Closing the Communication Gap: Assessing the Alignment Between UME and GME Competencies.

Anita M Wilson, Katherine Berg, Aaron Douglas, John Caruso, Gretchen Diemer, Kathleen Day, Rosemary Frasso, Steven K Herrine, David Abraham
{"title":"Closing the Communication Gap: Assessing the Alignment Between UME and GME Competencies.","authors":"Anita M Wilson, Katherine Berg, Aaron Douglas, John Caruso, Gretchen Diemer, Kathleen Day, Rosemary Frasso, Steven K Herrine, David Abraham","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study identified a method for assessing the alignment between undergraduate medical education program learning objectives and graduate medical education program competencies. Using a modified Delphi approach in which the number of rounds (3) and consensus (70% agreement) were determined a priori, the study sought to align objectives and competency measures between the programs. The authors invited panelists from Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University to independently respond to a questionnaire via an email invitation. In the questionnaire, panelists made 46 decisions about the alignment between the undergraduate medical education program learning objectives and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Harmonized Milestones subcompetencies. Approximately, 57% (26/46) of the decisions reached a consensus that there was an alignment between the objectives and the subcompetencies. By aligning the objective and subcompetencies, this study provided a first step toward closing the gap in the communication of student competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"235-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study identified a method for assessing the alignment between undergraduate medical education program learning objectives and graduate medical education program competencies. Using a modified Delphi approach in which the number of rounds (3) and consensus (70% agreement) were determined a priori, the study sought to align objectives and competency measures between the programs. The authors invited panelists from Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University to independently respond to a questionnaire via an email invitation. In the questionnaire, panelists made 46 decisions about the alignment between the undergraduate medical education program learning objectives and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Harmonized Milestones subcompetencies. Approximately, 57% (26/46) of the decisions reached a consensus that there was an alignment between the objectives and the subcompetencies. By aligning the objective and subcompetencies, this study provided a first step toward closing the gap in the communication of student competencies.

缩小沟通差距:评估UME和GME能力之间的一致性。
本研究确定了一种评估本科医学教育计划学习目标与研究生医学教育计划能力之间一致性的方法。采用改进的德尔菲方法,其中轮数(3)和共识(70%的同意)是先验确定的,该研究试图在项目之间调整目标和能力测量。作者邀请托马斯·杰斐逊大学西德尼·基梅尔医学院的小组成员通过电子邮件邀请独立回答一份问卷。在问卷调查中,小组成员就本科医学教育计划学习目标与研究生医学教育协调里程碑子能力认证委员会之间的一致性做出了46项决定。大约57%(26/46)的决策达成共识,即目标和子能力之间存在一致性。通过调整目标和子能力,本研究为缩小学生能力沟通的差距提供了第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信