Machine learning-based models for outcome prediction in skull base and spinal chordomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Azin Ebrahimi, Salem M Tos, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade, Mohammad Amin Habibi
{"title":"Machine learning-based models for outcome prediction in skull base and spinal chordomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Azin Ebrahimi, Salem M Tos, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade, Mohammad Amin Habibi","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09053-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chordomas are primary bone lesions originating from embryonic notochord remnants, most commonly developing along the skull base and spine. Managing chordomas is challenging due to the complex surgical approaches and significant resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Consequently, the prognosis for chordoma treatment is unfavorable. We aimed to systematically assess the outcomes of machine learning (ML) models in predicting progression, recurrence, and survival in chordoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search on January 28, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. ML models that forecast skull base and spinal chordomas and report concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, or specificity were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R with the \"meta\" and \"mada\" packages. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 3525 chordomas were included. The meta-analysis exhibited a pooled C-index of 0.81 (0.79-0.83), an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.9), and an ACC of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77), a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 12.1 (95% CI: 7.1-20.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated that ML models demonstrated robust predictive performance across various outcomes in chordomas, with pooled C-index, AUC, and ACC values ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 in relation to models that forecast progression, recurrence, or survival.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09053-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chordomas are primary bone lesions originating from embryonic notochord remnants, most commonly developing along the skull base and spine. Managing chordomas is challenging due to the complex surgical approaches and significant resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Consequently, the prognosis for chordoma treatment is unfavorable. We aimed to systematically assess the outcomes of machine learning (ML) models in predicting progression, recurrence, and survival in chordoma patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on January 28, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. ML models that forecast skull base and spinal chordomas and report concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, or specificity were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R with the "meta" and "mada" packages. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: Fifteen studies involving 3525 chordomas were included. The meta-analysis exhibited a pooled C-index of 0.81 (0.79-0.83), an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.9), and an ACC of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77), a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 12.1 (95% CI: 7.1-20.6).

Conclusion: Our results indicated that ML models demonstrated robust predictive performance across various outcomes in chordomas, with pooled C-index, AUC, and ACC values ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 in relation to models that forecast progression, recurrence, or survival.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

基于机器学习的颅底和脊索瘤预后预测模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:脊索瘤是起源于胚胎脊索残余物的原发性骨病变,最常见于颅底和脊柱。由于复杂的手术方式和对化疗和放疗的显著耐药性,脊索瘤的治疗具有挑战性。因此,脊索瘤治疗的预后是不利的。我们的目的是系统地评估机器学习(ML)模型在预测脊索瘤患者的进展、复发和生存方面的结果。方法:我们于2025年1月28日在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science中进行了系统检索。包括预测颅底和脊索瘤并报告一致性指数(C-index)、曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性(ACC)、敏感性或特异性的ML模型。随机效应荟萃分析使用R进行“meta”和“mada”软件包。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。结果:纳入15项研究,涉及3525例脊索瘤。荟萃分析显示,合并c指数为0.81 (0.79-0.83),AUC为0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.9), ACC为0.8 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85)。荟萃分析显示,合并敏感性为0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77),特异性为0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81),诊断优势比(DOR)为12.1 (95% CI: 7.1-20.6)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,ML模型在脊索瘤的各种预后中表现出强大的预测性能,与预测进展、复发或生存的模型相关的汇总c指数、AUC和ACC值在0.80至0.86之间。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信