HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS, TREATMENT PATTERNS, AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER CAR-T THERAPY IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
A. Rivas-Delgado, H. S. Raman, M. Kabat, N. Glaubach, M. Corona, E. Luttwak, L. Falchi, J. Lue, M. Scordo, A. D. Zelenetz, M. Perales, G. L. Shah, J. H. Park, S. Ringelstein-Harlev, O. Beyar-Katz, L. A. Leslie, A. Ip, P. Armand, C. A. Jacobson, M. L. Palomba, R. Shouval, R. W. Merryman, G. Salles
{"title":"HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS, TREATMENT PATTERNS, AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER CAR-T THERAPY IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA","authors":"A. Rivas-Delgado,&nbsp;H. S. Raman,&nbsp;M. Kabat,&nbsp;N. Glaubach,&nbsp;M. Corona,&nbsp;E. Luttwak,&nbsp;L. Falchi,&nbsp;J. Lue,&nbsp;M. Scordo,&nbsp;A. D. Zelenetz,&nbsp;M. Perales,&nbsp;G. L. Shah,&nbsp;J. H. Park,&nbsp;S. Ringelstein-Harlev,&nbsp;O. Beyar-Katz,&nbsp;L. A. Leslie,&nbsp;A. Ip,&nbsp;P. Armand,&nbsp;C. A. Jacobson,&nbsp;M. L. Palomba,&nbsp;R. Shouval,&nbsp;R. W. Merryman,&nbsp;G. Salles","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>H. S. Raman equally contributing author.</p><p><b>Introduction:</b> CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has demonstrated outstanding therapeutic activity in patients (pts) with refractory/relapsed (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). However, data regarding histological features, treatment patterns, and outcomes of pts with disease progression (POD) following CD19 CAR-T therapy for R/R are poorly understood.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Characteristics of 101 pts receiving CAR-T for FL were collected across 4 international centers. Pts with FL grade 3B or any prior history of histological transformation were excluded.</p><p><b>Results:</b> We identified 25 pts (24.8%) who experienced POD after CAR-T. Median age at infusion was 62 years (range 34–79). Pre CAR-T FL grade was 1–2 in 76% of the pts, grade 3A in 12%, and unavailable in 12%. Median prior therapy lines were 3 (range 2–7). Administered products were axicabtagene ciloleucel (84%), tisagenlecleucel (12%), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (4%), predominantly as SOC (96%). High-risk features before CAR-T were common: 40% had experienced POD24, 68% were refractory to their last therapy, including 32% with primary refractory disease. Among pts with post-CAR-T POD, the best post-infusion response was CR in 56%, PR in 20%, and stable or progressive disease in 24%. The median time from CAR-T infusion to POD was 8.9 months (IQR 3–15).</p><p>Following POD, 20 pts received systemic therapy (median 1 line, range 1–7), 3 remain on active surveillance, 1 received palliative care, and 1 was lost to follow-up. The ORR after initial post-POD therapy was 72% among evaluable pts. Administered therapies included CD3×CD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) (<i>n</i> = 10; 8 evaluable, ORR 88%, CR 63%), chemoimmunotherapy (<i>n</i> = 6, ORR 83%, CR 50%), tafasitamab-based combinations (lenalidomide, <i>n</i> = 1; tazemetostat, <i>n</i> = 1; no response), lenalidomide + obinutuzumab (<i>n</i> = 1; no response), and investigational agent (<i>n</i> = 1; ORR 100%). Three pts underwent allogeneic SCT as consolidation and are still in remission.</p><p>In 18 pts with post-CAR-T POD histologic documentation, 3 had transformed FL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 1 had FL grade 3B, and 14 had relapsed FL grade 1–3A. CD19-negative disease was found in 1 pt, while 5 (28%) had CD20-negative disease (3 pre-CAR-T exposed to CD3xCD20 BsAb).</p><p>Median follow-up for the entire cohort and from POD was 24 and 16 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival post CAR-T POD was 19 months (95% CI: 10–28) with an estimated 1-year PFS of 68% (95% CI: 50–91). During follow-up, 5 pts (18%) died, all due to disease progression. Median overall survival from POD was not reached, with an estimated 1-y OS of 86% (95% CI: 73–100) (Figure).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort of FL pts with POD post-CAR-T. BsAbs showed promise in this setting, but longer follow-up is needed for durability assessment. The mechanisms associated with risks of POD post-CAR-T and histological transformation warrant further study.</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>L. Falchi</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Roche, Genentech, Genmab, AbbVie, Sanofi, Evolveimmune, Astrazeneca, Merck, ADC therapeutics, Seagen, Ipsen, Johnson &amp; Johnson</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Roche, Genmab, AbbVie, Kite</p><p><b>Educational</b> <b>grants:</b> Genmab, AbbVie, Roche, Kite</p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Research funding: Roche, Genentech, Genmab, AbbVie, Innate Pharma, Beigene AstraZeneca</p><p><b>C. A. Jacobson</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, ADC Therapeutics, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Appia Bio, Aleta, Umoja, Kyverna, Miltenyi, Caribou, Galapagos, Sana, Synthekine, GenmAb, Genentech, Autolus</p><p><b>M. L. Palomba</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> Bristo Meyer Squibb, Novartis, Synthekine, Cellectar</p><p><b>R. W. Merryman</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> DG Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, KITE, Abbvie, Ipsen</p><p><b>Honoraria:</b> Abbvie, Genmab</p><p><b>G. Salles</b></p><p><b>Consultant or advisory role:</b> AbbVie, ATB Therapeutics, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Debiopharm, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Loxo/Lilly, Merck, Molecular Partners</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_250","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70094_250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

