J. Trainor , M.D. Eaton , J. Kópházi , S.G. Wilson , C. Latimer , L. Smith , D. Baker , I. Jordan
{"title":"NURBS-enhanced finite element spatial discretisation methods for the steady-state multigroup neutron diffusion equation","authors":"J. Trainor , M.D. Eaton , J. Kópházi , S.G. Wilson , C. Latimer , L. Smith , D. Baker , I. Jordan","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The NURBS-enhanced finite element method (NEFEM) is a recent innovation in spatial discretisation methods. The NEFEM combines the conventional FEM with computer-aided geometric design (CAGD) boundary representation (B-rep) approaches based upon Non-Uniform Rational B-spline (NURBS) geometrical representations of the computational domain. The aim of the NEFEM is to streamline the CAGD to computer-aided engineering (CAE) modelling and simulation (M&S) pipeline and provide improved geometrical representations of the underlying curvilinear geometry in nuclear reactor physics and reactor shielding simulations. This eliminates the requirement for local modifications to the underlying computational mesh to preserve the surface areas and volumes of curvilinear geometrical features within the computational domain. Such local mesh modifications are required, within conventional isoparametric Lagrangian FEM approaches, to preserve fissile mass and neutron leakage within curvilinear geometrical and computational domains.</div><div>This paper presents the application of the NEFEM to the multigroup neutron diffusion equation (NDE) for three nuclear reactor physics benchmark verification test cases. A further method of manufactured solution (MMS) benchmark verification test case is used to establish the order of convergence of the NEFEM compared to the FEM for both linear and quadratic elements. In addition, an analytical Wigner–Seitz pincell problem is used to further investigate the accuracy of the NEFEM. The results from these benchmark verification test cases demonstrate that the NEFEM yields improved numerical accuracy compared to the conventional FEM. This improved numerical accuracy is primarily achieved through the improved geometrical representation of curvilinear geometries. While the NURBS-enhancement of elements necessitates a small increase to the pre-processing time associated with the method, the increased accuracy of the NEFEM allows it to achieve competitive computational solution times compared to the standard Lagrangian FEM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 111601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925004189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The NURBS-enhanced finite element method (NEFEM) is a recent innovation in spatial discretisation methods. The NEFEM combines the conventional FEM with computer-aided geometric design (CAGD) boundary representation (B-rep) approaches based upon Non-Uniform Rational B-spline (NURBS) geometrical representations of the computational domain. The aim of the NEFEM is to streamline the CAGD to computer-aided engineering (CAE) modelling and simulation (M&S) pipeline and provide improved geometrical representations of the underlying curvilinear geometry in nuclear reactor physics and reactor shielding simulations. This eliminates the requirement for local modifications to the underlying computational mesh to preserve the surface areas and volumes of curvilinear geometrical features within the computational domain. Such local mesh modifications are required, within conventional isoparametric Lagrangian FEM approaches, to preserve fissile mass and neutron leakage within curvilinear geometrical and computational domains.
This paper presents the application of the NEFEM to the multigroup neutron diffusion equation (NDE) for three nuclear reactor physics benchmark verification test cases. A further method of manufactured solution (MMS) benchmark verification test case is used to establish the order of convergence of the NEFEM compared to the FEM for both linear and quadratic elements. In addition, an analytical Wigner–Seitz pincell problem is used to further investigate the accuracy of the NEFEM. The results from these benchmark verification test cases demonstrate that the NEFEM yields improved numerical accuracy compared to the conventional FEM. This improved numerical accuracy is primarily achieved through the improved geometrical representation of curvilinear geometries. While the NURBS-enhancement of elements necessitates a small increase to the pre-processing time associated with the method, the increased accuracy of the NEFEM allows it to achieve competitive computational solution times compared to the standard Lagrangian FEM.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.