Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure on atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6
Eduardo Dan Itaya, Caique M P Ternes, Timothy Maher, Amanda A D Fernandes, Ana Vitoria Rocha, Catherine Wippel, André Rivera, Andrew H Locke, Andre d'Avila
{"title":"Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure on atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eduardo Dan Itaya, Caique M P Ternes, Timothy Maher, Amanda A D Fernandes, Ana Vitoria Rocha, Catherine Wippel, André Rivera, Andrew H Locke, Andre d'Avila","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02063-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation (CA) in patients with OSA remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing CPAP vs. no CPAP use for OSA treatment and recurrence of AF following CA. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1 RCT and 10 observational studies with 1536 patients with OSA who underwent CA for AF, of whom 53% used CPAP. Mean follow-up ranged from 3 to 42 months. In the pooled analysis, AF recurrence (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.23-0.58; p < 0.01) was significantly lower in patients treated with CPAP compared with no CPAP. In the subgroup analysis, the AF recurrence in the CPAP group was also significantly lower after restricting to studies with longer follow-up periods ≥ 18 months (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.18-0.46; p < 0.01) and in studies with a greater proportion of persistent AF (≥ 50%) (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.61; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with OSA and AF who underwent CA, CPAP use was associated with reduced AF recurrence compared to no CPAP use. Most of the data available is derived from observational studies, and the only RCT showed no difference between groups. Thus, results should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":"1749-1759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02063-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation (CA) in patients with OSA remains unclear.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing CPAP vs. no CPAP use for OSA treatment and recurrence of AF following CA. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

Results: We included 1 RCT and 10 observational studies with 1536 patients with OSA who underwent CA for AF, of whom 53% used CPAP. Mean follow-up ranged from 3 to 42 months. In the pooled analysis, AF recurrence (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.23-0.58; p < 0.01) was significantly lower in patients treated with CPAP compared with no CPAP. In the subgroup analysis, the AF recurrence in the CPAP group was also significantly lower after restricting to studies with longer follow-up periods ≥ 18 months (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.18-0.46; p < 0.01) and in studies with a greater proportion of persistent AF (≥ 50%) (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.61; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: In patients with OSA and AF who underwent CA, CPAP use was associated with reduced AF recurrence compared to no CPAP use. Most of the data available is derived from observational studies, and the only RCT showed no difference between groups. Thus, results should be interpreted with caution.

持续气道正压治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者导管消融后房颤复发的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与心房颤动(AF)的风险增加有关。然而,持续气道正压通气(CPAP)对OSA患者导管消融(CA)后房颤复发的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究,比较使用CPAP与不使用CPAP治疗OSA和CA后AF复发的差异。结果:我们纳入了1项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究,共纳入1536例OSA患者,其中53%使用了CPAP。平均随访时间为3 ~ 42个月。在合并分析中,AF复发率(OR 0.37;95% ci 0.23-0.58;结论:在接受CA的OSA和AF患者中,与未使用CPAP相比,使用CPAP可减少AF复发。大多数可用的数据来自观察性研究,唯一的随机对照试验显示各组之间没有差异。因此,对结果的解释应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信