Michele Antonello, Andrea Spertino, Emanuele Gatta, Gabriele Piffaretti, Giacomo Isernia, Wassim Mansour, Luca Bertoglio, Eugenio Martelli, Gian Franco Veraldi, Roberto Silingardi, Fabrizio Farneti, Riccardo Corbetta, Augusto D'onofrio, Alessandra Rinaldi Garofalo, Francesco Squizzato, Michele Piazza
{"title":"Results from the Italian Nexus aRCH Endovascular repair Registry for endovascular aortic arch repair.","authors":"Michele Antonello, Andrea Spertino, Emanuele Gatta, Gabriele Piffaretti, Giacomo Isernia, Wassim Mansour, Luca Bertoglio, Eugenio Martelli, Gian Franco Veraldi, Roberto Silingardi, Fabrizio Farneti, Riccardo Corbetta, Augusto D'onofrio, Alessandra Rinaldi Garofalo, Francesco Squizzato, Michele Piazza","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective study with prospectively collected data was conducted as part of the Italian Nexus Aortic aRCH Endovascular Repair Registry (INARCHER) between 2019 and 2024. Nexus platforms include an off the shelf bimodular single branch endograft and a custom-made double branch custom made device. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic arch repair with the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems at participating centers were included. The study addressed both aortic arch aneurysm and dissection. Data collection included baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up results. The primary endpoints were early (30 days) major adverse events (MAEs), major stroke and mortality. Secondary endpoints included the need for device related reintervention and the device-related endoleak.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 31 cases from 11 centers. Mean age was 73.4 ± 7.32 and 77.4% were male. Thirteen patients had a degenerative aneurysm, 3 a pseudoaneurysm after prior surgical repair, 2 penetrating aortic ulcers and 13 cases an aortic dissection (subacute, n=1; chronic, n=12). Prior ascending aorta replacement was present in 15 cases (48.4%). Seven (22.6%) patients received an urgent treatment. Twenty-five cases were treated with complete supra-aortic-trunks debranching and Nexus, six cases with LSA- LCA debranching and Nexus Duo. The mean operative time was 230 ± 73 minutes. Technical success was achieved in 97% of procedures owing to one case of type IA endoleak. Perioperative mortality was 6.5%, related to a massive pulmonary embolism and a cardiac arrest. Major strokes occurred in 6.5%. MAEs rate was 22.6%. The mean follow-up period was 29.7 ± 24.9 months. Beyond 30 days there were no aortic related mortality and freedom from related reintervention was 97% (95%CI 91-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems appears to be a safe option for the treatment of aortic arch dissection and aneurysm, with complication rates consistent with existing literature for such high-complexity cases. Endovascular aortic arch repair remains a challenging procedure with non-negligible neurological complication, requiring ongoing improvements to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems.
Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study with prospectively collected data was conducted as part of the Italian Nexus Aortic aRCH Endovascular Repair Registry (INARCHER) between 2019 and 2024. Nexus platforms include an off the shelf bimodular single branch endograft and a custom-made double branch custom made device. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic arch repair with the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems at participating centers were included. The study addressed both aortic arch aneurysm and dissection. Data collection included baseline patient characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up results. The primary endpoints were early (30 days) major adverse events (MAEs), major stroke and mortality. Secondary endpoints included the need for device related reintervention and the device-related endoleak.
Results: We collected 31 cases from 11 centers. Mean age was 73.4 ± 7.32 and 77.4% were male. Thirteen patients had a degenerative aneurysm, 3 a pseudoaneurysm after prior surgical repair, 2 penetrating aortic ulcers and 13 cases an aortic dissection (subacute, n=1; chronic, n=12). Prior ascending aorta replacement was present in 15 cases (48.4%). Seven (22.6%) patients received an urgent treatment. Twenty-five cases were treated with complete supra-aortic-trunks debranching and Nexus, six cases with LSA- LCA debranching and Nexus Duo. The mean operative time was 230 ± 73 minutes. Technical success was achieved in 97% of procedures owing to one case of type IA endoleak. Perioperative mortality was 6.5%, related to a massive pulmonary embolism and a cardiac arrest. Major strokes occurred in 6.5%. MAEs rate was 22.6%. The mean follow-up period was 29.7 ± 24.9 months. Beyond 30 days there were no aortic related mortality and freedom from related reintervention was 97% (95%CI 91-100).
Conclusions: The use of the Nexus and Nexus Duo endograft systems appears to be a safe option for the treatment of aortic arch dissection and aneurysm, with complication rates consistent with existing literature for such high-complexity cases. Endovascular aortic arch repair remains a challenging procedure with non-negligible neurological complication, requiring ongoing improvements to enhance patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.