Diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors: a decision-making analysis among European sarcoma centers.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ali Naimi, Paul Martin Putora, Christian Rothermundt, Antonia Digklia, Jose Manuel Asencio, Sylvie Bonvalot, Florian Bösch, Anant Desai, Amer James Durrani, Haim Gutman, Daphne Hompes, Jens Jakob, Wolfram Trudo Knoefel, Elisabetta Pennacchioli, Piotr Rutkowski, Winan J van Houdt, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Stephan Waelti, Tim Steffen Fischer, Stefan Markart, Simon Wildermuth, Tobias Johannes Dietrich
{"title":"Diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors: a decision-making analysis among European sarcoma centers.","authors":"Ali Naimi, Paul Martin Putora, Christian Rothermundt, Antonia Digklia, Jose Manuel Asencio, Sylvie Bonvalot, Florian Bösch, Anant Desai, Amer James Durrani, Haim Gutman, Daphne Hompes, Jens Jakob, Wolfram Trudo Knoefel, Elisabetta Pennacchioli, Piotr Rutkowski, Winan J van Houdt, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Stephan Waelti, Tim Steffen Fischer, Stefan Markart, Simon Wildermuth, Tobias Johannes Dietrich","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-02012-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lipomatous soft-tissue tumors present a diagnostic burden. The aim of this work was to compare standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the diagnostic management of lipomatous soft-tissue tumors among European academic centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experts of the Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were asked for their SOPs in the diagnosis of adipocytic soft-tissue tumors in an otherwise healthy patient. The answers were converted to decision trees and subsequently compared using the objective consensus methodology. Mediastinal and retroperitoneal lipomatous tumors were excluded from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest consensus (93%) among fourteen institutions was noted for evaluation with core needle biopsy (CNB) as SOP for lipomatous tumors located deep in tissue exceeding 7 cm and tumor-associated symptoms. Evaluation of heterogeneous features on imaging by CNB usually showed a consensus rate of at least 75%. Consensus was less likely for lipomatous tumors without symptoms or heterogeneous features. In these settings, CNB and follow-up were almost equally recommended. For lipomatous tumors smaller than 3 cm, without growth or symptoms, no localization in the trunk, and homogeneous imaging features, a consensus rate of 71% was achieved for follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SOPs for diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors varied despite their geographical proximity. The highest consensus for biopsy was for deep large tumors with associated symptoms. For follow-up, consensus was shown for small homogenous tumors outside the trunk, without growth or symptoms. Consensus on resection involved homogeneous deeply located small tumors outside the trunk with growth and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>This study identifies the decision-making criteria with the highest consensus rate among participating academic sarcoma centers in diagnosing lipomatous tumors: tumors located deep in the tissue, a tumor size exceeding 7 cm, and associated symptoms emerge as pivotal criteria.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Standard operating procedures for diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors among fourteen sarcoma centers were analyzed. Identified diagnostic criteria are: imaging features, size, growth, symptoms, superficial and trunk location. The highest consensus concerned recommending biopsies for deep tumors > 7 cm with associated symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02012-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Lipomatous soft-tissue tumors present a diagnostic burden. The aim of this work was to compare standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the diagnostic management of lipomatous soft-tissue tumors among European academic centers.

Methods: Experts of the Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were asked for their SOPs in the diagnosis of adipocytic soft-tissue tumors in an otherwise healthy patient. The answers were converted to decision trees and subsequently compared using the objective consensus methodology. Mediastinal and retroperitoneal lipomatous tumors were excluded from the analysis.

Results: The highest consensus (93%) among fourteen institutions was noted for evaluation with core needle biopsy (CNB) as SOP for lipomatous tumors located deep in tissue exceeding 7 cm and tumor-associated symptoms. Evaluation of heterogeneous features on imaging by CNB usually showed a consensus rate of at least 75%. Consensus was less likely for lipomatous tumors without symptoms or heterogeneous features. In these settings, CNB and follow-up were almost equally recommended. For lipomatous tumors smaller than 3 cm, without growth or symptoms, no localization in the trunk, and homogeneous imaging features, a consensus rate of 71% was achieved for follow-up.

Conclusions: SOPs for diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors varied despite their geographical proximity. The highest consensus for biopsy was for deep large tumors with associated symptoms. For follow-up, consensus was shown for small homogenous tumors outside the trunk, without growth or symptoms. Consensus on resection involved homogeneous deeply located small tumors outside the trunk with growth and symptoms.

Critical relevance statement: This study identifies the decision-making criteria with the highest consensus rate among participating academic sarcoma centers in diagnosing lipomatous tumors: tumors located deep in the tissue, a tumor size exceeding 7 cm, and associated symptoms emerge as pivotal criteria.

Key points: Standard operating procedures for diagnostic work-up of lipomatous tumors among fourteen sarcoma centers were analyzed. Identified diagnostic criteria are: imaging features, size, growth, symptoms, superficial and trunk location. The highest consensus concerned recommending biopsies for deep tumors > 7 cm with associated symptoms.

脂肪瘤肿瘤的诊断检查:欧洲肉瘤中心的决策分析。
目的:脂肪瘤性软组织肿瘤是一种诊断负担。这项工作的目的是比较标准操作程序(sop)的诊断管理脂肪瘤性软组织肿瘤在欧洲学术中心。方法:向欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织软组织和骨肉瘤组的专家询问他们诊断脂肪细胞性软组织肿瘤的标准操作程序。答案被转换为决策树,随后使用客观共识方法进行比较。纵隔和腹膜后脂肪瘤被排除在分析之外。结果:在14家机构中,对于位于组织深处超过7厘米的脂肪瘤性肿瘤和肿瘤相关症状,核心针活检(CNB)作为SOP的评估一致性最高(93%)。CNB对影像上非均匀特征的评估通常显示至少75%的共识率。没有症状或异质性特征的脂肪瘤性肿瘤不太可能达成共识。在这些情况下,CNB和后续治疗几乎同样被推荐。对于小于3cm、无生长、无症状、无躯干定位、影像学特征均匀的脂肪瘤性肿瘤,随访的共识率为71%。结论:尽管地理位置相近,但用于脂肪瘤性肿瘤诊断的标准操作规程各不相同。活检的最高共识是有相关症状的深部大肿瘤。在随访中,对于躯干外无生长或无症状的小的同质性肿瘤均表现出共识。共识切除涉及同质深位小肿瘤外的干生长和症状。关键相关性声明:本研究确定了参与学术肉瘤中心在诊断脂肪瘤性肿瘤时共识率最高的决策标准:肿瘤位于组织深处,肿瘤大小超过7cm,并出现相关症状作为关键标准。重点:分析了14个肉瘤中心的脂肪瘤性肿瘤诊断检查的标准操作程序。确定的诊断标准是:影像学特征、大小、生长、症状、体表和躯干位置。最一致的意见是建议对直径约为70厘米并伴有相关症状的深部肿瘤进行活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信