Technological Devices for Nutritional Counseling in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease.

IF 3.2
Fabiola Martín-Del-Campo, Andrea Arriaga-Verduzco, Ari Cisneros-Hernández, Norma García-Galindo, Francisco Gerardo Yanowsky-Escatell, Leonardo Pazarín-Villaseñor, Jorge Andrade-Sierra
{"title":"Technological Devices for Nutritional Counseling in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Fabiola Martín-Del-Campo, Andrea Arriaga-Verduzco, Ari Cisneros-Hernández, Norma García-Galindo, Francisco Gerardo Yanowsky-Escatell, Leonardo Pazarín-Villaseñor, Jorge Andrade-Sierra","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored the access, use, and acceptance of technological devices for nutritional counseling in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in a low socioeconomic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 80 adult patients with DKD from an underserved population, attending the nephrology service of a tertiary-care teaching hospital were included. All patients had a clinical, nutritional, and biochemical evaluation; a direct questionnaire was applied to evaluate access and use of technological devices for nutritional counseling as well as their acceptance (knowledge and perception about benefits, barriers, needs, and easy to use).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven percent of patients had access to a smartphone, whereas 20% and 6% to a computer and tablet, respectively; 40% use technological devices for health/nutrition search. Knowledge (1 [1-2]) and barriers (1.4 [1-1.8]) scores were low; scores for benefits (3.7 [3-4]), needs (4.4 [3.7-5]), and easy to use (4.2 [3.7-4.5]) were high. Higher perceptions of the benefits, needs, and willingness to receive nutritional counseling via telemedicine and lower barriers perception were associated with higher easy to use score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite advanced age and low educational level, patients had good access to smartphones and perceived their possible benefits and need for nutritional counseling. Regardless of low knowledge, perception of barriers was very low. Telemedicine via smartphones may be a good option to improve nutritional knowledge and skills of patients with DKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":520689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2025.05.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study explored the access, use, and acceptance of technological devices for nutritional counseling in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in a low socioeconomic setting.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 80 adult patients with DKD from an underserved population, attending the nephrology service of a tertiary-care teaching hospital were included. All patients had a clinical, nutritional, and biochemical evaluation; a direct questionnaire was applied to evaluate access and use of technological devices for nutritional counseling as well as their acceptance (knowledge and perception about benefits, barriers, needs, and easy to use).

Results: Eighty-seven percent of patients had access to a smartphone, whereas 20% and 6% to a computer and tablet, respectively; 40% use technological devices for health/nutrition search. Knowledge (1 [1-2]) and barriers (1.4 [1-1.8]) scores were low; scores for benefits (3.7 [3-4]), needs (4.4 [3.7-5]), and easy to use (4.2 [3.7-4.5]) were high. Higher perceptions of the benefits, needs, and willingness to receive nutritional counseling via telemedicine and lower barriers perception were associated with higher easy to use score.

Conclusions: Despite advanced age and low educational level, patients had good access to smartphones and perceived their possible benefits and need for nutritional counseling. Regardless of low knowledge, perception of barriers was very low. Telemedicine via smartphones may be a good option to improve nutritional knowledge and skills of patients with DKD.

糖尿病肾病患者营养咨询的技术设备。
目的:本研究探讨低社会经济背景下糖尿病肾病(DKD)患者营养咨询技术设备的获取、使用和接受情况。方法:横断面研究;80名成年DKD患者来自服务不足的人群,在一家三级护理教学医院的肾病科就诊。所有患者均进行临床、营养和生化评价;采用了一份直接问卷来评估营养咨询技术设备的获取和使用情况及其接受程度(对益处、障碍、需求和使用方便的了解和认识)。结果:87%的患者有智能手机,20%和6%的患者分别有电脑和平板电脑;40%的人使用技术设备进行健康/营养搜索。知识[1(1-2)]和障碍[1.4(1-1.8)]得分较低;效益评分[3.7(3-4)]、需求评分[4.4(3.7-5)]、使用方便评分[4.2(3.7-4.5)]较高。对通过远程医疗接受营养咨询的益处、需求和意愿的较高认知,以及较低的认知障碍,与较高的易用性得分相关。结论:尽管患者年龄较大,受教育程度较低,但他们对智能手机有良好的了解,并意识到智能手机可能带来的好处和对营养咨询的需求。除了低知识外,对障碍的认知也很低。通过智能手机进行远程医疗可能是提高DKD患者营养知识和技能的一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信