{"title":"The effectiveness and safety of administering antiplatelet medications following reperfusion therapy in patients with ischemic stroke.","authors":"Xiaoning Ju, Ningfen Wang, Yubin Wu, Guoqing Wang","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2521371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although reperfusion therapy enhances patient outcomes, the ideal antiplatelet regimen post-treatment remains unclear. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT) in ischemic stroke patients after reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on 730 patients treated at a single institution from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) or TAT (aspirin, clopidogrel, and tirofiban). Outcomes included neurological improvement via NIHSS scores, functional recovery using mRS, and bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TAT demonstrated significantly better neurological recovery, with more patients achieving NIHSS ≤ 3 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). All TAT patients had mRS ≤ 2 at 30 days. However, TAT was associated with higher bleeding rates (37.4% vs. 18.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Intravenous thrombolysis increased bleeding risk (OR = 3.95, 95% CI: 1.26-12.44, <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAT may enhance neurological recovery but increases bleeding risk. Patient selection and monitoring are crucial, and long-term studies are needed to fully evaluate its risk-benefit profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2521371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ischemic stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although reperfusion therapy enhances patient outcomes, the ideal antiplatelet regimen post-treatment remains unclear. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT) in ischemic stroke patients after reperfusion.
Research design and methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on 730 patients treated at a single institution from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) or TAT (aspirin, clopidogrel, and tirofiban). Outcomes included neurological improvement via NIHSS scores, functional recovery using mRS, and bleeding complications.
Results: TAT demonstrated significantly better neurological recovery, with more patients achieving NIHSS ≤ 3 (p < 0.001). All TAT patients had mRS ≤ 2 at 30 days. However, TAT was associated with higher bleeding rates (37.4% vs. 18.8%, p < 0.05). Intravenous thrombolysis increased bleeding risk (OR = 3.95, 95% CI: 1.26-12.44, p = 0.02).
Conclusion: TAT may enhance neurological recovery but increases bleeding risk. Patient selection and monitoring are crucial, and long-term studies are needed to fully evaluate its risk-benefit profile.
背景:缺血性脑卒中是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因。尽管再灌注治疗提高了患者的预后,但治疗后理想的抗血小板方案仍不清楚。本研究探讨了双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)与三重抗血小板治疗(TAT)在缺血性脑卒中再灌注后的疗效和安全性。研究设计与方法:回顾性观察分析2018年1月至2023年12月在同一医院治疗的730例患者。患者分为两组:DAPT(阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)或TAT(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和替罗非班)。结果包括NIHSS评分的神经系统改善、mRS功能恢复和出血并发症。结果:TAT能显著改善神经功能恢复,NIHSS≤3的患者较多(p p p = 0.02)。结论:TAT可促进神经功能恢复,但增加出血风险。患者选择和监测是至关重要的,需要长期研究来充分评估其风险-收益概况。
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.