Multidisciplinary collaborative approach to cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in cancer patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a clinical efficacy and safety analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-05-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/UVQC5990
Ming Yao, Li Zhang, Meng Ai, Haiyan Chen, Lu Zhang, Yanshun Wei, Dandan Wang, Yajie Jia
{"title":"Multidisciplinary collaborative approach to cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in cancer patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a clinical efficacy and safety analysis.","authors":"Ming Yao, Li Zhang, Meng Ai, Haiyan Chen, Lu Zhang, Yanshun Wei, Dandan Wang, Yajie Jia","doi":"10.62347/UVQC5990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation model in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and June 2023, 80 ICU patients were enrolled: 40 received standard cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (control group), and 40 underwent MDT-based rehabilitation (observation group). Outcome measures included ICU-AW incidence, muscle strength Medical Research Council (MRC) scores, upper/lower limb strength, Barthel Index Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, duration of ICU and hospital stay, mechanical ventilation time, complications, and patient satisfaction. Predictive variables for ICU-AW were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On days 4 and 7 post-intervention, ICU-AW incidence was significantly lower in the observation group (both P < 0.05). MRC scores, limb muscle strength, Barthel Index, and satisfaction were significantly higher in the observation group (all P < 0.05), while SOFA, APACHE II scores, ICU stay, hospital stay, and ventilation duration were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). SOFA scores declined from day 5, with lower values in the observation group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The risk of ICU-AW in the observation group was a significant reduction in risk than in the control group (OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.005-0.606, P = 0.017). No significant differences in complications were observed (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDT-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation significantly improves muscle strength, functional status, and patient satisfaction, while reducing ICU-AW incidence, ICU and hospital stay, and ventilation duration. These findings support its broader clinical application in ICU-AW management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 5","pages":"2427-2438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/UVQC5990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation model in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW).

Methods: Between January 2020 and June 2023, 80 ICU patients were enrolled: 40 received standard cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (control group), and 40 underwent MDT-based rehabilitation (observation group). Outcome measures included ICU-AW incidence, muscle strength Medical Research Council (MRC) scores, upper/lower limb strength, Barthel Index Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, duration of ICU and hospital stay, mechanical ventilation time, complications, and patient satisfaction. Predictive variables for ICU-AW were also analyzed.

Results: On days 4 and 7 post-intervention, ICU-AW incidence was significantly lower in the observation group (both P < 0.05). MRC scores, limb muscle strength, Barthel Index, and satisfaction were significantly higher in the observation group (all P < 0.05), while SOFA, APACHE II scores, ICU stay, hospital stay, and ventilation duration were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). SOFA scores declined from day 5, with lower values in the observation group (P < 0.05). The risk of ICU-AW in the observation group was a significant reduction in risk than in the control group (OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.005-0.606, P = 0.017). No significant differences in complications were observed (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: MDT-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation significantly improves muscle strength, functional status, and patient satisfaction, while reducing ICU-AW incidence, ICU and hospital stay, and ventilation duration. These findings support its broader clinical application in ICU-AW management.

多学科合作方法对重症监护病房获得性虚弱的癌症患者进行心肺康复:临床疗效和安全性分析。
目的:评价一种基于多学科团队(MDT)的心肺康复模式在重症监护病房获得性虚弱(ICU-AW)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:2020年1月至2023年6月,纳入80例ICU患者:40例接受标准心肺康复(对照组),40例接受基于mdt的康复(观察组)。结果测量包括ICU- aw发生率、肌肉力量医学研究委员会(MRC)评分、上肢/下肢力量、Barthel指数序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE) II评分、ICU和住院时间、机械通气时间、并发症和患者满意度。对ICU-AW的预测变量也进行了分析。结果:干预后第4、7天,观察组ICU-AW发生率显著降低(P < 0.05)。观察组患者MRC评分、肢体肌力、Barthel指数、满意度均显著高于对照组(P < 0.05), SOFA评分、APACHEⅱ评分、ICU住院时间、住院时间、通气时间均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。SOFA评分从第5天开始下降,观察组评分较低(P < 0.05)。观察组ICU-AW风险显著低于对照组(OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.005 ~ 0.606, P = 0.017)。并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:基于mdt的心肺康复可显著改善肌力、功能状态和患者满意度,同时减少ICU- aw发生率、ICU和住院时间以及通气时间。这些发现支持其在ICU-AW管理中更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信