Distinct symptom recoveries based upon highest level of care in patients with sport-related concussion or traumatic brain injury and Glasgow Coma Scale 13–15

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shawn R. Eagle , Bryan Lamb , Daniel Huber , Michael A. McCrea , Sergey Tarima , Terri A. deRoon-Cassini , David O. Okonkwo , Lindsay D. Nelson
{"title":"Distinct symptom recoveries based upon highest level of care in patients with sport-related concussion or traumatic brain injury and Glasgow Coma Scale 13–15","authors":"Shawn R. Eagle ,&nbsp;Bryan Lamb ,&nbsp;Daniel Huber ,&nbsp;Michael A. McCrea ,&nbsp;Sergey Tarima ,&nbsp;Terri A. deRoon-Cassini ,&nbsp;David O. Okonkwo ,&nbsp;Lindsay D. Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are limited data directly comparing recovery across traumatic brain injury subpopulations. We compared symptom recovery profiles between patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13–15 traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the same region in three cohorts: (1) Participants with sport-related concussion (SRC), (2) participants evaluated and discharged from the level 1 trauma center emergency department (ED), and (3) participants who required 1 + night(s) in the inpatient unit (IP). The current analysis aggregates data from two prospective cohort studies at the same institution resulting in a combined dataset of 395 patients with TBI (224 with SRC, 95 discharged from the ED, and 75 admitted [IP]). The primary outcome measure of interest was self-reported TBI symptom duration (in days). Two multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated differences in symptom recovery between groups while controlling for recovery risk factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, acute symptom severity, psychological disorder history, loss of consciousness, and post-traumatic amnesia. The second model included only ED and IP, due to availability of additional predictor variables in these samples (e.g., education, cause of injury, peripheral injury severity). In unadjusted models, hazards of symptom recovery were lower with increasing levels of care (IP vs. ED HR=.40, p &lt; .001; IP vs. SRC HR=.11, p &lt; .001, ED vs. SRC HR=.28, p &lt; .001). Controlling for covariates, longer symptom recovery in the trauma center subsamples versus SRC persisted (IP vs. SRC HR=.26, p = .018, ED vs. SRC HR=.52, p = .021), whereas differences between ED and IP became nonsignificant (HR=.86, p = .782). Acute symptom severity (HR=0.98; p &lt; 0.001–0.010) and psychiatric history (HR=0.27–0.36; p ≤ 0.034) were independent predictors of symptom duration in both models. The results of this study suggest that patients with TBI and GCS 13–15 seen at a level 1 trauma center vary significantly in symptom recovery and severity in comparison to those with SRC, regardless of population differences in age, sex and psychiatric history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 109017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are limited data directly comparing recovery across traumatic brain injury subpopulations. We compared symptom recovery profiles between patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13–15 traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the same region in three cohorts: (1) Participants with sport-related concussion (SRC), (2) participants evaluated and discharged from the level 1 trauma center emergency department (ED), and (3) participants who required 1 + night(s) in the inpatient unit (IP). The current analysis aggregates data from two prospective cohort studies at the same institution resulting in a combined dataset of 395 patients with TBI (224 with SRC, 95 discharged from the ED, and 75 admitted [IP]). The primary outcome measure of interest was self-reported TBI symptom duration (in days). Two multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated differences in symptom recovery between groups while controlling for recovery risk factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, acute symptom severity, psychological disorder history, loss of consciousness, and post-traumatic amnesia. The second model included only ED and IP, due to availability of additional predictor variables in these samples (e.g., education, cause of injury, peripheral injury severity). In unadjusted models, hazards of symptom recovery were lower with increasing levels of care (IP vs. ED HR=.40, p < .001; IP vs. SRC HR=.11, p < .001, ED vs. SRC HR=.28, p < .001). Controlling for covariates, longer symptom recovery in the trauma center subsamples versus SRC persisted (IP vs. SRC HR=.26, p = .018, ED vs. SRC HR=.52, p = .021), whereas differences between ED and IP became nonsignificant (HR=.86, p = .782). Acute symptom severity (HR=0.98; p < 0.001–0.010) and psychiatric history (HR=0.27–0.36; p ≤ 0.034) were independent predictors of symptom duration in both models. The results of this study suggest that patients with TBI and GCS 13–15 seen at a level 1 trauma center vary significantly in symptom recovery and severity in comparison to those with SRC, regardless of population differences in age, sex and psychiatric history.
基于运动相关脑震荡或创伤性脑损伤患者的最高护理水平和格拉斯哥昏迷量表13-15的明显症状恢复
直接比较创伤性脑损伤亚群恢复情况的数据有限。我们比较了来自同一地区的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS) 13-15创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的症状恢复情况,分为三个队列:(1)运动相关脑震荡(SRC)患者,(2)经评估并从一级创伤中心急诊科(ED)出院的患者,以及(3)需要在住院病房(IP)住1个 + 晚上的患者。目前的分析汇总了来自同一机构的两项前瞻性队列研究的数据,得出了395名TBI患者的综合数据集(224名患有SRC, 95名从急诊科出院,75名住院[IP])。主要结局指标是自我报告的TBI症状持续时间(以天为单位)。两个多变量Cox比例风险模型评估了两组之间症状恢复的差异,同时控制了恢复危险因素,包括年龄、性别、种族/民族、急性症状严重程度、心理障碍史、意识丧失和创伤后失忆症。第二个模型仅包括ED和IP,因为这些样本中有其他预测变量(例如教育程度、损伤原因、外周损伤严重程度)。在未调整的模型中,随着护理水平的提高,症状恢复的风险更低(IP vs. ED HR=)。40岁的p & lt; 措施;IP vs. SRC =。11日,p & lt; 。1、ED vs. SRC HR=。28日,p & lt; 措施)。控制协变量,创伤中心亚样本的症状恢复时间较长,而SRC持续(IP vs. SRC HR=)。26日,p = 。018, ED vs. SRC HR=。52, p = .021),而ED和IP之间的差异变得不显著(HR=。86年,p = .782)。急性症状严重程度(HR=0.98;p <; 0.001-0.010)和精神病史(HR= 0.27-0.36;P ≤ 0.034)是两种模型中症状持续时间的独立预测因子。本研究结果表明,在1级创伤中心就诊的TBI和GCS 13-15患者与SRC患者相比,在症状恢复和严重程度上存在显著差异,而不考虑年龄、性别和精神病史的人群差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信