A Qualitative Analysis of Choice-Driving Factors for Emergency Department Utilization Among Medicare Advantage Patients in Idaho.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hillary E Swann-Thomsen, Alicia Young, Max Hobbs, Hilary Flint, Dan Anderson
{"title":"A Qualitative Analysis of Choice-Driving Factors for Emergency Department Utilization Among Medicare Advantage Patients in Idaho.","authors":"Hillary E Swann-Thomsen, Alicia Young, Max Hobbs, Hilary Flint, Dan Anderson","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) utilization among Medicare Advantage patients has been a growing concern. Many patients opt for ED visits, which can lead to overcrowding and increased healthcare costs. Understanding the underlying reasons for this preference is crucial for developing strategies to optimize healthcare delivery and reduce unnecessary ED visits.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current project aimed to understand the reasons Medicare Advantage patients choose to seek care in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed interviews to understand drivers behind their choice to seek care in the ED. The responses were analyzed using generative AI to identify themes shaping patient decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that most ED visits occurred during hours when clinics were open, with injury and trauma-related visits being the most common reasons. The decision to visit the ED was often self-initiated, influenced by friends and family, or guided by healthcare professionals. Many patients used healthcare-related technology, but indicated challenges related to navigating technology. Patients preferred to seek care from their primary care provider (PCP) and specified that their PCP was their first point of contact for nonemergency issues. Patients' decisions on where and when to seek healthcare services were influenced by factors such as preference for a specific health system, insurance coverage, location and accessibility, and experiences with certain facilities or services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The project provides insights into the reasons for avoidable ED visits and could be useful in developing strategies to reduce avoidable ED visits and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) utilization among Medicare Advantage patients has been a growing concern. Many patients opt for ED visits, which can lead to overcrowding and increased healthcare costs. Understanding the underlying reasons for this preference is crucial for developing strategies to optimize healthcare delivery and reduce unnecessary ED visits.

Purpose: The current project aimed to understand the reasons Medicare Advantage patients choose to seek care in the ED setting.

Methods: Patients completed interviews to understand drivers behind their choice to seek care in the ED. The responses were analyzed using generative AI to identify themes shaping patient decisions.

Results: Results showed that most ED visits occurred during hours when clinics were open, with injury and trauma-related visits being the most common reasons. The decision to visit the ED was often self-initiated, influenced by friends and family, or guided by healthcare professionals. Many patients used healthcare-related technology, but indicated challenges related to navigating technology. Patients preferred to seek care from their primary care provider (PCP) and specified that their PCP was their first point of contact for nonemergency issues. Patients' decisions on where and when to seek healthcare services were influenced by factors such as preference for a specific health system, insurance coverage, location and accessibility, and experiences with certain facilities or services.

Conclusions: The project provides insights into the reasons for avoidable ED visits and could be useful in developing strategies to reduce avoidable ED visits and improve patient care.

爱达荷州医保优势患者急诊科使用选择驱动因素的定性分析
背景:急诊科(ED)的利用在医疗保险优势患者已日益受到关注。许多患者选择急诊科就诊,这可能导致人满为患,增加医疗费用。了解这种偏好的潜在原因对于制定优化医疗服务和减少不必要的急诊科就诊的策略至关重要。目的:本项目旨在了解享受医疗保险优惠的患者选择在急诊科就诊的原因。方法:患者完成访谈,以了解他们选择在急诊科寻求治疗背后的驱动因素。使用生成式人工智能分析响应,以确定影响患者决策的主题。结果:结果显示,大多数急诊科就诊发生在诊所开放的时间,受伤和创伤相关的就诊是最常见的原因。去急诊科的决定往往是自己发起的,受到朋友和家人的影响,或在医疗保健专业人员的指导下。许多患者使用与医疗保健相关的技术,但指出了与导航技术相关的挑战。患者更倾向于向他们的初级保健提供者(PCP)寻求护理,并指定他们的初级保健提供者是他们在非紧急问题上的第一联络点。患者在何时何地寻求医疗服务的决定受到以下因素的影响:对特定医疗系统的偏好、保险范围、位置和可及性,以及使用某些设施或服务的经验。结论:该项目为可避免急诊科就诊的原因提供了见解,并可用于制定减少可避免急诊科就诊和改善患者护理的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信