Zahra Mahdikhani, Shahideh Jahanian Sadatmahalleh, Zainab Alimoradi, Abbas Habibelahi
{"title":"Explaining the experiences of donors, recipients, and healthcare providers regarding milk donation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.","authors":"Zahra Mahdikhani, Shahideh Jahanian Sadatmahalleh, Zainab Alimoradi, Abbas Habibelahi","doi":"10.1186/s13006-025-00740-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization recommends Donated Human Milk as the first option if maternal milk is unavailable. In this research, the researchers intend to obtain a set of in-depth information about the experiences of mothers and healthcare workers of human milk bank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content analysis method was used to carry out this meta-synthesis. The modified PECO-S method was used to determine the inclusion criteria. A comprehensive search without a time limit for studies was performed using \"milk bank\" and related combined keywords. A combination of electronic and manual searches of several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest, was performed. First, the titles and abstracts were examined by two reviewers. Two researchers used the Joanna Briggs Institute tool to evaluate the quality of the studies. All findings of eligible studies were considered, and the open coding was used for data analysis. The codes were extracted from each article's text. Finally, the concepts were coded again to obtain the themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relevant qualitative studies were reviewed, and a total of 36 articles were subjected to meta-synthesis. The total number of participants included in the studies was 1,389, ranging in age 14-45 years. From the total of 134 extracted codes, 25 subcategories, eight categories, and four main themes were obtained: a) Donating milk, reviving two lives, b) Empathy and all-round support necessary to promote milk donation, c) Receiving donated milk: the paradox of choosing health or disease, and d) Development and facilitation of the infrastructure required to improve milk donation and receiving services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the study results on the experience of milk donation, educational programs can be designed to encourage milk donation. Empathy and support for encouraging milk donation should be provided at the family, community, and healthcare system. Incorrect beliefs lead to hesitation in accepting donated milk. Health policymakers need to implement actions to correct these negative beliefs. The development and facilitation of milk bank infrastructure are essential for improving milk bank services. It is necessary to update the awareness of community and facilitate the use of milk bank services.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00740-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization recommends Donated Human Milk as the first option if maternal milk is unavailable. In this research, the researchers intend to obtain a set of in-depth information about the experiences of mothers and healthcare workers of human milk bank.
Methods: A content analysis method was used to carry out this meta-synthesis. The modified PECO-S method was used to determine the inclusion criteria. A comprehensive search without a time limit for studies was performed using "milk bank" and related combined keywords. A combination of electronic and manual searches of several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Embase, Web of Science, and ProQuest, was performed. First, the titles and abstracts were examined by two reviewers. Two researchers used the Joanna Briggs Institute tool to evaluate the quality of the studies. All findings of eligible studies were considered, and the open coding was used for data analysis. The codes were extracted from each article's text. Finally, the concepts were coded again to obtain the themes.
Results: Relevant qualitative studies were reviewed, and a total of 36 articles were subjected to meta-synthesis. The total number of participants included in the studies was 1,389, ranging in age 14-45 years. From the total of 134 extracted codes, 25 subcategories, eight categories, and four main themes were obtained: a) Donating milk, reviving two lives, b) Empathy and all-round support necessary to promote milk donation, c) Receiving donated milk: the paradox of choosing health or disease, and d) Development and facilitation of the infrastructure required to improve milk donation and receiving services.
Conclusions: Based on the study results on the experience of milk donation, educational programs can be designed to encourage milk donation. Empathy and support for encouraging milk donation should be provided at the family, community, and healthcare system. Incorrect beliefs lead to hesitation in accepting donated milk. Health policymakers need to implement actions to correct these negative beliefs. The development and facilitation of milk bank infrastructure are essential for improving milk bank services. It is necessary to update the awareness of community and facilitate the use of milk bank services.
背景:世界卫生组织建议,如果没有母乳,捐献的母乳是第一选择。在这项研究中,研究人员打算获得一套关于母乳库的母亲和医护人员的经验的深入信息。方法:采用含量分析法进行meta综合。采用改进的PECO-S法确定纳入标准。使用“牛奶银行”和相关的组合关键词进行了全面的搜索,没有时间限制。对PubMed、Scopus、Science Direct、Embase、Web of Science和ProQuest等数据库进行了电子和手动搜索。首先,由两位审稿人对标题和摘要进行审查。两名研究人员使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具来评估研究的质量。考虑所有符合条件的研究结果,并使用开放编码进行数据分析。这些代码是从每篇文章的正文中摘录出来的。最后,再次对概念进行编码,得到主题。结果:对相关定性研究进行综述,共纳入36篇文献进行meta-synthesis。参与研究的总人数为1389人,年龄在14-45岁之间。从提取的134个代码中,得到25个小类别,8个类别,4个主题:a)捐赠牛奶,挽救两个生命;b)促进捐赠牛奶所需的移情和全方位支持;c)接受捐赠的牛奶:选择健康或疾病的悖论;d)改善捐赠和接受服务所需基础设施的发展和便利。结论:基于对母乳捐赠经验的研究结果,可以设计鼓励母乳捐赠的教育方案。应该在家庭、社区和卫生保健系统中为鼓励母乳捐赠提供同情和支持。不正确的信念导致接受捐赠的牛奶犹豫不决。卫生政策制定者需要采取行动纠正这些消极观念。母乳库基础设施的发展和便利化对改善母乳库服务至关重要。有必要提高社区的意识,促进母乳银行服务的使用。
期刊介绍:
Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks.
Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.