Effect of threshold parameters on infrared segmentation methods for porosity detection in electron beam powder bed fusion

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Brian Johnstone , Jaime Berez , Caroline Massey , Elliott Jost , Christopher Saldana , Katherine Fu
{"title":"Effect of threshold parameters on infrared segmentation methods for porosity detection in electron beam powder bed fusion","authors":"Brian Johnstone ,&nbsp;Jaime Berez ,&nbsp;Caroline Massey ,&nbsp;Elliott Jost ,&nbsp;Christopher Saldana ,&nbsp;Katherine Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.06.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In-situ process monitoring has seen significant interest in additive manufacturing to address qualification and certification goals. This is especially prevalent in metal powder bed fusion processes such as electron beam powder bed fusion (PBF-EB), with layer-wise infrared imaging being commonly used to detect defects. This work compares two different segmentation methods (static thresholding and statistical thresholding) used for detecting porosity from in-situ infrared imaging data for PBF-EB. Samples were manufactured at a variety of focus offset values to induce porosity. Then, the segmented infrared images were compared to ex-situ X-ray computed tomography scans, which served as a ground-truth reference for objective evaluation. Through this analysis framework, the influential parameters, static threshold and N-value (number of standard deviations above the mean pixel value), respectively, for both image segmentation methods were analyzed and compared for their effects on porosity detection. With optimal parameter settings, the two methods had similar porosity detection performance, but the statistical method performed better under a larger variety of parameter settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","volume":"149 ","pages":"Pages 1066-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612525006851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-situ process monitoring has seen significant interest in additive manufacturing to address qualification and certification goals. This is especially prevalent in metal powder bed fusion processes such as electron beam powder bed fusion (PBF-EB), with layer-wise infrared imaging being commonly used to detect defects. This work compares two different segmentation methods (static thresholding and statistical thresholding) used for detecting porosity from in-situ infrared imaging data for PBF-EB. Samples were manufactured at a variety of focus offset values to induce porosity. Then, the segmented infrared images were compared to ex-situ X-ray computed tomography scans, which served as a ground-truth reference for objective evaluation. Through this analysis framework, the influential parameters, static threshold and N-value (number of standard deviations above the mean pixel value), respectively, for both image segmentation methods were analyzed and compared for their effects on porosity detection. With optimal parameter settings, the two methods had similar porosity detection performance, but the statistical method performed better under a larger variety of parameter settings.
阈值参数对电子束粉末床熔合孔隙率红外分割方法的影响
现场过程监控已经引起了人们对增材制造的极大兴趣,以解决资格和认证目标。这在金属粉末床熔合过程中尤其普遍,例如电子束粉末床熔合(PBF-EB),分层红外成像通常用于检测缺陷。这项工作比较了两种不同的分割方法(静态阈值法和统计阈值法),用于从PBF-EB的原位红外成像数据中检测孔隙度。样品在不同的焦点偏移值下制造,以诱导孔隙率。然后,将分割后的红外图像与非原位x射线计算机断层扫描图像进行比较,作为客观评价的真实参考。通过该分析框架,分析比较了两种图像分割方法的影响参数静态阈值和n值(高于平均像素值的标准差数)对孔隙度检测的影响。在最佳参数设置下,两种方法的孔隙度检测性能相近,但统计方法在更大参数设置下的性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Journal of Manufacturing Processes ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
11.30%
发文量
833
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is to exchange current and future directions of manufacturing processes research, development and implementation, and to publish archival scholarly literature with a view to advancing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and encouraging innovation for developing new and efficient processes. The journal will also publish from other research communities for rapid communication of innovative new concepts. Special-topic issues on emerging technologies and invited papers will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信