Decoding portal vein pulsatility: hemodynamic determinants in a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational trial.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Cosmin Balan, Bianca Morosanu, Antonia Fodoroiu, Vlad Dobre, Andrei Dumitrache, Robert Thomas Barbulescu, Liana Valeanu, Cornel Robu, Cristian Boros, Alexandru Nica, Adrian Wong, Francesco Corradi, Ioana Marina Grintescu, Serban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi
{"title":"Decoding portal vein pulsatility: hemodynamic determinants in a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational trial.","authors":"Cosmin Balan, Bianca Morosanu, Antonia Fodoroiu, Vlad Dobre, Andrei Dumitrache, Robert Thomas Barbulescu, Liana Valeanu, Cornel Robu, Cristian Boros, Alexandru Nica, Adrian Wong, Francesco Corradi, Ioana Marina Grintescu, Serban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01498-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI) reflects systemic congestion and is influenced by both volume status and right ventricular (RV) function. The mean systemic filling pressure analogue (Pmsa), derived from a mathematical model, estimates the interaction between stressed blood volume and systemic vascular compliance, serving as surrogate marker of volume status. This post-hoc analysis of an observational trial investigates the combined role of Pmsa and RV function as determinants of PVPI using echocardiography. Fifty-five mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory failure were included within 6 h of ICU admission following elective open-heart surgery. Fluid-tolerant patients (PVPI < 50%) underwent a passive leg raising (PLR) test; fluid-responsive patients subsequently received 7 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate. PVPI and Pmsa were measured at five timepoints: baseline (T1), after PLR (T2), upon returning to baseline (T3), after fluid administration (T4), and 20 min post-infusion (T5). RV function parameters, including RV to LV end-diastolic area ratio (RVEDA/LVEDA), tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (RV S'), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), pulmonary acceleration time (PAT), and right myocardial performance index (RIMP)-were assessed at T1, T4, and T5. Only fluid-responsive patients were evaluated beyond T3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T1, robust multilinear regression including all patients identified RVEDA/LVEDA (β = 10.38; p < 0.001), RIMP (β = - 6.54; p = 0.002), and RV S' (β = - 0.60; p = 0.002) as significant determinants of squared PVPI. In all patients, repeated measures correlation between Pmsa and PVPI was strong across T1-to-T3 (ρ = 0.785; p < 0.001), increasing from a non-significant correlation at T1 (ρ = 0.215; p = 0.115). Generalized estimating equations conducted only in fluid-responsive patients across T1, T4, and T5 identified Pmsa (β = 4.19; p < 0.001), RV S' (β = - 5.84; p < 0.001), RVEDA/LVEDA (β = 34.85; p = 0.018), and RIMP (β = - 35.28; p = 0.039) as significant determinants of PVPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RV function and Pmsa are key determinants of PVPI. Their combined assessment may support an individualized congestion management by guiding interventions toward volume status, RV function, or both. Trial registration Primary Trial Registration: NCT06440772. Registered 30 May 2024. Retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01498-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The portal vein pulsatility index (PVPI) reflects systemic congestion and is influenced by both volume status and right ventricular (RV) function. The mean systemic filling pressure analogue (Pmsa), derived from a mathematical model, estimates the interaction between stressed blood volume and systemic vascular compliance, serving as surrogate marker of volume status. This post-hoc analysis of an observational trial investigates the combined role of Pmsa and RV function as determinants of PVPI using echocardiography. Fifty-five mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory failure were included within 6 h of ICU admission following elective open-heart surgery. Fluid-tolerant patients (PVPI < 50%) underwent a passive leg raising (PLR) test; fluid-responsive patients subsequently received 7 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate. PVPI and Pmsa were measured at five timepoints: baseline (T1), after PLR (T2), upon returning to baseline (T3), after fluid administration (T4), and 20 min post-infusion (T5). RV function parameters, including RV to LV end-diastolic area ratio (RVEDA/LVEDA), tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (RV S'), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), pulmonary acceleration time (PAT), and right myocardial performance index (RIMP)-were assessed at T1, T4, and T5. Only fluid-responsive patients were evaluated beyond T3.

Results: At T1, robust multilinear regression including all patients identified RVEDA/LVEDA (β = 10.38; p < 0.001), RIMP (β = - 6.54; p = 0.002), and RV S' (β = - 0.60; p = 0.002) as significant determinants of squared PVPI. In all patients, repeated measures correlation between Pmsa and PVPI was strong across T1-to-T3 (ρ = 0.785; p < 0.001), increasing from a non-significant correlation at T1 (ρ = 0.215; p = 0.115). Generalized estimating equations conducted only in fluid-responsive patients across T1, T4, and T5 identified Pmsa (β = 4.19; p < 0.001), RV S' (β = - 5.84; p < 0.001), RVEDA/LVEDA (β = 34.85; p = 0.018), and RIMP (β = - 35.28; p = 0.039) as significant determinants of PVPI.

Conclusion: RV function and Pmsa are key determinants of PVPI. Their combined assessment may support an individualized congestion management by guiding interventions toward volume status, RV function, or both. Trial registration Primary Trial Registration: NCT06440772. Registered 30 May 2024. Retrospectively registered.

解码门静脉搏动:一项前瞻性观察性试验事后分析中的血流动力学决定因素。
背景:门静脉搏动指数(PVPI)反映全身充血,并受容积状态和右心室功能的影响。平均全身充盈压力模拟(Pmsa),源自数学模型,估计应激血容量和全身血管顺应性之间的相互作用,作为容量状态的替代标记。这项观察性试验的事后分析研究了Pmsa和RV功能作为PVPI决定因素的联合作用,使用超声心动图。55例机械通气的循环衰竭患者在择期心脏直视手术后6小时内进入ICU。结果:在T1时,鲁棒多元线性回归包括所有确定的RVEDA/LVEDA患者(β = 10.38;结论:RV功能和Pmsa是PVPI的关键决定因素。他们的综合评估可以支持个体化的拥堵管理,通过引导干预措施针对容积状态,RV功能,或两者兼而有之。初步试验注册:NCT06440772。注册于2024年5月30日。回顾注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信