Recommendations for Accurate Target Expression Evaluation by Quantitative Flow Cytometry.

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Cytometry Part A Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.24943
Tamara Lekishvili, Maxime Moulard, Sarah Jetzer, Alisa Kirkin, Teresa Maria Frasconi, Gülsah Celik, Anne Goubier, Amelie Croset
{"title":"Recommendations for Accurate Target Expression Evaluation by Quantitative Flow Cytometry.","authors":"Tamara Lekishvili, Maxime Moulard, Sarah Jetzer, Alisa Kirkin, Teresa Maria Frasconi, Gülsah Celik, Anne Goubier, Amelie Croset","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among various cellular characteristics, flow cytometry can evaluate antigen expression through qualitative or quantitative approaches. For relative quantification, fluorescence intensity (FI) values are converted into quantitative measurements using appropriate reference materials. To quantitatively estimate antigen density or define ligand-binding sites per cell, antibody binding capacity (ABC) values serve as the preferred metric. Standardizing assays through the conversion of arbitrary FI units into quantitative data is essential for consistency. However, reported ABC values for well-characterized antigens vary across the literature. This study addresses the challenges in achieving robust and reproducible quantitative flow cytometry data, offering methodological recommendations for accurately assessing target expression. Our research includes a comprehensive investigation of multiple factors, such as conventional and full-spectrum instruments, antibodies, reagents, matrices, cell density/confluency, cellular autofluorescence, and quantitative kits, to identify the primary sources of variation in ABC calculations. By implementing a systematic and integrated approach, we aim to ensure the generation of reliable and reproducible ABC values. Longitudinal studies provide strong evidence of assay robustness, while the established protocol further supports biomarker evaluation across different matrices and various stages of drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":" ","pages":"423-437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among various cellular characteristics, flow cytometry can evaluate antigen expression through qualitative or quantitative approaches. For relative quantification, fluorescence intensity (FI) values are converted into quantitative measurements using appropriate reference materials. To quantitatively estimate antigen density or define ligand-binding sites per cell, antibody binding capacity (ABC) values serve as the preferred metric. Standardizing assays through the conversion of arbitrary FI units into quantitative data is essential for consistency. However, reported ABC values for well-characterized antigens vary across the literature. This study addresses the challenges in achieving robust and reproducible quantitative flow cytometry data, offering methodological recommendations for accurately assessing target expression. Our research includes a comprehensive investigation of multiple factors, such as conventional and full-spectrum instruments, antibodies, reagents, matrices, cell density/confluency, cellular autofluorescence, and quantitative kits, to identify the primary sources of variation in ABC calculations. By implementing a systematic and integrated approach, we aim to ensure the generation of reliable and reproducible ABC values. Longitudinal studies provide strong evidence of assay robustness, while the established protocol further supports biomarker evaluation across different matrices and various stages of drug development.

定量流式细胞术准确评价靶蛋白表达的建议。
在各种细胞特征中,流式细胞术可以通过定性或定量的方法来评价抗原的表达。相对定量,荧光强度(FI)值转换成定量测量使用适当的参考物质。为了定量估计抗原密度或确定每个细胞的配体结合位点,抗体结合能力(ABC)值是首选的度量。通过将任意FI单位转换为定量数据来标准化检测对于一致性至关重要。然而,各文献报道的特征抗原的ABC值各不相同。本研究解决了实现稳健和可重复的定量流式细胞术数据的挑战,为准确评估靶表达提供了方法学建议。我们的研究包括对多种因素的全面调查,如常规和全光谱仪器、抗体、试剂、基质、细胞密度/合流性、细胞自身荧光和定量试剂盒,以确定ABC计算变化的主要来源。通过实施系统和综合的方法,我们的目标是确保生成可靠和可重复的ABC值。纵向研究为分析稳健性提供了强有力的证据,而建立的方案进一步支持跨不同基质和药物开发不同阶段的生物标志物评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信