Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone video clips against polysomnography for paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Cal McLean, Zachary Jones, Joseph Eliahoo, Parviz Habibi
{"title":"Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone video clips against polysomnography for paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea.","authors":"Cal McLean, Zachary Jones, Joseph Eliahoo, Parviz Habibi","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gold standard of paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) diagnosis is overnight polysomnography (PSG). Validated screening methods for paediatric OSAS are limited. Increasingly, concerned parents record videos that capture behaviours indicative of OSAS. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised sleep video analysis tool (Videosomnography Analysis for Paediatric Sleep Apnoea (VAPS)) against PSG for paediatric OSAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 2-12 years consecutively referred for suspected OSAS underwent PSG. Parents recorded two 1 min videos of their child's sleep during PSG, and for two nights at home post-PSG. Videos were scored for the presence of nine behaviours indicative of OSAS. PSG was scored independently and compared with VAPS scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total VAPS Score had good discriminatory ability between PSG-diagnosed clinically non-significant (n=63) and clinically significant (n=48) OSAS, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 81.99%. Scores of ≥3 had a sensitivity of 92% (specificity=49%) and scores of ≥7 had a specificity of 89% (sensitivity=40%). The area under the ROC curve rose to 85.45% when parents confirmed they were able to capture their child's worst breathing. For this subset, VAPS Score of ≥3 had a sensitivity of 96% (specificity=44%) and scores≥7 had a specificity of 89% (sensitivity=50%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>VAPS Score may be useful in triaging patients suspected of paediatric OSAS to the appropriate physiological sleep investigations or treatment options, where a score of ≤2 is considered low risk, 3-6 medium risk and ≥7 high risk, for paediatric OSAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":"832-836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The gold standard of paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) diagnosis is overnight polysomnography (PSG). Validated screening methods for paediatric OSAS are limited. Increasingly, concerned parents record videos that capture behaviours indicative of OSAS. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised sleep video analysis tool (Videosomnography Analysis for Paediatric Sleep Apnoea (VAPS)) against PSG for paediatric OSAS.

Methods: Children aged 2-12 years consecutively referred for suspected OSAS underwent PSG. Parents recorded two 1 min videos of their child's sleep during PSG, and for two nights at home post-PSG. Videos were scored for the presence of nine behaviours indicative of OSAS. PSG was scored independently and compared with VAPS scores.

Results: Total VAPS Score had good discriminatory ability between PSG-diagnosed clinically non-significant (n=63) and clinically significant (n=48) OSAS, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 81.99%. Scores of ≥3 had a sensitivity of 92% (specificity=49%) and scores of ≥7 had a specificity of 89% (sensitivity=40%). The area under the ROC curve rose to 85.45% when parents confirmed they were able to capture their child's worst breathing. For this subset, VAPS Score of ≥3 had a sensitivity of 96% (specificity=44%) and scores≥7 had a specificity of 89% (sensitivity=50%).

Discussion: VAPS Score may be useful in triaging patients suspected of paediatric OSAS to the appropriate physiological sleep investigations or treatment options, where a score of ≤2 is considered low risk, 3-6 medium risk and ≥7 high risk, for paediatric OSAS.

评估智能手机视频片段与多导睡眠图对儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断准确性。
背景:儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)诊断的金标准是夜间多导睡眠图(PSG)。儿科osaas的有效筛查方法有限。忧心忡忡的家长们越来越多地录制视频,捕捉到表明患有OSAS的行为。我们的目的是比较标准化睡眠视频分析工具(儿童睡眠呼吸暂停视频分析(VAPS))与PSG对儿童OSAS的诊断准确性。方法:对2 ~ 12岁的疑似OSAS患儿行PSG检查。家长们录制了两个1分钟的视频,记录了他们孩子在PSG期间的睡眠情况,以及在PSG结束后的两个晚上。对录像是否存在表明OSAS的九种行为进行评分。PSG独立评分,并与VAPS评分进行比较。结果:VAPS总分对psg诊断为临床不显著(n=63)和临床显著(n=48)的OSAS有较好的区分能力,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为81.99%。评分≥3分的敏感性为92%(特异性=49%),评分≥7分的特异性为89%(敏感性=40%)。当父母确认他们能够捕捉到孩子最糟糕的呼吸时,ROC曲线下的面积上升到85.45%。对于该子集,VAPS评分≥3的敏感性为96%(特异性=44%),评分≥7的特异性为89%(敏感性=50%)。讨论:VAPS评分可能有助于对疑似儿童OSAS的患者进行适当的生理睡眠调查或治疗选择,其中得分≤2被认为是低风险,3-6为中风险,≥7为高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信