A mixed systematic review of interventions to support the well-being of refugee youth in school and community settings

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Amira Noyes , Nataliya Kubishyn , Jason Brown
{"title":"A mixed systematic review of interventions to support the well-being of refugee youth in school and community settings","authors":"Amira Noyes ,&nbsp;Nataliya Kubishyn ,&nbsp;Jason Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To systematically review the evidence for school and community based interventions aimed at improving the well-being of refugee children and youth.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Mixed studies systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021253571).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Nine electronic databases were searched for articles published in English that investigated the effects of psychological interventions aimed at improving distress, mental health symptoms, or increase psychological functioning and were provided in school or community settings. The search was limited to January 1, 2013 to November 3, 2023. A grey literature search was completed using the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Quality appraisal and risk of bias was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-four studies were deemed eligible for inclusion representing data from 9,400 children and youth and were narratively reviewed and synthesized. CBT interventions were the most studied intervention and reported the most positive results overall, including improvements to trauma, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Results for psychosocial, creative expressive therapies, and trauma systems therapy interventions were mixed. Thematic synthesis of qualitative data reflected youths’ experiences including feeling increased connection to others, decreased negative feelings, and increased well-being as benefits of the interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Refugee children and youth benefit from evidence-based psychological interventions in school and community sites. CBT interventions were effective in both school and community settings. Other therapeutic modalities such as creative expressive therapies, psychosocial interventions, and trauma systems therapy reported less consistent results and would benefit from further study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 108371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To systematically review the evidence for school and community based interventions aimed at improving the well-being of refugee children and youth.

Design

Mixed studies systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021253571).

Method

Nine electronic databases were searched for articles published in English that investigated the effects of psychological interventions aimed at improving distress, mental health symptoms, or increase psychological functioning and were provided in school or community settings. The search was limited to January 1, 2013 to November 3, 2023. A grey literature search was completed using the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Quality appraisal and risk of bias was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results

Thirty-four studies were deemed eligible for inclusion representing data from 9,400 children and youth and were narratively reviewed and synthesized. CBT interventions were the most studied intervention and reported the most positive results overall, including improvements to trauma, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Results for psychosocial, creative expressive therapies, and trauma systems therapy interventions were mixed. Thematic synthesis of qualitative data reflected youths’ experiences including feeling increased connection to others, decreased negative feelings, and increased well-being as benefits of the interventions.

Conclusions

Refugee children and youth benefit from evidence-based psychological interventions in school and community sites. CBT interventions were effective in both school and community settings. Other therapeutic modalities such as creative expressive therapies, psychosocial interventions, and trauma systems therapy reported less consistent results and would benefit from further study.
对在学校和社区环境中支持难民青年福祉的干预措施进行的混合系统审查
目的系统地审查旨在改善难民儿童和青少年福祉的学校和社区干预措施的证据。设计混合研究系统评价(PROSPERO CRD42021253571)。方法检索了9个电子数据库,检索了在学校或社区环境中发表的调查心理干预效果的英文论文,这些干预旨在改善痛苦、心理健康症状或增加心理功能。搜索范围限于2013年1月1日至2023年11月3日。使用世卫组织国际临床试验登记处完成了灰色文献检索。使用混合方法评估工具进行质量评估和偏倚风险评估。结果34项研究被认为符合纳入条件,代表了9400名儿童和青少年的数据,并进行了叙述性的回顾和综合。CBT干预是研究最多的干预措施,总体上报告了最积极的结果,包括对创伤、抑郁和焦虑症状的改善。心理社会、创造性表达疗法和创伤系统治疗干预的结果好坏参半。定性数据的专题综合反映了青少年的经历,包括感觉与他人的联系增加,负面情绪减少,以及作为干预措施的好处的幸福感增加。结论难民儿童和青少年从学校和社区的循证心理干预中受益。CBT干预在学校和社区都是有效的。其他治疗方式,如创造性表达疗法、社会心理干预和创伤系统治疗报告的结果不太一致,将受益于进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信