POLATUZUMAB VEDOTIN, RITUXIMAB, GEMCITABINE AND OXALIPLATIN (POLA-R-GEMOX) FOR RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA (DLBCL): PHASE III POLARGO TRIAL

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
J. Sancho, Z. Li, T. P. Vassilakopoulos, A. Viardot, A. McMillan, M. Sinan Dal, J. Pereira, J. S. Kim, L. Qiu, C. L. Batlevi, R. Ibrahim, J. Hernandez, B. McCall, Y. Jiang, M. Yan, W. Harris, L. Musick, C. Haioun, M. Matasar
{"title":"POLATUZUMAB VEDOTIN, RITUXIMAB, GEMCITABINE AND OXALIPLATIN (POLA-R-GEMOX) FOR RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA (DLBCL): PHASE III POLARGO TRIAL","authors":"J. Sancho,&nbsp;Z. Li,&nbsp;T. P. Vassilakopoulos,&nbsp;A. Viardot,&nbsp;A. McMillan,&nbsp;M. Sinan Dal,&nbsp;J. Pereira,&nbsp;J. S. Kim,&nbsp;L. Qiu,&nbsp;C. L. Batlevi,&nbsp;R. Ibrahim,&nbsp;J. Hernandez,&nbsp;B. McCall,&nbsp;Y. Jiang,&nbsp;M. Yan,&nbsp;W. Harris,&nbsp;L. Musick,&nbsp;C. Haioun,&nbsp;M. Matasar","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Introduction:</b> Polatuzumab vedotin is approved in frontline and R/R DLBCL; the latter involving combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Tilly et al. 2022; Sehn et al. 2019). Alternative treatments are needed for patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL. We present efficacy and safety results from the randomized cohort of the POLARGO trial (NCT04182204) evaluating Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥ 1 prior therapy.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Following a Pola-R-GemOx safety run-in (<i>n</i> = 15), pts with R/R DLBCL (not otherwise specified [NOS] or transformed indolent lymphoma) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant were randomized 1:1 to receive polatuzumab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg) plus R-GemOx (R, 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; Gem, 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>; Ox, 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) or R-GemOx alone every 21 days for ≤ 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and independent review committee-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) at end of treatment (EOT) by PET-CT.</p><p><b>Results:</b> In total, 270 pts with DLBCL were enrolled (median age 66 [range 20–89] years), including 176 (65.2%) pts after 1 prior therapy. Of 246 pts with DLBCL NOS, 143 (58.1%) had primary refractory disease. As of Nov 29, 2024, in the randomized cohort (<i>N</i> = 255; median OS follow-up 24.6 months), a statistically significant OS benefit was observed with Pola-R-GemOx (<i>n</i> = 129) versus R-GemOx (<i>n</i> = 126; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.83; <i>p</i> = 0.0017; Figure). Median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI: 13.3–not evaluable) for Pola-R-GemOx versus 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.9–15.8) for R-GemOx. OS benefit was consistent across most subgroups, including ABC (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.3–0.9) and GCB (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.3–0.9) subtypes by gene expression profiling. Key secondary endpoints are shown in the Table. In the safety-evaluable pts (Pola-R-GemOx, <i>n</i> = 128; R-GemOx, <i>n</i> = 125), median number of cycles received was higher with Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx (7.5 versus 4.0) and Grade (Gr) 3–4 adverse event (AE) rates were similar (57.0% versus 58.4%), with higher rates of thrombocytopenia (34.4% versus 26.4%) and infections (14.1% versus 8.0%) with Pola-R-GemOx. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was more common with Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx (57.0% versus 28.8%); primarily Gr 1 (37.5% versus 23.2%). Five pts had Gr 3 PN in the Pola-R-GemOx arm. Treatment discontinuation rates due to AEs were higher with Pola-R-GemOx (23.4%) versus R-GemOx (8.0%). Gr 5 AEs were higher with Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx (11.7% versus 4.0%), primarily driven by infections including COVID-19.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Pola-R-GemOx demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in OS and PFS, with a 40% reduction in risk of death relative to R-GemOx. Pola-R-GemOx is an alternative treatment option for pts with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL not previously exposed to polatuzumab vedotin, which avoids the risk of T-cell depleting regimens and their potential deleterious effects on subsequent therapies.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> The POLARGO study was sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Third-party editorial assistance, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Anna Nagy, BSc, of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.