New artificial neural network models for risk assessment of skin sensitization using amino acid derivative assay, KeratinoSens™, human cell line activation test and in silico structural alert parameter
{"title":"New artificial neural network models for risk assessment of skin sensitization using amino acid derivative assay, KeratinoSens™, human cell line activation test and in silico structural alert parameter","authors":"Kosuke Imai, Yuri Hatakeyama, Shiho Oeda, Toshiyuki Ohtake, Tomomi Atobe, Morihiko Hirota","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) of skin sensitization, estimating the point of departure (PoD) is crucial. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been considered the ‘gold standard’ for evaluating the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals, with the LLNA EC3 values serving as the PoD for dermal quantitative risk assessment (QRA). This study presents artificial neural network (ANN) models that predict EC3 values, enhanced by integrating the Amino Acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA) to expand the applicability domain. Initially, descriptors derived from ADRA, based on both molar and gravimetric concentrations, showed significant correlations with LLNA EC3 values. We then constructed prediction models using ANN analysis, incorporating parameters from GL497-adopted methods. These models exhibited a strong correlation with LLNA EC3 values. The predicted EC3 values for molar and gravimetric concentrations correlated well with each other and with previous values from an ANN model using DPRA instead of ADRA. Additionally, the prediction accuracy of ANN models combined with “2 out of 3″ negative judgment for GHS classification was comparable to that of ITSv1/v2. Ultimately, this enables QRA for a broader range of substances using predictive EC3 values as PoDs without animal testing, paving the way for more effective risk assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) of skin sensitization, estimating the point of departure (PoD) is crucial. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been considered the ‘gold standard’ for evaluating the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals, with the LLNA EC3 values serving as the PoD for dermal quantitative risk assessment (QRA). This study presents artificial neural network (ANN) models that predict EC3 values, enhanced by integrating the Amino Acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA) to expand the applicability domain. Initially, descriptors derived from ADRA, based on both molar and gravimetric concentrations, showed significant correlations with LLNA EC3 values. We then constructed prediction models using ANN analysis, incorporating parameters from GL497-adopted methods. These models exhibited a strong correlation with LLNA EC3 values. The predicted EC3 values for molar and gravimetric concentrations correlated well with each other and with previous values from an ANN model using DPRA instead of ADRA. Additionally, the prediction accuracy of ANN models combined with “2 out of 3″ negative judgment for GHS classification was comparable to that of ITSv1/v2. Ultimately, this enables QRA for a broader range of substances using predictive EC3 values as PoDs without animal testing, paving the way for more effective risk assessments.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)