Comparative evaluation of chitosan- and hydrocolloid-based dressing for the management of abrasions over the maxillofacial region.

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_126_22

Prachur Malhotra, Saurabh Chandalia, Mrudula Mulay, Deep Shah, Kreena Shah, Kaustuv Kant

{"title":"Comparative evaluation of chitosan- and hydrocolloid-based dressing for the management of abrasions over the maxillofacial region.","authors":"Prachur Malhotra, Saurabh Chandalia, Mrudula Mulay, Deep Shah, Kreena Shah, Kaustuv Kant","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_126_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the management of abrasions of the maxillofacial region by chitosan and hydrocolloid dressing materials.Materials and methods: The study was carried out by the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, KMSDCH. The sample size of the study was 70 patients which were divided into two groups: Group A was the Chitosan group and Group B was Hydrocolloid Dressing. The abrasion site was cleaned, and the dressing was given. The parameters of assessment were the rate of wound healing and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment.Results: The rates of wound healing for chitosan and hydrocolloid were 9 days and 14 days, respectively. The Bates-Jensen Scores for Wound Assessment for chitosan and hydrocolloid were similar.Conclusion: The chitosan dressing showed a faster rate of wound healing than hydrocolloid-based dressing.","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_126_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the management of abrasions of the maxillofacial region by chitosan and hydrocolloid dressing materials.

Materials and methods: The study was carried out by the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, KMSDCH. The sample size of the study was 70 patients which were divided into two groups: Group A was the Chitosan group and Group B was Hydrocolloid Dressing. The abrasion site was cleaned, and the dressing was given. The parameters of assessment were the rate of wound healing and Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment.

Results: The rates of wound healing for chitosan and hydrocolloid were 9 days and 14 days, respectively. The Bates-Jensen Scores for Wound Assessment for chitosan and hydrocolloid were similar.

Conclusion: The chitosan dressing showed a faster rate of wound healing than hydrocolloid-based dressing.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

壳聚糖与水胶体敷料治疗颌面部磨耗的比较评价。

目的：评价和比较壳聚糖和水胶体敷料对颌面部磨损的治疗效果。材料和方法：本研究由kmssdch颌面外科进行。本研究的样本量为70例，分为两组：A组为壳聚糖组，B组为水胶体敷料组。清洗磨损部位，并给予敷料。评估参数为创面愈合率和Bates-Jensen创面评分。结果：壳聚糖和水胶体的创面愈合时间分别为9 d和14 d。壳聚糖和水胶体伤口评估的Bates-Jensen评分相似。结论：壳聚糖敷料比水胶体敷料愈合速度快。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

National journal of maxillofacial surgery

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量