Rethinking end-of-life decisions through the ethics of care.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Meta Krajnc, Erika Zelko, Urh Groselj
{"title":"Rethinking end-of-life decisions through the ethics of care.","authors":"Meta Krajnc, Erika Zelko, Urh Groselj","doi":"10.1177/09697330251350388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although principles-based approaches have long been a cornerstone of bioethics and remain well-suited to many aspects of medical ethics, their reliance on deductive reasoning and emphasis on individualistic interpretations of autonomy often fall short in addressing the nuanced complexities of end-of-life (EOL) issues. The Ethics of Care (EoC) provides a comprehensive anthropological and ethical framework that is well-suited for EOL decision-making, including treatment limitations. This article explores the application of EoC to EOL care, proposing that decisions should prioritize care, compassion, relational networks, and context-sensitive judgements rather than the deduction of abstract principles. The inherent tension between EoC as a theoretical framework and its strong orientation toward concrete, relational practice is also discussed. While EoC cannot provide prescriptive steps, it offers valuable insights to complement traditional approaches to ethics. Following it, we propose eight practical guides for improving EOL decision-making. They represent an interpretation of EoC's core elements, interpreted for the specific challenges of treatment limitation. The practical guides are as follows: (1) building a trusting relationship with the patient, (2) identification of the patient's needs and values, (3) respect for the patient's relational part of autonomy, (4) identifying good treatment for the patient, (5) recognition of HCP's own inclinations and interests, (6) weighing different responsibilities, (7) shared decision-making towards best care, and (8) ensuring continuity of care and openness to change. Integrating the EoC perspective into clinical practice can enhance healthcare professionals' ability to navigate the ethical challenges at the EOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251350388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251350388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although principles-based approaches have long been a cornerstone of bioethics and remain well-suited to many aspects of medical ethics, their reliance on deductive reasoning and emphasis on individualistic interpretations of autonomy often fall short in addressing the nuanced complexities of end-of-life (EOL) issues. The Ethics of Care (EoC) provides a comprehensive anthropological and ethical framework that is well-suited for EOL decision-making, including treatment limitations. This article explores the application of EoC to EOL care, proposing that decisions should prioritize care, compassion, relational networks, and context-sensitive judgements rather than the deduction of abstract principles. The inherent tension between EoC as a theoretical framework and its strong orientation toward concrete, relational practice is also discussed. While EoC cannot provide prescriptive steps, it offers valuable insights to complement traditional approaches to ethics. Following it, we propose eight practical guides for improving EOL decision-making. They represent an interpretation of EoC's core elements, interpreted for the specific challenges of treatment limitation. The practical guides are as follows: (1) building a trusting relationship with the patient, (2) identification of the patient's needs and values, (3) respect for the patient's relational part of autonomy, (4) identifying good treatment for the patient, (5) recognition of HCP's own inclinations and interests, (6) weighing different responsibilities, (7) shared decision-making towards best care, and (8) ensuring continuity of care and openness to change. Integrating the EoC perspective into clinical practice can enhance healthcare professionals' ability to navigate the ethical challenges at the EOL.

通过护理伦理重新思考临终决定。
尽管基于原则的方法长期以来一直是生物伦理学的基石,并且仍然非常适合医学伦理学的许多方面,但它们对演绎推理的依赖和对自主的个人主义解释的强调在解决生命末期(EOL)问题的微妙复杂性方面往往不足。护理伦理(EoC)提供了一个全面的人类学和伦理学框架,非常适合EOL决策,包括治疗限制。本文探讨了EoC在EOL护理中的应用,提出决策应优先考虑护理、同情、关系网络和情境敏感判断,而不是抽象原则的推导。本文还讨论了EoC作为一种理论框架与其强烈的具体关联实践取向之间的内在张力。虽然EoC不能提供规范性步骤,但它提供了宝贵的见解,以补充传统的道德方法。在此基础上,我们提出了改善EOL决策的8条实用指南。它们代表了EoC核心要素的解释,解释了治疗限制的具体挑战。实践指南如下:(1)与患者建立信任关系,(2)确定患者的需求和价值观,(3)尊重患者自主的关系部分,(4)确定对患者的良好治疗,(5)承认HCP自己的倾向和兴趣,(6)权衡不同的责任,(7)共同决策最佳护理,(8)确保护理的连续性和对变化的开放性。将EoC的观点整合到临床实践中可以提高医疗保健专业人员在EOL中应对道德挑战的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信