SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Does Limited Stage Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Matter?

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Arina Martynchyk, Eliza A Hawkes
{"title":"SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Does Limited Stage Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Matter?","authors":"Arina Martynchyk, Eliza A Hawkes","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LSDLBCL) has excellent outcomes, but progress in management has been plagued by lack of standard definitions and exclusion from many trials evaluating novel agents in advanced stage DLBCL (ASDLBCL) which increasingly target high-risk populations. LSDLBCL definition varies but is most commonly defined as Ann Arbor stage I-II nonbulky disease (< 10 cm). LSDLBCL patient long-term survival exceeds 90% when treated with standard courses (6-8 cycles) of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Attempts have therefore been made to minimize CIT toxicity via fewer cycles, employing radiotherapy or positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted CIT instead. This has led to significant variation and complexity in LSDLBCL treatment, not least because LSDLBCL definition and trial eligibility have lacked consistency. Four key dedicated LSDLBCL treatment paradigms have evolved beyond the standard 6-8 RCHOP cycles given to ASDLBCL, such as Combined Modality Treatment (CMT), PET-adapted CMT and PET-directed RT, abbreviated RCHOP for young patients with no poor risk factors and PET-adapted CIT. Greater understanding of the biology and risk profiles of LSDLBCL matters, as does tailoring treatment in this unique disease. Ongoing international collaborative efforts to refine treatment paradigms according to risk are required to improve outcomes in these patients. Novel therapy studies should also be part of the immediate research agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.05.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LSDLBCL) has excellent outcomes, but progress in management has been plagued by lack of standard definitions and exclusion from many trials evaluating novel agents in advanced stage DLBCL (ASDLBCL) which increasingly target high-risk populations. LSDLBCL definition varies but is most commonly defined as Ann Arbor stage I-II nonbulky disease (< 10 cm). LSDLBCL patient long-term survival exceeds 90% when treated with standard courses (6-8 cycles) of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Attempts have therefore been made to minimize CIT toxicity via fewer cycles, employing radiotherapy or positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted CIT instead. This has led to significant variation and complexity in LSDLBCL treatment, not least because LSDLBCL definition and trial eligibility have lacked consistency. Four key dedicated LSDLBCL treatment paradigms have evolved beyond the standard 6-8 RCHOP cycles given to ASDLBCL, such as Combined Modality Treatment (CMT), PET-adapted CMT and PET-directed RT, abbreviated RCHOP for young patients with no poor risk factors and PET-adapted CIT. Greater understanding of the biology and risk profiles of LSDLBCL matters, as does tailoring treatment in this unique disease. Ongoing international collaborative efforts to refine treatment paradigms according to risk are required to improve outcomes in these patients. Novel therapy studies should also be part of the immediate research agenda.

SOHO最新进展和下一个问题:有限期弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤重要吗?
有限期弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(LSDLBCL)具有良好的预后,但由于缺乏标准定义和许多评估晚期DLBCL (ASDLBCL)新药的试验被排除在外,治疗进展一直受到困扰,这些新药越来越多地针对高危人群。LSDLBCL的定义各不相同,但最常见的定义是Ann Arbor期I-II期非体积性疾病(< 10 cm)。LSDLBCL患者接受标准疗程(6-8个周期)的化疗免疫治疗(CIT)后,长期生存率超过90%。因此,人们尝试通过更短的周期来减少CIT的毒性,采用放疗或正电子发射断层扫描(PET)代替CIT。这导致了LSDLBCL治疗的显著差异和复杂性,尤其是因为LSDLBCL的定义和试验资格缺乏一致性。除了给予ASDLBCL标准的6-8个RCHOP周期外,四种关键的专用LSDLBCL治疗范式已经发展起来,例如联合治疗(CMT), pet适应的CMT和pet定向的RT,对没有不良危险因素的年轻患者的缩写RCHOP和pet适应的CIT。为了改善这些患者的预后,需要持续的国际合作努力,根据风险改进治疗模式。新疗法研究也应该是近期研究议程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信