Seismic Displacement Analysis of Jointed Rock Slopes Considering Topographic Amplification and Joint Strength Degradation

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Hui Shen, Xinping Li, Tingting Liu, Yaqun Liu, Haibo Li, Wenxu Huang
{"title":"Seismic Displacement Analysis of Jointed Rock Slopes Considering Topographic Amplification and Joint Strength Degradation","authors":"Hui Shen, Xinping Li, Tingting Liu, Yaqun Liu, Haibo Li, Wenxu Huang","doi":"10.1002/nag.4017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately estimating seismically induced permanent displacement is essential for evaluating the dynamic stability of rock slopes. This study presents an enhanced model aimed at better evaluating the seismic displacement of jointed rock slopes by incorporating topographic amplification effects and the dynamic strength degradation of joints. A pseudodynamic analysis was utilized to model the amplified seismic force acting on the slope. The dynamic degradation law of the joint strength was characterized through the cyclic shear tests and integrated into the proposed model. Seismic displacement for the jointed slopes was obtained by solving the equations of motion, with sliding governed by the Mohr–Coulomb joint strength criterion. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated by comparing its results with those derived from the Newmark method and existing methods. Subsequently, the impact of amplified ground motions and joint strength degradation dependent on displacement and velocity on seismic displacement of jointed rock slopes was examined numerically. The results indicate that the proposed model can directly estimate reasonable seismic displacements of jointed slopes without explicitly specifying the yield acceleration, and it produces more conservative displacements compared to the Newmark method. Findings also emphasize that the amplified ground motion and the dynamic shear strength of joints significantly increase the seismic displacements, implying that neglecting them may lead to an underestimation of the permanent displacement of slopes. This study offers an alternative approach for estimating the permanent displacement of jointed rock slopes, which may provide valuable insights for the seismic design of slope engineering.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.4017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately estimating seismically induced permanent displacement is essential for evaluating the dynamic stability of rock slopes. This study presents an enhanced model aimed at better evaluating the seismic displacement of jointed rock slopes by incorporating topographic amplification effects and the dynamic strength degradation of joints. A pseudodynamic analysis was utilized to model the amplified seismic force acting on the slope. The dynamic degradation law of the joint strength was characterized through the cyclic shear tests and integrated into the proposed model. Seismic displacement for the jointed slopes was obtained by solving the equations of motion, with sliding governed by the Mohr–Coulomb joint strength criterion. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated by comparing its results with those derived from the Newmark method and existing methods. Subsequently, the impact of amplified ground motions and joint strength degradation dependent on displacement and velocity on seismic displacement of jointed rock slopes was examined numerically. The results indicate that the proposed model can directly estimate reasonable seismic displacements of jointed slopes without explicitly specifying the yield acceleration, and it produces more conservative displacements compared to the Newmark method. Findings also emphasize that the amplified ground motion and the dynamic shear strength of joints significantly increase the seismic displacements, implying that neglecting them may lead to an underestimation of the permanent displacement of slopes. This study offers an alternative approach for estimating the permanent displacement of jointed rock slopes, which may provide valuable insights for the seismic design of slope engineering.
考虑地形放大和节理强度退化的节理岩质边坡地震位移分析
准确估计地震诱发的永久位移是评价岩质边坡动力稳定性的关键。为了更好地评价节理岩质边坡的地震位移,本研究提出了一个考虑地形放大效应和节理动强度退化的增强模型。利用拟动力分析模拟了作用在边坡上的放大地震力。通过循环剪切试验表征了节理强度的动态退化规律,并将其整合到该模型中。通过求解运动方程得到节理边坡的地震位移,滑移由Mohr-Coulomb节理强度准则控制。通过与Newmark方法和现有方法的预测结果进行比较,评价了预测模型的性能。在此基础上,数值分析了地震动放大和节理强度随位移和速度的退化对节理岩质边坡地震位移的影响。结果表明,该模型可以在不明确指定屈服加速度的情况下直接估计出节理边坡的合理地震位移,并且与Newmark方法相比,该模型产生的位移更为保守。研究结果还强调,放大的地面运动和节理的动抗剪强度显著增加了地震位移,这意味着忽略它们可能会导致对边坡永久位移的低估。该研究为节理岩质边坡的永久位移估计提供了一种新的方法,为边坡工程的抗震设计提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信