Coordinate Network Mapping of Focal Brain Volume Differences in ADHD Reveals Common Patterns That Lack Specificity: A Systematic Review

Juliana Wall, Gillian N. Miller, Joseph J. Taylor, Jacob L. Stubbs, Simon K. Warfield, Alexander L. Cohen
{"title":"Coordinate Network Mapping of Focal Brain Volume Differences in ADHD Reveals Common Patterns That Lack Specificity: A Systematic Review","authors":"Juliana Wall,&nbsp;Gillian N. Miller,&nbsp;Joseph J. Taylor,&nbsp;Jacob L. Stubbs,&nbsp;Simon K. Warfield,&nbsp;Alexander L. Cohen","doi":"10.1002/cns3.20108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with decreased regional brain volume, yet no consistent localization has emerged across studies. This discrepancy has been attributed to ADHD's diagnostic heterogeneity; however, one alternative is that ADHD is associated with alterations of brain networks, not individual regions. To test this hypothesis, we compared a traditional anatomic likelihood estimate (ALE) with a “coordinate network mapping” (CNM) approach using data from 38 studies comparing regional brain volumes in ADHD versus healthy controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed an ALE analysis, determining above-chance convergence between experiments. Next, we calculated the overlap with the putamen and default mode network, defined a priori. We then applied CNM, generating connectivity maps for each study and statistically comparing these maps to identify common areas of connectivity across studies. Finally, we compared the network map of ADHD with several control groups of neuropsychiatric disorders and with randomly generated coordinates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ALE identified no significant spatial convergence between experiments. We also found only limited spatial overlap with the default mode network and weak functional connectivity with the putamen. Conversely, CNM revealed that the heterogenous coordinates fell within a consistent brain network characterized by connectivity with the reward and cingulo-opercular “action mode” networks. However, we could not differentiate this network from the CNM-derived networks in control groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Although this network is biologically plausible and consistent with ADHD symptoms, the findings suggest that this network is not specific to ADHD and may reflect large-scale brain networks. Although this meta-analysis adds to the literature on the neurobiology of ADHD, the nonspecific findings convey the importance of studying ADHD at the symptom level.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72232,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","volume":"3 2","pages":"91-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.20108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.20108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with decreased regional brain volume, yet no consistent localization has emerged across studies. This discrepancy has been attributed to ADHD's diagnostic heterogeneity; however, one alternative is that ADHD is associated with alterations of brain networks, not individual regions. To test this hypothesis, we compared a traditional anatomic likelihood estimate (ALE) with a “coordinate network mapping” (CNM) approach using data from 38 studies comparing regional brain volumes in ADHD versus healthy controls.

Methods

We performed an ALE analysis, determining above-chance convergence between experiments. Next, we calculated the overlap with the putamen and default mode network, defined a priori. We then applied CNM, generating connectivity maps for each study and statistically comparing these maps to identify common areas of connectivity across studies. Finally, we compared the network map of ADHD with several control groups of neuropsychiatric disorders and with randomly generated coordinates.

Results

ALE identified no significant spatial convergence between experiments. We also found only limited spatial overlap with the default mode network and weak functional connectivity with the putamen. Conversely, CNM revealed that the heterogenous coordinates fell within a consistent brain network characterized by connectivity with the reward and cingulo-opercular “action mode” networks. However, we could not differentiate this network from the CNM-derived networks in control groups.

Interpretation

Although this network is biologically plausible and consistent with ADHD symptoms, the findings suggest that this network is not specific to ADHD and may reflect large-scale brain networks. Although this meta-analysis adds to the literature on the neurobiology of ADHD, the nonspecific findings convey the importance of studying ADHD at the symptom level.

Abstract Image

ADHD局灶脑容量差异的坐标网络映射揭示了缺乏特异性的共同模式:一项系统综述
目的注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)与局部脑容量减少有关,但在所有研究中没有一致的定位。这种差异归因于ADHD的诊断异质性;然而,另一种说法是ADHD与大脑网络的改变有关,而不是与单个区域有关。为了验证这一假设,我们比较了传统的解剖似然估计(ALE)和“坐标网络映射”(CNM)方法,使用了38项研究的数据,比较了ADHD与健康对照组的区域脑容量。方法进行ALE分析,确定实验之间的概率收敛性。接下来,我们计算了壳核和默认模式网络的重叠,这是先验定义的。然后,我们应用CNM,为每项研究生成连接图,并对这些图进行统计比较,以确定研究之间的公共连接区域。最后,我们将ADHD的网络图与几个神经精神疾病控制组和随机生成的坐标进行比较。结果ALE发现实验间没有明显的空间收敛性。我们还发现与默认模式网络只有有限的空间重叠,与壳核的功能连通性较弱。相反,CNM揭示了异质坐标属于一致的大脑网络,其特征是与奖励和扣谷-眼“动作模式”网络相连。然而,我们无法将该网络与对照组中cnm衍生的网络区分开来。尽管这一网络在生物学上是合理的,并且与ADHD症状一致,但研究结果表明,这一网络并非ADHD所特有,可能反映了大规模的大脑网络。虽然这项荟萃分析增加了ADHD神经生物学的文献,但非特异性的发现传达了在症状水平上研究ADHD的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信