</p><p><b>Encore Abstract:</b> EHA 2025</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; combination therapies</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>J. Sancho</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, BeiGene, Roche, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Celgene, Incyte, Sobi, Miltenyi-Biomedicine</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, BeiGene, Roche, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Celgene, Incyte</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> Roche</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Speaker's bureau: Gilead-Kite, BeiGene, AbbVie</p><p><b>T. P. Vassilakopoulos</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Genesis Pharma, AbbVie, Merck, Gilead, Sandoz, Teva, AstraZeneca, Winmedica, Sobi, Swixx</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Takeda, Roche, Genesis Pharma, Merck, Glaxo, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Sandoz, Lilly, Janssen, Sobi, Swixx (all via institution)</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> Takeda, Roche, Genesis Pharma, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Vianex, Winmedica, Swixx, Faran</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Research funding: Merck, Roche, AbbVie, BMS, Karyopharm (all via institution)</p><p><b>A. Viardot</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AbbVie, Roche, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Kite/Gilead, Incyte</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche Pharma AG, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Kite/Gilead, Incyte</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> Sobi, Janssen (Johnson &amp; Johnson), BMS, AbbVie, Kite/Gilead</p><p><b>A. McMillan</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Amgen, Sobi</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Amgen, Sobi</p><p><b>L. Qiu</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> BeiGene, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Johnson &amp; Johnson</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> BeiGene, Pfizer, Johnson &amp; Johnson, AstraZeneca, Sanofi</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Speaker's bureau: Roche, BeiGene, Pfizer, Johnson &amp; Johnson, AstraZeneca, Sanofi</p><p><b>C. L. Batlevi</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Roche/Genentech</p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> BMS, Seattle Genetics, Kite, Karyopharm, TG Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics, AbbVie, Genentech, Treeline Bioscience</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Roche</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Dava Oncology, TouchIME, Medscape</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Research funding: Epizyme, Autolus, Roche, Vincerx</p><p><b>R. Ibrahim</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Genentech, Inc. (contractor)</p><p><b>J. Hernandez</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd</p><p><b>B. McCall</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Genentech/Roche</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Roche</p><p><b>Y. Jiang</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Roche/Genentech</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Roche</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> Roche</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: Roche</p><p><b>M. Yan</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Hoffmann-La Roche</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Hoffmann-La Roche</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: Hoffmann-La Roche</p><p><b>W. Harris</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Genentech, Inc.</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Roche</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: Genentech, Inc.</p><p><b>L. Musick</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (both author and spouse are employees—within the past 2 years)</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer; spouse: Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis, UCB</p><p><b>C. Haioun</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Gilead, Incyte, AbbVie, Takeda, BeiGene, MSD</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche, Gilead, Incyte, AbbVie, Takeda, BeiGene, MSD</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> Janssen, Roche</p><p><b>M. Matasar</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Bayer, Genentech, Kite, Roche, Seattle Genetics</p><p><b>Stock ownership:</b> Merck</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Epizyme, IMV Therapeutics, Johnson &amp; Johnson, Kite, Regeneron, Roche, Pfizer</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Research funding: Seattle Genetics, Roche, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Johnson &amp; Johnson, Bayer</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70093_7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Polatuzumab vedotin is approved in frontline and R/R DLBCL; the latter involving combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Tilly et al. 2022; Sehn et al. 2019). Alternative treatments are needed for patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL. We present efficacy and safety results from the randomized cohort of the POLARGO trial (NCT04182204) evaluating Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx in pts with R/R DLBCL after ≥ 1 prior therapy.

