Post-Operative Outcomes of General versus Regional Anesthesia for Lower Extremity Amputation.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Shannon McDonnell, Rylie O'Meara, Irena Helenowski, Pegge Halandras
{"title":"Post-Operative Outcomes of General versus Regional Anesthesia for Lower Extremity Amputation.","authors":"Shannon McDonnell, Rylie O'Meara, Irena Helenowski, Pegge Halandras","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Despite advances to open and endovascular surgery, lower extremity amputation remains an essential component of vascular surgery. Regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks can help avoid the postoperative morbidity associated with general anesthesia. Despite regional anesthesia as an option for patients, a recent large database study found that up to 90% of cases were still performed under general anesthesia. The aim of our study was to further evaluate if there is a significant difference in surgical outcomes that supports the use of regional over general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single institution retrospective cohort study of patients who received lower extremity amputations from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2023. Above- and below-knee amputations were included, and all amputations were performed by vascular surgeons. Patients were divided into three groups based on the anesthesia type they received during the case: general anesthesia, general and regional block, and regional block only. Patient characteristics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were then studied for each group. Continuous variables were summarized by medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), while categorical variables were summarized by frequencies and percentages. As there were repeated measures for several patients, GEE (generalized estimating equations) models with anesthesia group as the response were fit to assess differences between anesthesia groups. Multivariable models were fit assuming a binomial distribution, Poisson distribution, or multinomial distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 176 amputations were included in this study of whom 55 (35%) received regional block only, 94 (60%) received general anesthesia and block, and 27 (15%) received only general anesthesia. Above knee amputations were performed in 74 (42%) and below knee amputations were performed in 102 (58%) of patients in the study. The block only group was significantly associated with an older population (p = 0.006) and significantly associated with higher percentages of CHF (p = 0.001), CKD (p = 0.006), and diabetes (p = 0.002). The general only group had higher postoperative morbidity, with significantly higher percentages of PE (p < 0.001), DVT (p < 0.001), pneumonia (p = 0.032), and post-op ventilator use (p < 0.001). The general only group had significantly longer hospital length of stay (p = 0.03) and higher rates of expiration (p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, receiving general anesthesia only was significantly associated with a 30-day (p=0.009), 60-day (p=0.009), and 1 year mortality (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that the use of general anesthesia for lower extremity amputation has a significant and independent correlation with higher 30-day, 60-day, and 1-year mortality rates. Thus, a continued shift toward regional blocks in patients facing lower extremity amputation is indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives: Despite advances to open and endovascular surgery, lower extremity amputation remains an essential component of vascular surgery. Regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks can help avoid the postoperative morbidity associated with general anesthesia. Despite regional anesthesia as an option for patients, a recent large database study found that up to 90% of cases were still performed under general anesthesia. The aim of our study was to further evaluate if there is a significant difference in surgical outcomes that supports the use of regional over general anesthesia.

Methods: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study of patients who received lower extremity amputations from January 1, 2019 until December 31, 2023. Above- and below-knee amputations were included, and all amputations were performed by vascular surgeons. Patients were divided into three groups based on the anesthesia type they received during the case: general anesthesia, general and regional block, and regional block only. Patient characteristics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were then studied for each group. Continuous variables were summarized by medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), while categorical variables were summarized by frequencies and percentages. As there were repeated measures for several patients, GEE (generalized estimating equations) models with anesthesia group as the response were fit to assess differences between anesthesia groups. Multivariable models were fit assuming a binomial distribution, Poisson distribution, or multinomial distribution.

Results: A total of 176 amputations were included in this study of whom 55 (35%) received regional block only, 94 (60%) received general anesthesia and block, and 27 (15%) received only general anesthesia. Above knee amputations were performed in 74 (42%) and below knee amputations were performed in 102 (58%) of patients in the study. The block only group was significantly associated with an older population (p = 0.006) and significantly associated with higher percentages of CHF (p = 0.001), CKD (p = 0.006), and diabetes (p = 0.002). The general only group had higher postoperative morbidity, with significantly higher percentages of PE (p < 0.001), DVT (p < 0.001), pneumonia (p = 0.032), and post-op ventilator use (p < 0.001). The general only group had significantly longer hospital length of stay (p = 0.03) and higher rates of expiration (p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, receiving general anesthesia only was significantly associated with a 30-day (p=0.009), 60-day (p=0.009), and 1 year mortality (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the use of general anesthesia for lower extremity amputation has a significant and independent correlation with higher 30-day, 60-day, and 1-year mortality rates. Thus, a continued shift toward regional blocks in patients facing lower extremity amputation is indicated.

下肢截肢术后全身麻醉与区域麻醉的比较。
前言/目的:尽管开放和血管内手术取得了进展,下肢截肢仍然是血管手术的重要组成部分。周围神经阻滞的区域麻醉有助于避免全身麻醉的术后并发症。尽管局部麻醉是患者的一种选择,但最近的一项大型数据库研究发现,高达90%的病例仍在全身麻醉下进行。我们研究的目的是进一步评估支持局部麻醉与全身麻醉在手术结果上是否存在显著差异。方法:这是一项单机构回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受下肢截肢的患者。包括膝上下截肢,所有截肢均由血管外科医生进行。根据麻醉类型将患者分为三组:全身麻醉、全身和局部阻滞、仅局部阻滞。然后对每组的患者特征、术前合并症和术后结果进行研究。连续变量用中位数和四分位数范围(IQRs)来总结,而分类变量用频率和百分比来总结。由于对多例患者进行了重复测量,因此拟合以麻醉组为反应的GEE(广义估计方程)模型来评估麻醉组之间的差异。采用二项分布、泊松分布或多项分布拟合多变量模型。结果:本研究共纳入176例截肢患者,其中仅局部阻滞55例(35%),全麻加阻滞94例(60%),单纯全麻27例(15%)。在研究中,74例(42%)患者进行了膝上截肢,102例(58%)患者进行了膝下截肢。单纯阻滞组与老年人群显著相关(p = 0.006),与较高的CHF (p = 0.001)、CKD (p = 0.006)和糖尿病(p = 0.002)比例显著相关。普通组术后发病率更高,PE (p < 0.001)、DVT (p < 0.001)、肺炎(p = 0.032)和术后呼吸机使用(p < 0.001)的比例均显著高于普通组。普通组的住院时间明显延长(p = 0.03),过期率明显提高(p = 0.002)。在多变量分析中,仅接受全身麻醉与30天(p=0.009)、60天(p=0.009)和1年死亡率(p= 0.006)显著相关。结论:我们的研究表明,全麻用于下肢截肢与较高的30天、60天和1年死亡率有显著且独立的相关性。因此,对于面临下肢截肢的患者,应继续转向局部阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信