Jagabandhu Mishra , Manasi Chhibber , Hye-jin Shim , Tomi H. Kinnunen
{"title":"Towards explainable spoofed speech attribution and detection: A probabilistic approach for characterizing speech synthesizer components","authors":"Jagabandhu Mishra , Manasi Chhibber , Hye-jin Shim , Tomi H. Kinnunen","doi":"10.1016/j.csl.2025.101840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We propose an explainable probabilistic framework for characterizing spoofed speech by decomposing it into probabilistic attribute embeddings. Unlike raw high-dimensional countermeasure embeddings, which lack interpretability, the proposed probabilistic attribute embeddings aim to detect specific speech synthesizer components, represented through high-level attributes and their corresponding values. We use these probabilistic embeddings with four classifier back-ends to address two downstream tasks: spoofing detection and spoofing attack attribution. The former is the well-known bonafide-spoof detection task, whereas the latter seeks to identify the source method (generator) of a spoofed utterance. We additionally use Shapley values, a widely used technique in machine learning, to quantify the relative contribution of each attribute value to the decision-making process in each task. Results on the ASVspoof2019 dataset demonstrate the substantial role of waveform generator, conversion model outputs, and inputs in spoofing detection; and inputs, speaker, and duration modeling in spoofing attack attribution. In the detection task, the probabilistic attribute embeddings achieve 99.7% balanced accuracy and 0.22% equal error rate (EER), closely matching the performance of raw embeddings (99.9% balanced accuracy and 0.22% EER). Similarly, in the attribution task, our embeddings achieve 90.23% balanced accuracy and 2.07% EER, compared to 90.16% and 2.11% with raw embeddings. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework is both inherently explainable by design and capable of achieving performance comparable to raw CM embeddings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50638,"journal":{"name":"Computer Speech and Language","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 101840"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Speech and Language","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230825000658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We propose an explainable probabilistic framework for characterizing spoofed speech by decomposing it into probabilistic attribute embeddings. Unlike raw high-dimensional countermeasure embeddings, which lack interpretability, the proposed probabilistic attribute embeddings aim to detect specific speech synthesizer components, represented through high-level attributes and their corresponding values. We use these probabilistic embeddings with four classifier back-ends to address two downstream tasks: spoofing detection and spoofing attack attribution. The former is the well-known bonafide-spoof detection task, whereas the latter seeks to identify the source method (generator) of a spoofed utterance. We additionally use Shapley values, a widely used technique in machine learning, to quantify the relative contribution of each attribute value to the decision-making process in each task. Results on the ASVspoof2019 dataset demonstrate the substantial role of waveform generator, conversion model outputs, and inputs in spoofing detection; and inputs, speaker, and duration modeling in spoofing attack attribution. In the detection task, the probabilistic attribute embeddings achieve 99.7% balanced accuracy and 0.22% equal error rate (EER), closely matching the performance of raw embeddings (99.9% balanced accuracy and 0.22% EER). Similarly, in the attribution task, our embeddings achieve 90.23% balanced accuracy and 2.07% EER, compared to 90.16% and 2.11% with raw embeddings. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework is both inherently explainable by design and capable of achieving performance comparable to raw CM embeddings.
期刊介绍:
Computer Speech & Language publishes reports of original research related to the recognition, understanding, production, coding and mining of speech and language.
The speech and language sciences have a long history, but it is only relatively recently that large-scale implementation of and experimentation with complex models of speech and language processing has become feasible. Such research is often carried out somewhat separately by practitioners of artificial intelligence, computer science, electronic engineering, information retrieval, linguistics, phonetics, or psychology.