Hao Chen, Isabelle Y.S. Chan, Zhao Dong, Twum-Ampofo Samuel
{"title":"Unraveling trust in collaborative human-machine intelligence from neurophysiological perspective: a review of EEG and fNIRS features","authors":"Hao Chen, Isabelle Y.S. Chan, Zhao Dong, Twum-Ampofo Samuel","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the advancement of artificial intelligence and intelligent technologies, machines have evolved beyond mere mechanical tools and now possess human-like capabilities, including sensing and decision-making. This has led to the emergence of Collaboration in Human-Machine Intelligence (CHMI) as machine intelligence becomes more integrated into collaborative work, with trust serving as the foundational mechanism. By comprehending the concept of trust and its influencing factors, machines have the potential to adapt to human trust states, thereby enhancing the overall CHMI experience. A prerequisite for achieving this is the precise real-time measurement of trust. Neuroimaging technologies, as means to measure neurophysiological responses, have shown the potential to map brain functions and cognitive processes involving trust directly. However, methodological and context variations have led to dispersed neurophysiological evidence related to trust. Therefore, this paper comprehensively summarizes neuroimaging-based trust measurement in CHMI, employing electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) as representative neuroimaging tools. A systematic literature review was conducted on Scopus and the Web of Science, and 56 relevant articles were identified. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of these articles revealed a diverse range of neuroimaging tools being used in different CHMI contexts. The neurophysiological-trust relationship has been studied using various methodological perspectives, including time–frequency analysis, event-related potential (ERP), and connectivity analysis. These investigations have identified multiple brain features associated with trust, some of which demonstrate consistency while others show inconsistency. These findings suggest a lack of coherence in trust-related neurophysiological features. Accordingly, three main limitations are identified: a lack of standard methodologies, insufficient focus on connectivity analysis, and a dearth of multimodal and machine learning analysis. Five future directions are proposed to address these limitations and facilitate real-time trust estimation using neuroimaging tools. These directions aim to overcome the identified limitations and pave the way for developing trustworthy CHMI systems. The practical implications of this study lie in informing the design and implementation of such systems, ultimately leading to improved team performance and the establishment of more efficient and reliable collaborative systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 103555"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625004483","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the advancement of artificial intelligence and intelligent technologies, machines have evolved beyond mere mechanical tools and now possess human-like capabilities, including sensing and decision-making. This has led to the emergence of Collaboration in Human-Machine Intelligence (CHMI) as machine intelligence becomes more integrated into collaborative work, with trust serving as the foundational mechanism. By comprehending the concept of trust and its influencing factors, machines have the potential to adapt to human trust states, thereby enhancing the overall CHMI experience. A prerequisite for achieving this is the precise real-time measurement of trust. Neuroimaging technologies, as means to measure neurophysiological responses, have shown the potential to map brain functions and cognitive processes involving trust directly. However, methodological and context variations have led to dispersed neurophysiological evidence related to trust. Therefore, this paper comprehensively summarizes neuroimaging-based trust measurement in CHMI, employing electroencephalography (EEG) and functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) as representative neuroimaging tools. A systematic literature review was conducted on Scopus and the Web of Science, and 56 relevant articles were identified. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of these articles revealed a diverse range of neuroimaging tools being used in different CHMI contexts. The neurophysiological-trust relationship has been studied using various methodological perspectives, including time–frequency analysis, event-related potential (ERP), and connectivity analysis. These investigations have identified multiple brain features associated with trust, some of which demonstrate consistency while others show inconsistency. These findings suggest a lack of coherence in trust-related neurophysiological features. Accordingly, three main limitations are identified: a lack of standard methodologies, insufficient focus on connectivity analysis, and a dearth of multimodal and machine learning analysis. Five future directions are proposed to address these limitations and facilitate real-time trust estimation using neuroimaging tools. These directions aim to overcome the identified limitations and pave the way for developing trustworthy CHMI systems. The practical implications of this study lie in informing the design and implementation of such systems, ultimately leading to improved team performance and the establishment of more efficient and reliable collaborative systems.
随着人工智能和智能技术的进步,机器已经超越了单纯的机械工具,现在拥有了类似人类的能力,包括感知和决策。这导致了人机智能协作(CHMI)的出现,因为机器智能越来越多地集成到协作工作中,信任是基础机制。通过理解信任的概念及其影响因素,机器有可能适应人类的信任状态,从而增强整体的CHMI体验。实现这一目标的先决条件是对信任进行精确的实时测量。神经成像技术作为测量神经生理反应的手段,已经显示出直接绘制涉及信任的大脑功能和认知过程的潜力。然而,方法和背景的差异导致了与信任相关的神经生理学证据的分散。因此,本文以脑电图(EEG)和功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)为代表的神经影像学工具,全面总结了基于神经影像学的信任测量在CHMI中的应用。对Scopus和Web of Science进行系统的文献综述,筛选出56篇相关文章。这些文章的定量和定性分析揭示了在不同的CHMI背景下使用的各种神经成像工具。神经生理-信任关系的研究采用了多种方法,包括时频分析、事件相关电位(ERP)和连通性分析。这些研究已经确定了与信任相关的多种大脑特征,其中一些表现出一致性,而另一些则表现出不一致性。这些发现表明,与信任相关的神经生理特征缺乏一致性。因此,确定了三个主要限制:缺乏标准方法,对连通性分析的关注不足,以及缺乏多模态和机器学习分析。提出了五个未来的方向来解决这些限制,并促进使用神经成像工具进行实时信任估计。这些方向旨在克服已确定的限制,为开发可信赖的CHMI系统铺平道路。本研究的实际意义在于为这些系统的设计和实施提供信息,最终导致团队绩效的提高,并建立更有效和可靠的协作系统。
期刊介绍:
Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.