Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD , Rebecca Priebe NP , Jane Simanovski PhD, NP , Lisa L. Allenspach MD , Lisa Stagner DO , Lisa K. Waynick PA , Yichu Wang BS , Mei Lu BS , Shraddha Desai MD , Daniel Kapadia MD , Avi Cohen MD
{"title":"Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction","authors":"Domingo J. Franco-Palacios MD , Rebecca Priebe NP , Jane Simanovski PhD, NP , Lisa L. Allenspach MD , Lisa Stagner DO , Lisa K. Waynick PA , Yichu Wang BS , Mei Lu BS , Shraddha Desai MD , Daniel Kapadia MD , Avi Cohen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, <em>P</em> < .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, <em>P</em> = .001), and lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, <em>P</em> = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV<sub>1</sub> increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV<sub>1</sub> at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV<sub>1</sub> % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Many bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) studies have excluded patients meeting the listing criteria for lung transplantation (LT).
Research Question
What are the outcomes of BLVR in a sicker group of patients with emphysema compared with patients not meeting the criteria for LT listing?
Study Design and Methods
This was a real-world retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) assessing the effect of BLVR in patients with severe emphysema considered for LT. FEV1, FVC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, symptoms, and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were measured at baseline and 45 days and 6 months after BLVR.
Results
Of 76 fully evaluated patients (median age, 62 years; 60% female), 42 underwent BLVR (30 sicker patients met the criteria for LT listing). At baseline, patients that met the criteria for listing had shorter baseline 6-MWD (234.72 ± 68.86, P < .001), higher BODE Index score (6.79 ± 1.11, P = .001), and lower FEV1 (617.5 ± 139.2 mL, P = .005). All patients treated with BLVR experienced a decrease in BODE Index and Borg dyspnea by scores −0.5 to −2 points, respectively. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide % predicted increased by 4.5%, FEV1 increased by 115 mL, FVC increased by 450 mL, and 6-MWD increased by 20 meters. In the sicker group, FEV1 at 45 days after BLVR increased by 180.8 ± 231 mL (FEV1 % predicted 5.84 ± 5.66) compared with baseline; a persistent effect was seen at 6 months in 62% of patients with available data (18 of 30). Median hospital length of stay was 3.27 ± 3.07 days. Endobronchial valves were removed in 6 patients (3 in each group) due to complications. The pneumothorax rate was 24% (10 of 42; 5 in each group).
Interpretation
Improvement in lung function after BLVR was observed regardless of disease severity. BLVR might represent an alternative to LT for some patients.