Results from the Italian Nexus aRCH Endovascular repair Registry for endovascular aortic arch repair.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Michele Antonello, Andrea Spertino, Emanuele Gatta, Gabriele Piffaretti, Giacomo Isernia, Wassim Mansour, Luca Bertoglio, Eugenio Martelli, Gian Franco Veraldi, Roberto Silingardi, Fabrizio Farneti, Riccardo Corbetta, Augusto D'onofrio, Alessandra Rinaldi Garofalo, Francesco Squizzato, Michele Piazza
{"title":"Results from the Italian Nexus aRCH Endovascular repair Registry for endovascular aortic arch repair.","authors":"Michele Antonello, Andrea Spertino, Emanuele Gatta, Gabriele Piffaretti, Giacomo Isernia, Wassim Mansour, Luca Bertoglio, Eugenio Martelli, Gian Franco Veraldi, Roberto Silingardi, Fabrizio Farneti, Riccardo Corbetta, Augusto D'onofrio, Alessandra Rinaldi Garofalo, Francesco Squizzato, Michele Piazza","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective study with prospectively collected data was conducted as part of the Italian Nexus Aortic aRCH Endovascular Repair Registry (INARCHER) between 2019 and 2024. Nexus platforms include an off the shelf bimodular single branch endograft and a custom-made double branch custom made device. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic arch repair with the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems at participating centers were included. The study addressed both aortic arch aneurysm and dissection. Data collection included baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up results. The primary endpoints were early (30 days) major adverse events (MAEs), major stroke and mortality. Secondary endpoints included the need for device related reintervention and the device-related endoleak.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 31 cases from 11 centers. Mean age was 73.4 ± 7.32 and 77.4% were male. Thirteen patients had a degenerative aneurysm, 3 a pseudoaneurysm after prior surgical repair, 2 penetrating aortic ulcers and 13 cases an aortic dissection (subacute, n=1; chronic, n=12). Prior ascending aorta replacement was present in 15 cases (48.4%). Seven (22.6%) patients received an urgent treatment. Twenty-five cases were treated with complete supra-aortic-trunks debranching and Nexus, six cases with LSA- LCA debranching and Nexus Duo. The mean operative time was 230 ± 73 minutes. Technical success was achieved in 97% of procedures owing to one case of type IA endoleak. Perioperative mortality was 6.5%, related to a massive pulmonary embolism and a cardiac arrest. Major strokes occurred in 6.5%. MAEs rate was 22.6%. The mean follow-up period was 29.7 ± 24.9 months. Beyond 30 days there were no aortic related mortality and freedom from related reintervention was 97% (95%CI 91-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems appears to be a safe option for the treatment of aortic arch dissection and aneurysm, with complication rates consistent with existing literature for such high-complexity cases. Endovascular aortic arch repair remains a challenging procedure with non-negligible neurological complication, requiring ongoing improvements to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems.

Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study with prospectively collected data was conducted as part of the Italian Nexus Aortic aRCH Endovascular Repair Registry (INARCHER) between 2019 and 2024. Nexus platforms include an off the shelf bimodular single branch endograft and a custom-made double branch custom made device. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic arch repair with the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems at participating centers were included. The study addressed both aortic arch aneurysm and dissection. Data collection included baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up results. The primary endpoints were early (30 days) major adverse events (MAEs), major stroke and mortality. Secondary endpoints included the need for device related reintervention and the device-related endoleak.

Results: We collected 31 cases from 11 centers. Mean age was 73.4 ± 7.32 and 77.4% were male. Thirteen patients had a degenerative aneurysm, 3 a pseudoaneurysm after prior surgical repair, 2 penetrating aortic ulcers and 13 cases an aortic dissection (subacute, n=1; chronic, n=12). Prior ascending aorta replacement was present in 15 cases (48.4%). Seven (22.6%) patients received an urgent treatment. Twenty-five cases were treated with complete supra-aortic-trunks debranching and Nexus, six cases with LSA- LCA debranching and Nexus Duo. The mean operative time was 230 ± 73 minutes. Technical success was achieved in 97% of procedures owing to one case of type IA endoleak. Perioperative mortality was 6.5%, related to a massive pulmonary embolism and a cardiac arrest. Major strokes occurred in 6.5%. MAEs rate was 22.6%. The mean follow-up period was 29.7 ± 24.9 months. Beyond 30 days there were no aortic related mortality and freedom from related reintervention was 97% (95%CI 91-100).

Conclusions: The use of the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems appears to be a safe option for the treatment of aortic arch dissection and aneurysm, with complication rates consistent with existing literature for such high-complexity cases. Endovascular aortic arch repair remains a challenging procedure with non-negligible neurological complication, requiring ongoing improvements to enhance patient outcomes.

来自意大利Nexus aRCH血管内修复注册中心的血管内主动脉弓修复结果。
目的:本研究的目的是评估使用Nexus和Nexus Duo血管内移植系统修复主动脉弓的安全性、有效性和临床结果。方法:一项多中心回顾性研究,前瞻性收集数据,作为2019年至2024年意大利Nexus主动脉弓血管内修复登记(INARCHER)的一部分。Nexus平台包括现成的双模块单分支内移植物和定制的双分支定制设备。在参与中心使用Nexus和Nexus Duo血管内移植系统进行血管内主动脉弓修复的患者被纳入研究。该研究涉及主动脉弓动脉瘤和夹层。数据收集包括基线患者特征、手术细节和随访结果。主要终点为早期(30天)主要不良事件(MAEs)、主要卒中和死亡率。次要终点包括与设备相关的再干预需求和与设备相关的内部泄漏。结果:从11个中心收集31例病例。平均年龄73.4±7.32岁,男性占77.4%。13例患者发生退行性动脉瘤,3例手术修复后出现假性动脉瘤,2例穿透性主动脉溃疡,13例发生主动脉夹层(亚急性,n=1;慢性,n = 12)。15例(48.4%)有升主动脉置换术。7例(22.6%)患者接受紧急治疗。主动脉上干完全脱支合并Nexus 25例,LSA- LCA脱支合并Nexus Duo 6例。平均手术时间230±73分钟。由于一例IA型内漏,97%的手术获得了技术上的成功。围手术期死亡率为6.5%,与大面积肺栓塞和心脏骤停有关。6.5%发生了严重中风。MAEs率为22.6%。平均随访29.7±24.9个月。超过30天,无主动脉相关死亡率,相关再干预率为97% (95%CI 91-100)。结论:使用Nexus和Nexus Duo内移植物系统似乎是治疗主动脉弓夹层和动脉瘤的安全选择,其并发症发生率与现有文献中这类高复杂性病例的发生率一致。血管内主动脉弓修复仍然是一项具有挑战性的手术,具有不可忽视的神经系统并发症,需要不断改进以提高患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信