The impact of cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on the outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a national-level analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pavol Tomasov, Zuzana Motovska, Ota Hlinomaz, Petr Kala, Marek Sramko, Jan Mrozek, Milan Hromadka, Jan Precek, Josef Bis, Jan Matejka, Tamilla Muzafarova, Pavel Cervinka, Ales Kovarik, Libor Sknouril, Zdenek Coufal, Jiri Jarkovsky
{"title":"The impact of cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on the outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a national-level analysis.","authors":"Pavol Tomasov, Zuzana Motovska, Ota Hlinomaz, Petr Kala, Marek Sramko, Jan Mrozek, Milan Hromadka, Jan Precek, Josef Bis, Jan Matejka, Tamilla Muzafarova, Pavel Cervinka, Ales Kovarik, Libor Sknouril, Zdenek Coufal, Jiri Jarkovsky","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03984-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are events with profound implications for patient outcomes. We aim to analyze the predictors of CS and OHCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction and their effects on mortality. The analysis is based on data from a national registry between 2016 and 2020. A total of 23,703 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were analyzed: (A) patients without CS and OHCA (19,590), (B) after OHCA (2,262), (C) with CS (713), and (D) after OHCA with CS (1,138). Patients after OHCA without CS had the lowest mean age [62.0 (± 12.6) years], while patients with CS without OHCA were the oldest [68.8 (± 11.8) years] and had the highest proportions of comorbidities. CS was a predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality, with odds ratios [OR; 95% confidence intervals (CI)] of 5.52 (4.51; 6.75) and 4.66 (3.87; 5.61) for patients after OHCA, and OR (95% CI) 9.28 (7.56; 11.38) and 7.33 (6.04; 8.89) for those without OHCA. For overall survival up to 30 days and in comparison to patients without CS and OHCA, the hazard ratios (95% CI) was 2.77 (2.40; 3.20) for patients with OHCA only, 14.36 (12.57; 16.40) for patients with CS only, and 16.96 (15.19; 18.92) for patients with both CS and OHCA. OHCA altered the 30-day mortality risk after STEMI for both patients with and without CS. CS is a predictor of both 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with STEMI, irrespective of OHCA status.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03984-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are events with profound implications for patient outcomes. We aim to analyze the predictors of CS and OHCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction and their effects on mortality. The analysis is based on data from a national registry between 2016 and 2020. A total of 23,703 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were analyzed: (A) patients without CS and OHCA (19,590), (B) after OHCA (2,262), (C) with CS (713), and (D) after OHCA with CS (1,138). Patients after OHCA without CS had the lowest mean age [62.0 (± 12.6) years], while patients with CS without OHCA were the oldest [68.8 (± 11.8) years] and had the highest proportions of comorbidities. CS was a predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality, with odds ratios [OR; 95% confidence intervals (CI)] of 5.52 (4.51; 6.75) and 4.66 (3.87; 5.61) for patients after OHCA, and OR (95% CI) 9.28 (7.56; 11.38) and 7.33 (6.04; 8.89) for those without OHCA. For overall survival up to 30 days and in comparison to patients without CS and OHCA, the hazard ratios (95% CI) was 2.77 (2.40; 3.20) for patients with OHCA only, 14.36 (12.57; 16.40) for patients with CS only, and 16.96 (15.19; 18.92) for patients with both CS and OHCA. OHCA altered the 30-day mortality risk after STEMI for both patients with and without CS. CS is a predictor of both 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with STEMI, irrespective of OHCA status.

心源性休克和院外心脏骤停对急性心肌梗死结局的影响:一项国家级分析。
心源性休克(CS)和院外心脏骤停(OHCA)是对患者预后有深远影响的事件。我们的目的是分析急性心肌梗死患者CS和OHCA的预测因素及其对死亡率的影响。该分析基于2016年至2020年国家登记处的数据。共分析了23,703例st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者:(A)无CS合并OHCA患者(19,590),(B) OHCA后患者(2,262),(C)合并CS患者(713),(D) OHCA后合并CS患者(1,138)。OHCA后无CS的患者平均年龄最低[62.0(±12.6)岁],而无OHCA的CS患者年龄最大[68.8(±11.8)岁],合并症比例最高。CS是30天和1年死亡率的预测因子,比值比[OR;95%置信区间(CI)为5.52 (4.51;6.75)和4.66 (3.87;5.61), OR (95% CI) 9.28 (7.56;11.38)和7.33 (6.04;8.89)对于没有OHCA的人。对于30天的总生存期,与没有CS和OHCA的患者相比,风险比(95% CI)为2.77 (2.40;仅OHCA患者为3.20),14.36 (12.57;仅CS患者为16.40),16.96 (15.19;18.92)对于CS和OHCA患者。OHCA改变了伴有和不伴有CS的STEMI患者的30天死亡风险。CS是STEMI患者30天和1年死亡率的预测因子,与OHCA状态无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信