Increased prevalence, ER visits, and hospitalizations in medicare systemic lupus erythematosus patients living in socially vulnerable counties: A cross-sectional study.

Emily R Cosentino, James C Oates Jim
{"title":"Increased prevalence, ER visits, and hospitalizations in medicare systemic lupus erythematosus patients living in socially vulnerable counties: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Emily R Cosentino, James C Oates Jim","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately affects women, minorities, and individuals with low socioeconomic status. We hypothesized that counties with a higher percentage of disadvantaged individuals have a higher prevalence of SLE and increased acute hospital events, including emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations, among Medicare patients with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and Lupus Research Alliance's Lupus Index Medicare data. SLE was identified through Medicare fee-for-service administrative records from 2016 containing two or more ICD-10 codes for SLE. We examined SLE prevalence, acute hospital events, and their association with county-level SVI rankings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was 89 % female and 69 % White, with 22 % Black. SVI ranking (r = 0.508) and its subthemes correlated with SLE prevalence, with socioeconomic status and household composition showing the strongest associations (R = 0.431 and R = 0.365, respectively). Similar but weaker correlations were seen between SVI and acute healthcare events, including ER visits and hospitalizations. Limitations include the cross-sectional design preventing longitudinal analysis, reliance on administrative data potentially introducing bias, and exclusion of counties with fewer than 10 SLE patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study linking county-level vulnerability to SLE prevalence and healthcare events in a Medicare SLE population. Findings suggest that social and environmental factors influence SLE risk and healthcare utilization, much like other chronic diseases. The modest association between location and hospital/ER events suggests that structural factors may act as barriers to optimal care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.05.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately affects women, minorities, and individuals with low socioeconomic status. We hypothesized that counties with a higher percentage of disadvantaged individuals have a higher prevalence of SLE and increased acute hospital events, including emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations, among Medicare patients with SLE.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and Lupus Research Alliance's Lupus Index Medicare data. SLE was identified through Medicare fee-for-service administrative records from 2016 containing two or more ICD-10 codes for SLE. We examined SLE prevalence, acute hospital events, and their association with county-level SVI rankings.

Results: The study population was 89 % female and 69 % White, with 22 % Black. SVI ranking (r = 0.508) and its subthemes correlated with SLE prevalence, with socioeconomic status and household composition showing the strongest associations (R = 0.431 and R = 0.365, respectively). Similar but weaker correlations were seen between SVI and acute healthcare events, including ER visits and hospitalizations. Limitations include the cross-sectional design preventing longitudinal analysis, reliance on administrative data potentially introducing bias, and exclusion of counties with fewer than 10 SLE patients.

Conclusions: This is the first study linking county-level vulnerability to SLE prevalence and healthcare events in a Medicare SLE population. Findings suggest that social and environmental factors influence SLE risk and healthcare utilization, much like other chronic diseases. The modest association between location and hospital/ER events suggests that structural factors may act as barriers to optimal care and outcomes.

生活在社会脆弱县的医保系统性红斑狼疮患者患病率、急诊就诊和住院率增加:一项横断面研究。
背景:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)不成比例地影响妇女、少数民族和社会经济地位低的个体。我们假设弱势个体比例较高的县SLE患病率较高,急性住院事件增加,包括急诊(ER)就诊和住院治疗,在医疗保险SLE患者中。方法:本横断面研究使用疾病控制和预防中心的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)和狼疮研究联盟的狼疮指数医疗保险数据。SLE是通过包含两个或多个SLE ICD-10代码的2016年医疗保险服务收费管理记录确定的。我们检查了SLE患病率、急性住院事件及其与县级SVI排名的关系。结果:研究人群中女性占89%,白人占69%,黑人占22%。SVI排名(r = 0.508)及其子主题与SLE患病率相关,其中社会经济地位和家庭构成相关性最强(r = 0.431和r = 0.365)。SVI与急性医疗事件(包括急诊室就诊和住院)之间存在类似但较弱的相关性。局限性包括横断面设计不能进行纵向分析,依赖行政数据可能引入偏倚,排除了少于10例SLE患者的县。结论:这是第一个在医疗保险SLE人群中将县级易感性与SLE患病率和医疗事件联系起来的研究。研究结果表明,与其他慢性疾病一样,社会和环境因素影响SLE风险和医疗保健利用。地点与医院/急诊室事件之间的适度关联表明,结构性因素可能成为最佳护理和结果的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信