves as general surgeons (ALND; 36.8% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.015). Almost all surgeons suggested neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients presenting with T4 (94.8%) or N2-3 disease (92.0%), whereas almost half of the surgeons (40.5%) always proceeded with NAC in patients with clinically node-positive cN1 breast cancer. Overall, 86.1% of surgeons performed SLNB in patients whose axilla became clinically negative after NAC. More than half of the surgeons (55.2%) preferred blue dye as the SLNB technique and 37 (42.5%) used the combined method. Among 87 surgeons, 24.1% (n = 21) always, 39.1% (n = 34) sometimes, and 36.8% (n = 32) never preferred clip marking of axillary metastatic lymph nodes before NAC, whereas 56.4% performed targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after NAC. In cN+ patients before NAC, the majority of surgeons (74.3%) did not perform ALND in patients with at least three lymph nodes removed and SLNB negative. Of note, more than half of the surgeons (51.5%) did not perform ALND in the presence of isolated tumor cells or micrometastases among the three SLNs as long as regional nodal irradiation was received. However, 54.5% of the patients routinely underwent ALND in the presence of macrometastatic residual nodal disease after NAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deescalating strategies in axillary surgery have been increasing in both initially clinically node-negative and-positive breast cancers as long as nodal radiation is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03767-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the knowledge of major benchmark trials among Turkish general surgeons to investigate if they have adopted the results in their practice.

Methods: A total of 101 general surgeons from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Society (TFBDS) were asked to complete a survey that included 24 multiple-choice questions regarding the surgical practice in axillary surgery for early and locally advanced breast cancer.

Results: Most surgeons were familiar with prospective axillary surgery studies including ACOSOG Z0011 (n = 77, 76.2%), AMAROS (n = 76, 75.2%), IBCSG 23 - 01 (n = 58, 57.4%), ACOSOG Z1071 (n = 63, 62.4%), and SENTINA (n = 67, 66.3%). Among the surgeons participating in the present survey, breast surgeons (38.6%) were less likely to perform axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early stage patients with a 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with micro- or macrometastases, as opposed to those who defined themselves as general surgeons (ALND; 36.8% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.015). Almost all surgeons suggested neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients presenting with T4 (94.8%) or N2-3 disease (92.0%), whereas almost half of the surgeons (40.5%) always proceeded with NAC in patients with clinically node-positive cN1 breast cancer. Overall, 86.1% of surgeons performed SLNB in patients whose axilla became clinically negative after NAC. More than half of the surgeons (55.2%) preferred blue dye as the SLNB technique and 37 (42.5%) used the combined method. Among 87 surgeons, 24.1% (n = 21) always, 39.1% (n = 34) sometimes, and 36.8% (n = 32) never preferred clip marking of axillary metastatic lymph nodes before NAC, whereas 56.4% performed targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after NAC. In cN+ patients before NAC, the majority of surgeons (74.3%) did not perform ALND in patients with at least three lymph nodes removed and SLNB negative. Of note, more than half of the surgeons (51.5%) did not perform ALND in the presence of isolated tumor cells or micrometastases among the three SLNs as long as regional nodal irradiation was received. However, 54.5% of the patients routinely underwent ALND in the presence of macrometastatic residual nodal disease after NAC.

Conclusion: Deescalating strategies in axillary surgery have been increasing in both initially clinically node-negative and-positive breast cancers as long as nodal radiation is provided.

一项针对土耳其外科医生的调查结果(MF17-01)显示,淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝管理的实践模式发生了变化,新辅助化疗后增加了单独前哨淋巴结活检的使用。
背景:本研究旨在确定土耳其普通外科医生的主要基准试验的知识,以调查他们是否在实践中采用了结果。方法:对来自土耳其乳腺疾病协会联合会(TFBDS)的101名普通外科医生进行问卷调查,问卷内容包括24道选择题,内容涉及早期和局部晚期乳腺癌腋窝手术的手术实践。结果:大多数外科医生熟悉前瞻性腋窝手术研究,包括ACOSOG Z0011 (n = 77, 76.2%)、AMAROS (n = 76, 75.2%)、IBCSG 23 - 01 (n = 58, 57.4%)、ACOSOG Z1071 (n = 63, 62.4%)和SENTINA (n = 67, 66.3%)。在参与本次调查的外科医生中,乳房外科医生(38.6%)不太可能对1-2个前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)阳性的早期患者进行腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND),并伴有微转移或大转移,而那些将自己定义为普通外科医生(ALND;36.8% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.015)。几乎所有的外科医生都建议对T4(94.8%)或N2-3(92.0%)的患者进行新辅助化疗(NAC),而几乎一半的外科医生(40.5%)总是对临床淋巴结阳性的cN1乳腺癌患者进行NAC。总体而言,86.1%的外科医生对NAC后腋窝临床阴性的患者进行了SLNB手术。超过一半的外科医生(55.2%)选择蓝色染料作为SLNB技术,37名外科医生(42.5%)选择联合方法。87位外科医生中,有24.1% (n = 21)总是,39.1% (n = 34)有时,36.8% (n = 32)不喜欢在NAC前对腋窝转移淋巴结进行夹子标记,而在NAC后进行靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)的外科医生占56.4%。在NAC前的cN+患者中,大多数(74.3%)的外科医生没有对至少三个淋巴结切除且SLNB阴性的患者进行ALND。值得注意的是,超过一半(51.5%)的外科医生在三个sln之间存在孤立肿瘤细胞或微转移的情况下,只要接受了局部淋巴结照射,就不进行ALND。然而,54.5%的患者在NAC后存在大转移性残留淋巴结疾病时常规行ALND。结论:只要提供淋巴结放射治疗,在最初临床淋巴结阴性和阳性的乳腺癌中,腋窝手术的降压策略都有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信