Outcome of Clavicle Fractures Treated by Various Modalities.

M T Ganesh, Haemanath Pandian, Aizel Sherief Palasseril
{"title":"Outcome of Clavicle Fractures Treated by Various Modalities.","authors":"M T Ganesh, Haemanath Pandian, Aizel Sherief Palasseril","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i06.5728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clavicle fractures account for a significant proportion of shoulder girdle injuries, with varying treatment modalities employed, ranging from conservative management to surgical intervention. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of clavicle fractures treated conservatively versus those treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients with clavicle fractures treated between 2019 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients were categorized into two groups: </strong>those receiving conservative treatment (n = 52) and those undergoing surgical intervention (n = 42), which included intramedullary fixation using titanium elastic nail system (TENS) and plate and screw fixation. Clinical and radiological data were collected, and outcomes were assessed based on union rates, complications, and functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average time to solid union was 3 months, with conservative treatment yielding a mean of 4.9 weeks for middle-third fractures and 5.8 weeks for lateral-third fractures. The surgical group showed slightly longer healing times (mean 9.3 weeks for middle-third fractures and 10.2 weeks for lateral-third fractures) but achieved higher union rates, with only 2 cases (4.76%) of non-union in the TENS group. In contrast, the conservative group had a non-union rate of 7.69%, predominantly in lateral-third fractures. Malunion occurred in 85% of conservatively treated cases, yet functional impairments were minimal. Surgical intervention resulted in no reported deformities or significant functional deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While conservative treatment is effective for non-displaced fractures, surgical intervention offers significant advantages for displaced fractures, particularly in achieving higher union rates and better functional outcomes. This study reinforces the importance of personalized treatment strategies, emphasizing surgical management in cases of displacement or comminution to minimize complications and improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 6","pages":"250-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i06.5728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clavicle fractures account for a significant proportion of shoulder girdle injuries, with varying treatment modalities employed, ranging from conservative management to surgical intervention. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of clavicle fractures treated conservatively versus those treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients with clavicle fractures treated between 2019 and 2023.

Patients were categorized into two groups: those receiving conservative treatment (n = 52) and those undergoing surgical intervention (n = 42), which included intramedullary fixation using titanium elastic nail system (TENS) and plate and screw fixation. Clinical and radiological data were collected, and outcomes were assessed based on union rates, complications, and functional recovery.

Results: The average time to solid union was 3 months, with conservative treatment yielding a mean of 4.9 weeks for middle-third fractures and 5.8 weeks for lateral-third fractures. The surgical group showed slightly longer healing times (mean 9.3 weeks for middle-third fractures and 10.2 weeks for lateral-third fractures) but achieved higher union rates, with only 2 cases (4.76%) of non-union in the TENS group. In contrast, the conservative group had a non-union rate of 7.69%, predominantly in lateral-third fractures. Malunion occurred in 85% of conservatively treated cases, yet functional impairments were minimal. Surgical intervention resulted in no reported deformities or significant functional deficits.

Conclusions: While conservative treatment is effective for non-displaced fractures, surgical intervention offers significant advantages for displaced fractures, particularly in achieving higher union rates and better functional outcomes. This study reinforces the importance of personalized treatment strategies, emphasizing surgical management in cases of displacement or comminution to minimize complications and improve patient satisfaction.

不同方式治疗锁骨骨折的疗效。
锁骨骨折在肩带损伤中占很大比例,采用不同的治疗方式,从保守管理到手术干预。本研究旨在评估锁骨骨折保守治疗与切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗的结果。材料与方法:对2019 - 2023年收治的94例锁骨骨折患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为保守治疗组(n = 52)和手术治疗组(n = 42),手术治疗组采用钛弹性钉系统(TENS)髓内固定和钢板螺钉固定。收集临床和放射学资料,并根据愈合率、并发症和功能恢复评估结果。结果:平均愈合时间为3个月,保守治疗中三分之一骨折平均为4.9周,外侧三分之一骨折平均为5.8周。手术组愈合时间稍长(中三分之一骨折平均9.3周,外侧三分之一骨折平均10.2周),但愈合率较高,TENS组仅有2例(4.76%)骨折不愈合。相比之下,保守组的不愈合率为7.69%,主要发生在外侧三分之一骨折。85%的保守治疗病例发生骨不愈合,但功能损伤很小。手术干预没有导致畸形或显著功能缺陷的报道。结论:保守治疗对于非移位性骨折是有效的,手术治疗对于移位性骨折具有明显的优势,特别是在获得更高的愈合率和更好的功能预后方面。本研究强调了个性化治疗策略的重要性,强调了移位或粉碎病例的外科治疗,以减少并发症并提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信