Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Azin Ebrahimi, Salem M Tos, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade, Mohammad Amin Habibi
{"title":"Machine learning-based models for outcome prediction in skull base and spinal chordomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Azin Ebrahimi, Salem M Tos, Rana Hashemi, Arman Hasanzade, Mohammad Amin Habibi","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09053-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chordomas are primary bone lesions originating from embryonic notochord remnants, most commonly developing along the skull base and spine. Managing chordomas is challenging due to the complex surgical approaches and significant resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Consequently, the prognosis for chordoma treatment is unfavorable. We aimed to systematically assess the outcomes of machine learning (ML) models in predicting progression, recurrence, and survival in chordoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search on January 28, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. ML models that forecast skull base and spinal chordomas and report concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, or specificity were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R with the \"meta\" and \"mada\" packages. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 3525 chordomas were included. The meta-analysis exhibited a pooled C-index of 0.81 (0.79-0.83), an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.9), and an ACC of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77), a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 12.1 (95% CI: 7.1-20.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated that ML models demonstrated robust predictive performance across various outcomes in chordomas, with pooled C-index, AUC, and ACC values ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 in relation to models that forecast progression, recurrence, or survival.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09053-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chordomas are primary bone lesions originating from embryonic notochord remnants, most commonly developing along the skull base and spine. Managing chordomas is challenging due to the complex surgical approaches and significant resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Consequently, the prognosis for chordoma treatment is unfavorable. We aimed to systematically assess the outcomes of machine learning (ML) models in predicting progression, recurrence, and survival in chordoma patients.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search on January 28, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. ML models that forecast skull base and spinal chordomas and report concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, or specificity were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R with the "meta" and "mada" packages. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results: Fifteen studies involving 3525 chordomas were included. The meta-analysis exhibited a pooled C-index of 0.81 (0.79-0.83), an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.9), and an ACC of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). The meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77), a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 12.1 (95% CI: 7.1-20.6).
Conclusion: Our results indicated that ML models demonstrated robust predictive performance across various outcomes in chordomas, with pooled C-index, AUC, and ACC values ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 in relation to models that forecast progression, recurrence, or survival.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe