Uncovering ethical biases in publicly available fetal ultrasound datasets

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Chiara Fiorentino, Sara Moccia, Mariachiara Di Cosmo, Emanuele Frontoni, Benedetta Giovanola, Simona Tiribelli
{"title":"Uncovering ethical biases in publicly available fetal ultrasound datasets","authors":"Maria Chiara Fiorentino, Sara Moccia, Mariachiara Di Cosmo, Emanuele Frontoni, Benedetta Giovanola, Simona Tiribelli","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01739-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explore biases present in publicly available fetal ultrasound (US) imaging datasets, currently at the disposal of researchers to train deep learning (DL) algorithms for prenatal diagnostics. As DL increasingly permeates the field of medical imaging, the urgency to critically evaluate the fairness of benchmark public datasets used to train them grows. Our thorough investigation reveals a multifaceted bias problem, encompassing issues such as lack of demographic representativeness, limited diversity in clinical conditions depicted, and variability in US technology used across datasets. We argue that these biases may significantly influence DL model performance, which may lead to inequities in healthcare outcomes. To address these challenges, we recommend a multilayered approach. This includes promoting practices that ensure data inclusivity, such as diversifying data sources and populations, and refining model strategies to better account for population variances. These steps will enhance the trustworthiness of DL algorithms in fetal US analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01739-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explore biases present in publicly available fetal ultrasound (US) imaging datasets, currently at the disposal of researchers to train deep learning (DL) algorithms for prenatal diagnostics. As DL increasingly permeates the field of medical imaging, the urgency to critically evaluate the fairness of benchmark public datasets used to train them grows. Our thorough investigation reveals a multifaceted bias problem, encompassing issues such as lack of demographic representativeness, limited diversity in clinical conditions depicted, and variability in US technology used across datasets. We argue that these biases may significantly influence DL model performance, which may lead to inequities in healthcare outcomes. To address these challenges, we recommend a multilayered approach. This includes promoting practices that ensure data inclusivity, such as diversifying data sources and populations, and refining model strategies to better account for population variances. These steps will enhance the trustworthiness of DL algorithms in fetal US analysis.

Abstract Image

揭露公开胎儿超声数据集的伦理偏见
我们探讨了公开可用的胎儿超声(US)成像数据集中存在的偏见,目前研究人员可以训练深度学习(DL)算法用于产前诊断。随着深度学习越来越多地渗透到医学成像领域,批判性地评估用于训练它们的基准公共数据集的公平性的紧迫性越来越大。我们的彻底调查揭示了一个多方面的偏见问题,包括缺乏人口统计学代表性,所描述的临床条件多样性有限,以及跨数据集使用的美国技术的可变性等问题。我们认为,这些偏差可能显著影响深度学习模型的性能,这可能导致医疗保健结果的不公平。为了应对这些挑战,我们建议采用多层方法。这包括促进确保数据包容性的做法,例如使数据源和人口多样化,以及改进模型策略以更好地解释人口差异。这些步骤将提高DL算法在胎儿超声分析中的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信