H. S. Raman equally contributing author.

Introduction: CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has demonstrated outstanding therapeutic activity in patients (pts) with refractory/relapsed (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). However, data regarding histological features, treatment patterns, and outcomes of pts with disease progression (POD) following CD19 CAR-T therapy for R/R are poorly understood.

Methods: Characteristics of 101 pts receiving CAR-T for FL were collected across 4 international centers. Pts with FL grade 3B or any prior history of histological transformation were excluded.

Results: We identified 25 pts (24.8%) who experienced POD after CAR-T. Median age at infusion was 62 years (range 34–79). Pre CAR-T FL grade was 1–2 in 76% of the pts, grade 3A in 12%, and unavailable in 12%. Median prior therapy lines were 3 (range 2–7). Administered products were axicabtagene ciloleucel (84%), tisagenlecleucel (12%), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (4%), predominantly as SOC (96%). High-risk features before CAR-T were common: 40% had experienced POD24, 68% were refractory to their last therapy, including 32% with primary refractory disease. Among pts with post-CAR-T POD, the best post-infusion response was CR in 56%, PR in 20%, and stable or progressive disease in 24%. The median time from CAR-T infusion to POD was 8.9 months (IQR 3–15).

Following POD, 20 pts received systemic therapy (median 1 line, range 1–7), 3 remain on active surveillance, 1 received palliative care, and 1 was lost to follow-up. The ORR after initial post-POD therapy was 72% among evaluable pts. Administered therapies included CD3×CD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) (n = 10; 8 evaluable, ORR 88%, CR 63%), chemoimmunotherapy (n = 6, ORR 83%, CR 50%), tafasitamab-based combinations (lenalidomide, n = 1; tazemetostat, n = 1; no response), lenalidomide + obinutuzumab (n = 1; no response), and investigational agent (n = 1; ORR 100%). Three pts underwent allogeneic SCT as consolidation and are still in remission.

In 18 pts with post-CAR-T POD histologic documentation, 3 had transformed FL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 1 had FL grade 3B, and 14 had relapsed FL grade 1–3A. CD19-negative disease was found in 1 pt, while 5 (28%) had CD20-negative disease (3 pre-CAR-T exposed to CD3xCD20 BsAb).

Median follow-up for the entire cohort and from POD was 24 and 16 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival post CAR-T POD was 19 months (95% CI: 10–28) with an estimated 1-year PFS of 68% (95% CI: 50–91). During follow-up, 5 pts (18%) died, all due to disease progression. Median overall survival from POD was not reached, with an estimated 1-y OS of 86% (95% CI: 73–100) (Figure).

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort of FL pts with POD post-CAR-T. BsAbs showed promise in this setting, but longer follow-up is needed for durability assessment. The mechanisms associated with risks of POD post-CAR-T and histological transformation warrant further study.