Methods: Following a Pola-R-GemOx safety run-in (n = 15), pts with R/R DLBCL (not otherwise specified [NOS] or transformed indolent lymphoma) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant were randomized 1:1 to receive polatuzumab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg) plus R-GemOx (R, 375 mg/m2; Gem, 1000 mg/m2; Ox, 100 mg/m2) or R-GemOx alone every 21 days for ≤ 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and independent review committee-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) at end of treatment (EOT) by PET-CT.

Results: In total, 270 pts with DLBCL were enrolled (median age 66 [range 20–89] years), including 176 (65.2%) pts after 1 prior therapy. Of 246 pts with DLBCL NOS, 143 (58.1%) had primary refractory disease. As of Nov 29, 2024, in the randomized cohort (N = 255; median OS follow-up 24.6 months), a statistically significant OS benefit was observed with Pola-R-GemOx (n = 129) versus R-GemOx (n = 126; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.83; p = 0.0017; Figure). Median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI: 13.3–not evaluable) for Pola-R-GemOx versus 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.9–15.8) for R-GemOx. OS benefit was consistent across most subgroups, including ABC (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.3–0.9) and GCB (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.3–0.9) subtypes by gene expression profiling. Key secondary endpoints are shown in the Table. In the safety-evaluable pts (Pola-R-GemOx, n = 128; R-GemOx, n = 125), median number of cycles received was higher with Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx (7.5 versus 4.0) and Grade (Gr) 3–4 adverse event (AE) rates were similar (57.0% versus 58.4%), with higher rates of thrombocytopenia (34.4% versus 26.4%) and infections (14.1% versus 8.0%) with Pola-R-GemOx. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was more common with Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx (57.0% versus 28.8%); primarily Gr 1 (37.5% versus 23.2%). Five pts had Gr 3 PN in the Pola-R-GemOx arm. Treatment discontinuation rates due to AEs were higher with Pola-R-GemOx (23.4%) versus R-GemOx (8.0%). Gr 5 AEs were higher with Pola-R-GemOx versus R-GemOx (11.7% versus 4.0%), primarily driven by infections including COVID-19.

Conclusion: Pola-R-GemOx demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in OS and PFS, with a 40% reduction in risk of death relative to R-GemOx. Pola-R-GemOx is an alternative treatment option for pts with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL not previously exposed to polatuzumab vedotin, which avoids the risk of T-cell depleting regimens and their potential deleterious effects on subsequent therapies.

Research funding declaration: The POLARGO study was sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Third-party editorial assistance, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Anna Nagy, BSc, of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Encore Abstract: EHA 2025

Keywords: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; combination therapies

Potential sources of conflict of interest:

J. Sancho

Consultant or advisory role: Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, BeiGene, Roche, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Celgene, Incyte, Sobi, Miltenyi-Biomedicine

Honoraria: Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, BeiGene, Roche, Gilead-Kite, BMS-Celgene, Incyte

Educational grants: Roche

Other remuneration: Speaker's bureau: Gilead-Kite, BeiGene, AbbVie

T. P. Vassilakopoulos

Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Genesis Pharma, AbbVie, Merck, Gilead, Sandoz, Teva, AstraZeneca, Winmedica, Sobi, Swixx

Honoraria: Takeda, Roche, Genesis Pharma, Merck, Glaxo, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Sandoz, Lilly, Janssen, Sobi, Swixx (all via institution)

Educational grants: Takeda, Roche, Genesis Pharma, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Vianex, Winmedica, Swixx, Faran

Other remuneration: Research funding: Merck, Roche, AbbVie, BMS, Karyopharm (all via institution)

A. Viardot

Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, Roche, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Kite/Gilead, Incyte

Honoraria: Roche Pharma AG, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Kite/Gilead, Incyte

Educational grants: Sobi, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), BMS, AbbVie, Kite/Gilead

A. McMillan

Consultant or advisory role: Amgen, Sobi

Honoraria: Amgen, Sobi

L. Qiu

Consultant or advisory role: BeiGene, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson

Educational grants: BeiGene, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Sanofi

Other remuneration: Speaker's bureau: Roche, BeiGene, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Sanofi

C. L. Batlevi

Employment or leadership position: Roche/Genentech

Consultant or advisory role: BMS, Seattle Genetics, Kite, Karyopharm, TG Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics, AbbVie, Genentech, Treeline Bioscience

Stock ownership: Roche

Honoraria: Dava Oncology, TouchIME, Medscape

Other remuneration: Research funding: Epizyme, Autolus, Roche, Vincerx

R. Ibrahim

Employment or leadership position: Genentech, Inc. (contractor)

