Cathryn T Lee,Sheiphali A Gandhi,Seham Elmrayed,Hayley Barnes,Diane Lorenzetti,Margaret L Salisbury,Iain D Stewart,Christopher Barber,Cheryl E Peters,Johanna Feary,Kerri A Johannson
{"title":"Inhalational exposures associated with risk of interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Cathryn T Lee,Sheiphali A Gandhi,Seham Elmrayed,Hayley Barnes,Diane Lorenzetti,Margaret L Salisbury,Iain D Stewart,Christopher Barber,Cheryl E Peters,Johanna Feary,Kerri A Johannson","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE\r\nInhalational exposures are associated with risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet the relationship between specific exposures and ILD is poorly characterised.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nIdentify inhalational exposures associated with ILD and estimate the effects of exposures on ILD risk.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nMEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1990 to 2022 to identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD diagnosis. ILDs where causality is well-established (hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumoconiosis) and sarcoidosis were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts with full-text review and data extraction of eligible studies. Where possible, data were pooled and multilevel meta-analysis was specified using a random effects model. Sources of heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed.\r\n\r\nMAIN RESULTS\r\n96 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 40 819 116 subjects (295 167 had ILD, 40 523 949 controls). For the meta-analysis, 54 studies were included (40 490 793 subjects: 273 899 ILD, 40 216 894 controls). Exposures associated with significantly increased ILD risk included smoking (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.94), organic exposures (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.16), metals (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.16), dust (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76) and asbestos (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.15). Silica and fumes had positive associations with ILD that trended towards significance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis is the first to comprehensively assess the effect of inhalational exposures on overall risk of ILD, with multiple putative exposures identified. Future work should investigate novel occupational exposures associated with ILD, characterise the gene-environment interaction and develop preventative strategies.\r\n\r\nPROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nCRD42022292908.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
RATIONALE
Inhalational exposures are associated with risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet the relationship between specific exposures and ILD is poorly characterised.
OBJECTIVE
Identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD and estimate the effects of exposures on ILD risk.
METHODS
MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1990 to 2022 to identify inhalational exposures associated with ILD diagnosis. ILDs where causality is well-established (hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumoconiosis) and sarcoidosis were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts with full-text review and data extraction of eligible studies. Where possible, data were pooled and multilevel meta-analysis was specified using a random effects model. Sources of heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed.
MAIN RESULTS
96 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 40 819 116 subjects (295 167 had ILD, 40 523 949 controls). For the meta-analysis, 54 studies were included (40 490 793 subjects: 273 899 ILD, 40 216 894 controls). Exposures associated with significantly increased ILD risk included smoking (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.94), organic exposures (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.16), metals (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.16), dust (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76) and asbestos (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.15). Silica and fumes had positive associations with ILD that trended towards significance.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis is the first to comprehensively assess the effect of inhalational exposures on overall risk of ILD, with multiple putative exposures identified. Future work should investigate novel occupational exposures associated with ILD, characterise the gene-environment interaction and develop preventative strategies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022292908.
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.