A Novel Cleansing Solution for High-Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Noemi Gualandi , Giulia Gibiino , Giuliano Francesco Bonura , Matteo Secco , Paola Soriani , Alessandro Cucchetti , Cecilia Binda , Valentina Zadro , Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia , Paolo Biancheri , Mauro Manno , Carlo Fabbri
{"title":"A Novel Cleansing Solution for High-Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Noemi Gualandi ,&nbsp;Giulia Gibiino ,&nbsp;Giuliano Francesco Bonura ,&nbsp;Matteo Secco ,&nbsp;Paola Soriani ,&nbsp;Alessandro Cucchetti ,&nbsp;Cecilia Binda ,&nbsp;Valentina Zadro ,&nbsp;Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia ,&nbsp;Paolo Biancheri ,&nbsp;Mauro Manno ,&nbsp;Carlo Fabbri","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2025.250928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the gold standard examination for upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease diagnosis; however, intraluminal bubbles and mucus may reduce visibility. Mucolytic and tensioactive agents before EGD improve gastric visualization. We compared the efficacy of a novel cleansing preparation vs fasting on upper GI tract visualization during EGD.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial on consecutive adult outpatients undergoing EGD. Patients were randomized 1:1 to drink 50 mL of simethicone 150 mg, N-acetylcysteine 250 mg, and 10% acetic acid solution (Lumevis, Biofarmatec srl, Palermo, Italy) before the EGD or to fasting. The primary outcome was overall mucosal vision quality score, defined as the sum of 1-10 visual analog scale scores (0 = no visualization; 10 = perfect visualization) for each segment (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) before washing. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rate, patient satisfaction, and EGD duration.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Patients were randomized to cleansing solution (<em>n</em> = 60) or fasting (<em>n</em> = 60). Cleansing preparation administration before EGD was associated with a higher overall mucosal vision quality score compared with fasting only (median visual analog scale score 23 [range, 21-25] vs 19 [range, 16-23], <em>P</em> = 0.001). No adverse events were reported in both groups. Patient satisfaction and EGD duration were similar between the cleansing preparation and fasting only.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Compared with fasting only, the administration of this novel cleansing solution was associated with improved mucosal visualization of the upper GI tract.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 250928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030725000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the gold standard examination for upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease diagnosis; however, intraluminal bubbles and mucus may reduce visibility. Mucolytic and tensioactive agents before EGD improve gastric visualization. We compared the efficacy of a novel cleansing preparation vs fasting on upper GI tract visualization during EGD.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial on consecutive adult outpatients undergoing EGD. Patients were randomized 1:1 to drink 50 mL of simethicone 150 mg, N-acetylcysteine 250 mg, and 10% acetic acid solution (Lumevis, Biofarmatec srl, Palermo, Italy) before the EGD or to fasting. The primary outcome was overall mucosal vision quality score, defined as the sum of 1-10 visual analog scale scores (0 = no visualization; 10 = perfect visualization) for each segment (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) before washing. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rate, patient satisfaction, and EGD duration.

RESULTS

Patients were randomized to cleansing solution (n = 60) or fasting (n = 60). Cleansing preparation administration before EGD was associated with a higher overall mucosal vision quality score compared with fasting only (median visual analog scale score 23 [range, 21-25] vs 19 [range, 16-23], P = 0.001). No adverse events were reported in both groups. Patient satisfaction and EGD duration were similar between the cleansing preparation and fasting only.

CONCLUSION

Compared with fasting only, the administration of this novel cleansing solution was associated with improved mucosal visualization of the upper GI tract.
一种用于高质量上消化道内镜检查的新型清洁溶液:一项多中心随机对照试验
背景与目的食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)是上消化道疾病诊断的金标准检查;然而,腔内气泡和粘液可能会降低能见度。EGD前使用粘液溶解剂和张力活性药物可改善胃显像。我们比较了一种新型清洁制剂与禁食对EGD期间上消化道显像的疗效。方法对连续接受EGD的成人门诊患者进行多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。患者按1:1的比例随机分配,在EGD前或禁食时饮用50 mL的西甲硅氧烷150 mg、n -乙酰半胱氨酸250 mg和10%的醋酸溶液(Lumevis, Biofarmatec srl, Palermo, Italy)。主要终点是粘膜视觉质量总分,定义为1-10个视觉模拟量表评分的总和(0 =无视觉;10 =完美的视觉效果)清洗前对每个节段(食道、胃和十二指肠)进行检查。次要结局包括不良事件发生率、患者满意度和EGD持续时间。结果患者随机分为洗液组(n = 60)和禁食组(n = 60)。与禁食相比,EGD前给予清洁制剂与更高的总体粘膜视觉质量评分相关(视觉模拟量表中位数评分为23[范围,21-25]对19[范围,16-23],P = 0.001)。两组均无不良事件发生。患者满意度和EGD持续时间在清洁制剂和禁食之间相似。结论:与单纯禁食相比,使用这种新型清洁液可改善上消化道粘膜的显像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信