Effect of saroglitazar on glycaemic parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Luis E Simental-Mendía, Mario Simental-Mendía, Laura Jazel Barragán-Zuñiga, Mariana Arce-Quiñones
{"title":"Effect of saroglitazar on glycaemic parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Luis E Simental-Mendía, Mario Simental-Mendía, Laura Jazel Barragán-Zuñiga, Mariana Arce-Quiñones","doi":"10.1111/dom.16506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Saroglitazar is a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), predominantly a PPAR-α agonist and a moderate PPAR-γ agonist activity, which has shown positive effects in diabetic dyslipidaemia. However, its potential anti-diabetic effect has not been thoroughly investigated, and the data have been inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the impact of saroglitazar on glycaemic markers in patients with dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar databases. Randomized controlled trials reporting changes in glycaemic parameters after saroglitazar therapy were selected. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 was used to assess the quality of the included studies. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model and the generic inverse variance method were conducted. Also, the leave-one-out method was applied for the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 clinical trials (N = 2077; mean age: 49.7 years; 40% female) were included. Regarding the quality of the included studies, two trials had a low risk of bias, seven trials showed some concerns and one study exhibited a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials showed that saroglitazar significantly reduces fasting glucose (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -12.11 mg/dL, 95% CI: -14.79, -9.43, p < 0.0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 40%), postprandial glucose (WMD: -16.17 mg/dL, 95% CI: -22.29, -10.04, p < 0.0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and HbA1c (WMD: -0.39%, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.22, p < 0.0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 72%) compared to active control or placebo. However, there was no significant effect on insulin levels (WMD: -1.03 μU/mL, 95% CI: -4.12, 2.06, p = 0.51, I<sup>2</sup> = 37%), HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.86, 0.04, p = 0.07, I<sup>2</sup> = 41%) and C-peptide (WMD: -0.30 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.76, 0.15, p = 0.19, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) after saroglitazar therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results revealed that saroglitazar therapy improves glycaemic parameters through the reduction of fasting glucose, postprandial glucose and HbA1c.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Saroglitazar is a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), predominantly a PPAR-α agonist and a moderate PPAR-γ agonist activity, which has shown positive effects in diabetic dyslipidaemia. However, its potential anti-diabetic effect has not been thoroughly investigated, and the data have been inconsistent. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the impact of saroglitazar on glycaemic markers in patients with dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Materials and methods: The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar databases. Randomized controlled trials reporting changes in glycaemic parameters after saroglitazar therapy were selected. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 was used to assess the quality of the included studies. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model and the generic inverse variance method were conducted. Also, the leave-one-out method was applied for the sensitivity analysis.

Results: A total of 10 clinical trials (N = 2077; mean age: 49.7 years; 40% female) were included. Regarding the quality of the included studies, two trials had a low risk of bias, seven trials showed some concerns and one study exhibited a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials showed that saroglitazar significantly reduces fasting glucose (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -12.11 mg/dL, 95% CI: -14.79, -9.43, p < 0.0001, I2 = 40%), postprandial glucose (WMD: -16.17 mg/dL, 95% CI: -22.29, -10.04, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) and HbA1c (WMD: -0.39%, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.22, p < 0.0001, I2 = 72%) compared to active control or placebo. However, there was no significant effect on insulin levels (WMD: -1.03 μU/mL, 95% CI: -4.12, 2.06, p = 0.51, I2 = 37%), HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.86, 0.04, p = 0.07, I2 = 41%) and C-peptide (WMD: -0.30 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.76, 0.15, p = 0.19, I2 = 0%) after saroglitazar therapy.

Conclusions: Our results revealed that saroglitazar therapy improves glycaemic parameters through the reduction of fasting glucose, postprandial glucose and HbA1c.

沙格列他对血糖参数的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:沙格列他是一种双过氧化物酶体增殖因子激活受体(PPAR),主要是PPAR-α激动剂和PPAR-γ激动剂,在糖尿病性血脂异常中显示出积极的作用。然而,其潜在的抗糖尿病作用尚未得到彻底的研究,数据也不一致。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以检查沙格列他对血脂异常、2型糖尿病和非酒精性脂肪肝患者的血糖标志物的影响。材料和方法:在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov和谷歌Scholar数据库中进行检索。选择报告沙格列他治疗后血糖参数变化的随机对照试验。Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具第2版用于评估纳入研究的质量。meta分析采用随机效应模型和通用逆方差法。采用留一法进行敏感性分析。结果:共纳入10项临床试验(N = 2077;平均年龄49.7岁;40%为女性)。关于纳入研究的质量,2项试验有低偏倚风险,7项试验有一定的关注,1项研究有高偏倚风险。10项随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,与活性对照组或安慰剂相比,沙格列他显著降低了空腹血糖(加权平均差[WMD]: -12.11 mg/dL, 95% CI: -14.79, -9.43, p 2 = 40%)、餐后血糖(WMD: -16.17 mg/dL, 95% CI: -22.29, -10.04, p 2 = 0%)和HbA1c (WMD: -0.39%, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.22, p 2 = 72%)。然而,对胰岛素水平(WMD: -1.03 μU/mL, 95% CI: -4.12, 2.06, p = 0.51, I2 = 37%)、HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.86, 0.04, p = 0.07, I2 = 41%)和c -肽(WMD: -0.30 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.76, 0.15, p = 0.19, I2 = 0%)治疗后无显著影响。结论:我们的研究结果显示,沙格列他治疗通过降低空腹血糖、餐后血糖和HbA1c来改善血糖参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信