{"title":"Crestal bone loss in partially grafted immediate dental implants with and without use of static magnetic field: An <i>in vivo</i> study.","authors":"Akanksha Yadav, Lakshya Kumar, Uma Shanker Pal, Ranjit Patil, Madan Lal Brahm Bhatt, Aditi Verma","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_153_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of dental implants is a successful method in modern dentistry for replacing missing teeth. To cater to patients' desire for shorter treatment times, clinicians have explored early or immediate loading of implants shortly after their placement. Implant stability during this period is influenced by multiple factors, including bone density, bone mechanical properties, implant design, edentulous site complications, and surgical technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether static magnetic fields (SMFs), generated using safer magnets, can enhance osseointegration, and mitigate crestal bone loss in immediately placed dental implants post-grafting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involves assessing crestal bone loss in two groups of immediately placed dental implants-one group exposed to an SMF and another group without such exposure. The SMF is generated by safer magnets. Implant stability and crestal bone loss are evaluated as the primary outcomes. The evaluation is conducted at baseline, as well as at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after implant placement. Three different examiners perform the measurements to enhance accuracy and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study's findings provided insights into whether the application of SMFs impacted crestal bone loss during 1 year of follow-up. Comparison between the exposed and nonexposed groups shed light on the potential benefits of utilizing SMFs for enhancing osseointegration and minimizing crestal bone loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study's investigation into the effects of SMFs on immediately placed dental implants holds promise for advancing our understanding of techniques to accelerate osseointegration and reduce crestal bone loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_153_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of dental implants is a successful method in modern dentistry for replacing missing teeth. To cater to patients' desire for shorter treatment times, clinicians have explored early or immediate loading of implants shortly after their placement. Implant stability during this period is influenced by multiple factors, including bone density, bone mechanical properties, implant design, edentulous site complications, and surgical technique.
Objective: This study aims to investigate whether static magnetic fields (SMFs), generated using safer magnets, can enhance osseointegration, and mitigate crestal bone loss in immediately placed dental implants post-grafting.
Materials and methods: The study involves assessing crestal bone loss in two groups of immediately placed dental implants-one group exposed to an SMF and another group without such exposure. The SMF is generated by safer magnets. Implant stability and crestal bone loss are evaluated as the primary outcomes. The evaluation is conducted at baseline, as well as at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after implant placement. Three different examiners perform the measurements to enhance accuracy and reliability.
Results: The study's findings provided insights into whether the application of SMFs impacted crestal bone loss during 1 year of follow-up. Comparison between the exposed and nonexposed groups shed light on the potential benefits of utilizing SMFs for enhancing osseointegration and minimizing crestal bone loss.
Conclusion: This study's investigation into the effects of SMFs on immediately placed dental implants holds promise for advancing our understanding of techniques to accelerate osseointegration and reduce crestal bone loss.