S. Ananth, J. Mallampet, B. Chang, N. Agarwal, K. Kong, B. Sahaf, C. Lohman, N. Hossain, J. C. Cancilla, A. Bukhari, E. Dean, J. Speigel, I. Kirsch, A. Jacob, H. Simmons, L. W. Lee, J. Bacigalupi, C. Mackall, A. Rapoport, M. D. Jain, S. Dahiya, F. L. Locke, D. Miklos, M. Frank
{"title":"MONITORING CIRUCLATING TUMOR DNA IMPROVES EARLY RELAPSE DETECTION AFTER STANDARD OF CARE 2L+ AXI-CEL IN LBCL: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY","authors":"S. Ananth, J. Mallampet, B. Chang, N. Agarwal, K. Kong, B. Sahaf, C. Lohman, N. Hossain, J. C. Cancilla, A. Bukhari, E. Dean, J. Speigel, I. Kirsch, A. Jacob, H. Simmons, L. W. Lee, J. Bacigalupi, C. Mackall, A. Rapoport, M. D. Jain, S. Dahiya, F. L. Locke, D. Miklos, M. Frank","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Introduction:</b> Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is a prognostic tool for outcomes following CD19-CAR T-cell therapy and frontline treatment. CtDNA can risk stratify and predict outcomes providing additive benefit to standard PET-CT assessments for 3L+ Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (axi-cel, Frank et al., <i>JCO</i> 2021). The role for ctDNA monitoring for 2L axi-cel is unknown. Here, we present a prospective ctDNA analysis of 2L+ axi-cel patients with 6+ months (mo) of follow-up and compare this analysis to prior 3L+ data.</p><p><b>Method:</b> Plasma was collected from patients with LBCL receiving standard-of-care axi-cel at pre-lymphodepletion (PLD), days 14, and 28, totaling 222 plasma samples. (VDJ) clonotype (Clono-Seq) was identified from archival paraffin-embedded tissue to track MRD. PET-CT scans were performed before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo post axi-cel; responses assessed per Lugano criteria (Deauville 1–3 was considered PET-negative). Any detectable ctDNA was considered detectable MRD. Significance for PFS was determined by log-rank <i>p</i> values and prognostic value of ctDNA was evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Patients in 2L+ (<i>n</i> = 84 enrolled 2022–2024) versus 3L+ (<i>n</i> = 64, enrolled 2018–2019) were median age of 65 (23–83) versus 59 (19–76), 61% versus 56% male, 55% versus 60% had elevated LDH, 73% versus 72% Stage 3/4, median 1 (1–5) versus 3 (1–7) prior lines (60% vs. 3% only 1 prior line; 12 % vs. 58% for 3+ prior lines). 60% (<i>n</i> = 50) versus 55% (<i>n</i> = 35) of 2L+ versus 3L+ patients received bridging. Median follow-up for 2L+ versus 3L+ was 18 versus 11 mo. Polatuzumab-based bridging (48% vs. 0%) was more common in 2L+; similar rates received radiation (36% vs. 26%). 2L+ versus 3L+ showed lower median PLD ctDNA levels (1.606307 [0–35,248] versus 63 [0–17,903] LG/mL) and a higher proportion of patients with undetectable MRD (uMRD) (38% vs. 26%) (Panel A). Lower levels of ctDNA suggests improved disease control and more effective bridging therapy in the 2L+ era.</p><p>For 2L+, ctDNA levels were prognostic before and at all time points in the early post-CAR-T setting. UMRD was associated with improved outcomes at all timepoints, including PLD (<i>p</i> = 0.04, HR 2.866, 1.287–6.382), Day 14 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001, HR 5.302, 2.342–12.00) and Day 28 (<i>p</i> = 0.001, HR 5.778, 2.606–12.81) (Panel A). PLD MRD levels did not associate with CRS or ICANS grade (not shown). MRD status at Day 14 and 28 stratified patients after 2L+ axi-cel (Panel B-C); uMRD was significantly associated with improved PFS. Patients with Day 28 radiographic PR/SD with uMRD (<i>n</i> = 12) versus detectable MRD (dMRD, <i>n</i> = 10) had improved PFS; 92% versus 40% of uMRD versus dMRD patients had durable remissions (panel D).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> This prospective study shows ctDNA assessments can predict for progression events with added value to standard PET-CT scans for patient receiving 2L+ axi-cel. Achieving uMRD as early as Day 14 after 2L+ axi-cel was strongly correlated with improved PFS.