J. Hernandez

Employment or leadership position: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

Stock ownership: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

Honoraria: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

Educational grants: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

B. McCall

Employment or leadership position: Genentech/Roche

Stock ownership: Roche

Y. Jiang

Employment or leadership position: Roche/Genentech

Stock ownership: Roche

Educational grants: Roche

Other remuneration: Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: Roche

M. Yan

Employment or leadership position: Hoffmann-La Roche

Stock ownership: Hoffmann-La Roche

Other remuneration: Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: Hoffmann-La Roche

W. Harris

Employment or leadership position: Genentech, Inc.

Stock ownership: Roche

Other remuneration: Patents, royalties, other intellectual property: Genentech, Inc.

L. Musick

Employment or leadership position: Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (both author and spouse are employees—within the past 2 years)

Stock ownership: Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer; spouse: Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis, UCB

C. Haioun

Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Gilead, Incyte, AbbVie, Takeda, BeiGene, MSD

Honoraria: Roche, Gilead, Incyte, AbbVie, Takeda, BeiGene, MSD

Educational grants: Janssen, Roche

M. Matasar

Consultant or advisory role: Bayer, Genentech, Kite, Roche, Seattle Genetics

Stock ownership: Merck

Honoraria: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Epizyme, IMV Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Kite, Regeneron, Roche, Pfizer

Other remuneration: Research funding: Seattle Genetics, Roche, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer

