Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD , Rebecca Priebe NP , Jane Simanovski PhD, NP , Lisa L. Allenspach MD , Lisa Stagner DO , Lisa K. Waynick PA , Yichu Wang BS , Mei Lu BS , Shraddha Desai MD , Daniel Kapadia MD , Avi Cohen MD
{"title":"Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction","authors":"Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca Priebe NP ,&nbsp;Jane Simanovski PhD, NP ,&nbsp;Lisa L. Allenspach MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Stagner DO ,&nbsp;Lisa K. Waynick PA ,&nbsp;Yichu Wang BS ,&nbsp;Mei Lu BS ,&nbsp;Shraddha Desai MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Kapadia MD ,&nbsp;Avi Cohen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, <em>P</em> = .001), and lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, <em>P</em> = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV<sub>1</sub> increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV<sub>1</sub> at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).

Research Question

What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?

Study Design and Methods

This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV1, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.

Results

Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, P < .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, P = .001), and lower FEV1 (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, P = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV1 increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV1 at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV1 % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).

Interpretation

Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.
支气管镜下肺减容
许多支气管镜下肺减容(BLVR)研究排除了符合肺移植(LT)清单标准的患者。研究问题:与不符合LT清单标准的患者相比,病情较重的肺气肿患者进行BLVR的结果是什么?研究设计和方法这是一项真实世界的回顾性研究(2018年6月至2022年12月),评估BLVR对lt考虑的严重肺气肿患者的影响。在基线和BLVR后45天和6个月测量FEV1、FVC、一氧化碳弥散能力、症状和6分钟步行距离(6- mwd)。结果76例充分评估的患者(中位年龄62岁;60%为女性),42例接受了BLVR(30例病情较重的患者符合LT列表标准)。基线时,符合清单标准的患者基线6-MWD较短(234.72±68.86,P <;.001),较高的BODE指数评分(6.79±1.11,P = .001),较低的FEV1评分(617.5±139.2 mL, P = .005)。所有接受BLVR治疗的患者BODE指数和Borg呼吸困难分别下降了- 0.5到- 2分。预测一氧化碳扩散量增加4.5%,FEV1增加115 mL, FVC增加450 mL, 6-MWD增加20米。在病情较重的组,与基线相比,BLVR后45天FEV1增加了180.8±231 mL (FEV1 %预测为5.84±5.66);在有可用数据的患者中,62%的患者(30人中有18人)在6个月后出现持续的效果。平均住院时间为3.27±3.07天。6例患者(每组3例)因并发症切除支气管内瓣膜。气胸发生率为24% (10 / 42;每组5人)。解释:无论疾病严重程度如何,BLVR术后肺功能均有改善。对于一些患者来说,BLVR可能是替代肝移植的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信