</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> Adaptive- Consultant</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> minimal residual disease; aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>S. Ananth</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Adaptive</p><p><b>I. Kirsch</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies</p><p><b>A. Jacob</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies</p><p><b>H. Simmons</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies</p><p><b>L. W. Lee</b></p><p><b>Employment or leadership position:</b> Adaptive Biotechnologies</p><p><b>M. D. Jain</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Kite</p><p><b>S. Dahiya</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Kite</p><p><b>F. L. Locke</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Adaptive, Kite</p><p><b>D. Miklos</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Adaptive, kite</p><p><b>M. Frank</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Adaptive, Kite</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_427","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70094_427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is a prognostic tool for outcomes following CD19-CAR T-cell therapy and frontline treatment. CtDNA can risk stratify and predict outcomes providing additive benefit to standard PET-CT assessments for 3L+ Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (axi-cel, Frank et al., JCO 2021). The role for ctDNA monitoring for 2L axi-cel is unknown. Here, we present a prospective ctDNA analysis of 2L+ axi-cel patients with 6+ months (mo) of follow-up and compare this analysis to prior 3L+ data.
Method: Plasma was collected from patients with LBCL receiving standard-of-care axi-cel at pre-lymphodepletion (PLD), days 14, and 28, totaling 222 plasma samples. (VDJ) clonotype (Clono-Seq) was identified from archival paraffin-embedded tissue to track MRD. PET-CT scans were performed before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo post axi-cel; responses assessed per Lugano criteria (Deauville 1–3 was considered PET-negative). Any detectable ctDNA was considered detectable MRD. Significance for PFS was determined by log-rank p values and prognostic value of ctDNA was evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Patients in 2L+ (n = 84 enrolled 2022–2024) versus 3L+ (n = 64, enrolled 2018–2019) were median age of 65 (23–83) versus 59 (19–76), 61% versus 56% male, 55% versus 60% had elevated LDH, 73% versus 72% Stage 3/4, median 1 (1–5) versus 3 (1–7) prior lines (60% vs. 3% only 1 prior line; 12 % vs. 58% for 3+ prior lines). 60% (n = 50) versus 55% (n = 35) of 2L+ versus 3L+ patients received bridging. Median follow-up for 2L+ versus 3L+ was 18 versus 11 mo. Polatuzumab-based bridging (48% vs. 0%) was more common in 2L+; similar rates received radiation (36% vs. 26%). 2L+ versus 3L+ showed lower median PLD ctDNA levels (1.606307 [0–35,248] versus 63 [0–17,903] LG/mL) and a higher proportion of patients with undetectable MRD (uMRD) (38% vs. 26%) (Panel A). Lower levels of ctDNA suggests improved disease control and more effective bridging therapy in the 2L+ era.
For 2L+, ctDNA levels were prognostic before and at all time points in the early post-CAR-T setting. UMRD was associated with improved outcomes at all timepoints, including PLD (p = 0.04, HR 2.866, 1.287–6.382), Day 14 (p < 0.0001, HR 5.302, 2.342–12.00) and Day 28 (p = 0.001, HR 5.778, 2.606–12.81) (Panel A). PLD MRD levels did not associate with CRS or ICANS grade (not shown). MRD status at Day 14 and 28 stratified patients after 2L+ axi-cel (Panel B-C); uMRD was significantly associated with improved PFS. Patients with Day 28 radiographic PR/SD with uMRD (n = 12) versus detectable MRD (dMRD, n = 10) had improved PFS; 92% versus 40% of uMRD versus dMRD patients had durable remissions (panel D).
Conclusion: This prospective study shows ctDNA assessments can predict for progression events with added value to standard PET-CT scans for patient receiving 2L+ axi-cel. Achieving uMRD as early as Day 14 after 2L+ axi-cel was strongly correlated with improved PFS.
期刊介绍:
Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged:
-Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders
-Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays
-Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases
-Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies
-Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems.
Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.