Abstract Image

Polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab,吉西他滨和奥沙利铂(pola-r-gemox)治疗复发/难治性(r / r)弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(dlbcl): iii期polargo试验
Polatuzumab vedotin获批用于一线和R/R DLBCL;后者涉及苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗联合(Tilly等,2022;Sehn et al. 2019)。复发/复发DLBCL患者(pts)需要替代治疗。我们报告了polgo试验(NCT04182204)随机队列的疗效和安全性结果,该试验评估了Pola-R-GemOx与R- gemox在既往治疗≥1次的R/R DLBCL患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在Pola-R-GemOx安全性磨合(n = 15)后,不适合自体干细胞移植的R/R DLBCL(未指定[NOS]或转化惰性淋巴瘤)患者按1:1随机分组接受polatuzumab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg) + R- gemox (R, 375 mg/m2;宝石,1000 mg/m2;Ox, 100mg /m2)或R-GemOx单用,每21天一次,≤8个周期。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS),以及独立审查委员会评估的PET-CT治疗结束时的客观缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解率(CRR)。结果:共有270名DLBCL患者入组(中位年龄66岁[范围20-89]岁),其中176名(65.2%)患者接受过1次既往治疗。在246例DLBCL NOS患者中,143例(58.1%)有原发性难治性疾病。截至2024年11月29日,在随机队列中(N = 255;中位OS随访24.6个月),Pola-R-GemOx (n = 129)与R-GemOx (n = 126;风险比[HR] 0.60, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.43 ~ 0.83;P = 0.0017;图)。Pola-R-GemOx的中位生存期为19.5个月(95% CI: 13.3 -不可评估),而R-GemOx的中位生存期为12.5个月(95% CI: 8.9-15.8)。通过基因表达谱分析,大多数亚组的OS获益一致,包括ABC (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9)和GCB (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9)亚型。表中显示了关键的次要端点。在可安全评价的试验中(Pola-R-GemOx, n = 128;R-GemOx, n = 125), Pola-R-GemOx接受的中位周期数高于R-GemOx(7.5比4.0),3-4级不良事件(AE)率相似(57.0%比58.4%),Pola-R-GemOx的血小板减少率(34.4%比26.4%)和感染率(14.1%比8.0%)更高。周围神经病变(PN)在Pola-R-GemOx组比R-GemOx组更常见(57.0%比28.8%);主要是Gr 1 (37.5% vs 23.2%)。Pola-R-GemOx组中有5名患者出现了Gr - 3 PN。Pola-R-GemOx组因ae导致的停药率(23.4%)高于R-GemOx组(8.0%)。Pola-R-GemOx的Gr 5 ae高于R-GemOx(11.7%比4.0%),主要是由包括COVID-19在内的感染驱动的。结论:Pola-R-GemOx在OS和PFS中显示出具有统计学意义和临床意义的益处,相对于R-GemOx,死亡风险降低40%。Pola-R-GemOx是先前未暴露于polatuzumab vedotin的移植不符合条件的R/R DLBCL患者的替代治疗选择,可避免t细胞消耗方案的风险及其对后续治疗的潜在有害影响。研究经费声明:POLARGO研究由F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.赞助。在作者的指导下,第三方编辑协助由Inizio公司Ashfield MedComms的Anna Nagy理学士提供,并由F. Hoffmann-La Roche ltd .资助。潜在的利益冲突来源:J。顾问或顾问角色:礼来、艾伯维、杨森、百济神州、罗氏、吉来-凯特、BMS-Celgene、Incyte、Sobi、milteni - biomedicine荣誉:礼来、艾伯维、杨森、百济神州、罗氏、吉来-凯特、BMS-Celgene、Incyte教育资助:罗氏其他薪酬:演讲者局:吉来-凯特、贝济神州、艾伯维。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏、创世纪制药、艾伯维、默克、吉利德、山德士、Teva、阿斯利康、Winmedica、Sobi、Swixx荣誉:武田、罗氏、创世纪制药、默克、葛兰素、艾伯维、阿斯利康、吉利德、礼来、杨森、Sobi、Swixx(全部通过机构)教育资助:武田、罗氏、创世纪制药、艾伯维、阿斯利康、Vianex、Winmedica、Swixx、FaranOther薪酬:研究资助:默克、罗氏、艾伯维、BMS、Karyopharm(全部通过机构)viardot顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维、罗氏、阿斯利康、百济神州、BMS、Kite/Gilead、IncyteHonoraria:罗氏制药、艾伯维、阿斯利康、百济神州、BMS、Kite/Gilead、incyteeducation grants: Sobi、Janssen (Johnson &amp;强生、BMS、艾伯维、Kite/GileadA。顾问或顾问角色:Amgen, SobiHonoraria: Amgen, sobia。顾问或顾问角色:百济神州、辉瑞、阿斯利康、赛诺菲、强生;教育资助:百济神州、辉瑞、强生;其他报酬:演讲局:罗氏、百济神州、辉瑞、强生;强生,阿斯利康,赛诺菲。l。 工作或领导职位:罗氏/Genentech顾问或顾问角色:BMS, Seattle Genetics, Kite, Karyopharm, TG Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics, AbbVie, Genentech, Treeline bioscience股权:RocheHonoraria: Dava Oncology, TouchIME, medscape其他报酬:研究经费:Epizyme, Autolus,罗氏,VincerxR。就业或领导职位:Genentech, Inc.(承包商)hernandez工作或领导职位:F. Hoffmann-La Roche ltd .股权:F. Hoffmann-La Roche ltd .荣誉:F. Hoffmann-La Roche ltd .教育资助:F. Hoffmann-La Roche ltd .任职或领导职位:Genentech/ rochchock所有权:RocheY。工作或领导职位:罗氏/基因技术股份:罗氏教育补助金:罗氏其他报酬:专利、版税、其他知识产权:罗氏雇佣或领导职位:Hoffmann-La rocheock所有权:Hoffmann-La rochek其他报酬:专利,特许权使用费,其他知识产权:Hoffmann-La rochek。任职或领导职位:Genentech, inc .股权:rochee其他薪酬:专利,版税,其他知识产权:Genentech, Inc.L。任职或领导职位:Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd(作者及其配偶均为过去2年内的员工)持股:Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis, UCB, Pfizer;配偶:Genentech, Inc./F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis, UCBC。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏、吉利德、Incyte、艾伯维、武田、百济神州、msd荣誉:罗氏、吉利德、Incyte、艾伯维、武田、百济神州、msd教育资助:杨森、RocheM。顾问或顾问角色:Bayer, Genentech, Kite, Roche, Seattle genetics股权:MerckHonoraria: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Epizyme, IMV Therapeutics, Johnson &amp;其他报酬:研究经费:Seattle Genetics、Roche、pharmacyics、Genentech、Johnson &amp;约翰逊,拜耳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信