Toward a Standardized Metaverse Definition: Empirical Evidence From the ITU Metaverse Focus Group

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Elli Kontogianni;Leonidas Anthopoulos
{"title":"Toward a Standardized Metaverse Definition: Empirical Evidence From the ITU Metaverse Focus Group","authors":"Elli Kontogianni;Leonidas Anthopoulos","doi":"10.1109/EMR.2024.3416331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the term metaverse was first coined in 1992, discussions surrounding its definition began to emerge in the literature only around 2010 and have not been standardized yet. Recent literature provides numerous definitions of the term, which appear to lack conceptual clarity and cause an ambiguous understanding of the metaverse and its accompanying terminology, strengthening the importance of a commonly agreed definition. This article follows a multimethod research methodology consisting of a bibliometric analysis, a literature review, and an international focus group dedicated to the standardization of the metaverse. The bibliometric analysis that was conducted using the keywords “metaverse” and “definition” to the scientific repositories ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus, revealed, among others, the most cited articles. Definitions extracted from the top ten cited articles were compiled, and their associated keywords and their weaknesses were identified. As these findings needed to be confirmed, they were circulated with the focus group experts, leading to an exchange of various insights and information concerning the definition of the metaverse. The outcomes of this study are highly interesting since they delineate the pivotal terms of the metaverse, culminating in the establishment of a universally accepted definition.","PeriodicalId":35585,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","volume":"53 3","pages":"110-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10565808/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the term metaverse was first coined in 1992, discussions surrounding its definition began to emerge in the literature only around 2010 and have not been standardized yet. Recent literature provides numerous definitions of the term, which appear to lack conceptual clarity and cause an ambiguous understanding of the metaverse and its accompanying terminology, strengthening the importance of a commonly agreed definition. This article follows a multimethod research methodology consisting of a bibliometric analysis, a literature review, and an international focus group dedicated to the standardization of the metaverse. The bibliometric analysis that was conducted using the keywords “metaverse” and “definition” to the scientific repositories ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus, revealed, among others, the most cited articles. Definitions extracted from the top ten cited articles were compiled, and their associated keywords and their weaknesses were identified. As these findings needed to be confirmed, they were circulated with the focus group experts, leading to an exchange of various insights and information concerning the definition of the metaverse. The outcomes of this study are highly interesting since they delineate the pivotal terms of the metaverse, culminating in the establishment of a universally accepted definition.
迈向标准化的元宇宙定义:来自国际电联元宇宙焦点组的经验证据
尽管“元宇宙”一词最早出现于1992年,但围绕其定义的讨论直到2010年左右才开始出现在文献中,并且尚未标准化。最近的文献提供了该术语的许多定义,这些定义似乎缺乏概念清晰度,并导致对元宇宙及其伴随术语的模糊理解,从而加强了普遍同意定义的重要性。本文采用多方法研究方法,包括文献计量学分析、文献综述和致力于元宇宙标准化的国际焦点小组。使用关键词“metaverse”和“definition”对科学数据库ScienceDirect、Web of Science和Scopus进行了文献计量分析,揭示了被引用最多的文章。从被引次数最多的10篇文章中提取的定义进行了编译,并确定了它们的相关关键词及其弱点。由于这些发现需要得到证实,因此将它们与焦点小组专家一起分发,从而交换了有关元宇宙定义的各种见解和信息。这项研究的结果非常有趣,因为它们描绘了元宇宙的关键术语,最终建立了一个普遍接受的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Engineering Management Review
IEEE Engineering Management Review Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Reprints articles from other publications of significant interest to members. The papers are aimed at those engaged in managing research, development, or engineering activities. Reprints make it possible for the readers to receive the best of today"s literature without having to subscribe to and read other periodicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信