Keywords: indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Potential sources of conflict of interest:

L. Falchi

Consultant or advisory role: Roche, Genentech, Genmab, AbbVie, Sanofi, Evolveimmune, Astrazeneca, Merck, ADC therapeutics, Seagen, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson

Honoraria: Roche, Genmab, AbbVie, Kite

Educational grants: Genmab, AbbVie, Roche, Kite

Other remuneration: Research funding: Roche, Genentech, Genmab, AbbVie, Innate Pharma, Beigene AstraZeneca

C. A. Jacobson

Consultant or advisory role: Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, ADC Therapeutics, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Appia Bio, Aleta, Umoja, Kyverna, Miltenyi, Caribou, Galapagos, Sana, Synthekine, GenmAb, Genentech, Autolus

M. L. Palomba

Consultant or advisory role: Bristo Meyer Squibb, Novartis, Synthekine, Cellectar

R. W. Merryman

Consultant or advisory role: DG Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, KITE, Abbvie, Ipsen

Honoraria: Abbvie, Genmab

G. Salles

Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, ATB Therapeutics, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Debiopharm, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Loxo/Lilly, Merck, Molecular Partners

Abstract Image

复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤car-t治疗后疾病进展的组织学特征、治疗模式和结果
h·s·拉曼,同样有贡献。cd19靶向CAR- t细胞疗法(CAR- t)在难治性/复发性(R/R)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者(pts)中显示出出色的治疗活性。然而,关于CD19 CAR-T治疗R/R后疾病进展(POD)患者的组织学特征、治疗模式和结局的数据知之甚少。方法:收集来自4个国际中心的101例接受CAR-T治疗的FL患者的特征。FL分级为3B或有任何组织学改变史的患者均被排除在外。结果:我们确定了25例(24.8%)CAR-T后出现POD。输液时的中位年龄为62岁(范围34-79岁)。CAR-T前FL分级为1-2的患者占76%,3A级的患者占12%,无法获得的患者占12%。既往治疗线中位数为3条(范围2-7)。给药产品为艾卡布tagene千烯酸(84%)、tisagenlecleucel(12%)和异卡布tagene千烯酸(4%),主要为SOC(96%)。CAR-T治疗前的高危特征很常见:40%曾经历过POD24, 68%对最后一次治疗难治性,其中32%为原发性难治性疾病。在car - t后POD患者中,输注后最佳反应是CR (56%), PR(20%),疾病稳定或进展(24%)。CAR-T输注至POD的中位时间为8.9个月(IQR 3-15)。POD后,20名患者接受了全身治疗(中位1线,范围1 - 7),3名患者仍在积极监测,1名患者接受了姑息治疗,1名患者失去了随访。在可评估的患者中,初始pod治疗后的ORR为72%。给予的治疗包括CD3×CD20双特异性抗体(BsAbs) (n = 10;8例可评估,ORR 88%, CR 63%),化学免疫治疗(n = 6, ORR 83%, CR 50%),他法西他单抗联合(来那度胺,n = 1;Tazemetostat, n = 1;来那度胺+ obinutuzumab (n = 1;无应答)和研究药物(n = 1;或者100%)。3名患者接受了同种异体SCT作为巩固,目前仍处于缓解期。在有car - t后POD组织学记录的18例患者中,3例FL转化为弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤,1例FL为3B级,14例FL复发为1 - 3a级。cd19阴性疾病1例,cd20阴性疾病5例(28%)(3例car - t前暴露于CD3xCD20 BsAb)。整个队列和POD的中位随访时间分别为24个月和16个月。CAR-T POD后的中位无进展生存期为19个月(95% CI: 10-28),估计1年PFS为68% (95% CI: 50-91)。随访期间,5例(18%)患者死亡,均因疾病进展。POD的中位总生存期未达到,估计1年OS为86% (95% CI: 73-100)(图)。结论:据我们所知,这代表了car - t后发生POD的最大的FL队列。bsab在这种情况下表现出了希望,但耐久性评估需要更长的随访时间。car - t和组织学转化后POD风险的相关机制有待进一步研究。关键词:惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤潜在利益冲突来源:L。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏、Genentech、Genmab、艾伯维、赛诺菲、Evolveimmune、阿斯利康、默克、ADC therapeutics、Seagen、Ipsen、Johnson &;强生公司:罗氏、Genmab、艾伯维、kite教育资助:Genmab、艾伯维、罗氏、kite其他报酬:研究资助:罗氏、基因泰克、Genmab、艾伯维、Innate Pharma、百辰阿斯利康。顾问或顾问角色:Kite/Gilead、BMS、Novartis、ADC Therapeutics、Abbvie、AstraZeneca、Janssen、Appia Bio、Aleta、Umoja、Kyverna、Miltenyi、Caribou、Galapagos、Sana、Synthekine、GenmAb、Genentech、AutolusM。顾问或顾问角色:百时美施贵宝,诺华,Synthekine, CellectarR。顾问或顾问角色:DG Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, KITE, Abbvie, IpsenHonoraria: Abbvie, GenmabG。顾问或顾问角色:AbbVie, ATB Therapeutics, BeiGene, BMS/Celgene, Debiopharm, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Loxo/Lilly,默克,Molecular Partners
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信