Experimental wounding models of different bullet types and diameters on extremities.

Ilknur Arslan, Gökhan İbrahim Öğünç, Özhan Pazarcı, Ahmet Hilal, Mehmet Eryılmaz
{"title":"Experimental wounding models of different bullet types and diameters on extremities.","authors":"Ilknur Arslan, Gökhan İbrahim Öğünç, Özhan Pazarcı, Ahmet Hilal, Mehmet Eryılmaz","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.12472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gunshot wounds are the second leading cause of life-threatening injuries and frequently affect the extremities, accounting for 63% of combat-related cases over the past 50 years. Although extremity injuries have lower mortality rates, they still require urgent treatment to reduce complications. Wound ballistics studies often use tissue surrogates like ballistic wax and gelatin, which have limitations due to their dissimilarity to living tissues. There is insufficient data on the effects of gunshots on extremities composed of bone and muscle, which differ in resistance and elasticity. This study aims to analyze the damage caused by commonly used ammunition in living tissue and provide healthcare professionals with critical insights to improve emergency care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved six Adana-breed sheep, aged 3-4 years, previously used in another study and showing no vital signs. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. Test shots were conducted using 9×19 mm (M822), 5.56×45 mm (SS109), and 7.62×51 mm (M80) bullets from a distance of 300 cm, targeting the front legs of sheep positioned laterally. Following the shots, entry and exit wounds were photographed, and anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of the extremities were taken for analysis. The aim was to examine the effects of different types of ammunition on extremities and provide insights into the characteristics of gunshot wounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first test group (subjects A and B), X-ray imaging revealed joint integrity loss, multi-part fractures, and cavitation in the soft tissue, with bone fragments distributed along the exit trajectory. No bullet fragments were found within the wound cavity. The M822 bullet produced a typical entry wound and a smaller, more defined exit wound. In the second group (subjects C and D), SS109 bullets caused fragmentation of bone, muscle, tendon, and skin. Bullet fragments created a shrapnel-like effect. The exit wounds were larger and had irregular edges. In the third group (subjects E and F), M80 bullets caused extensive tissue disruption due to their high kinetic energy. The resulting exit wounds were wide and irregular.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that M80 bullets caused the most severe bone and soft tissue damage compared to M822 and SS109 bullets, primarily due to their higher kinetic energy density and structural characteristics. Unlike prior research using synthetic tissue models, this study demonstrates the real-tissue effects of different ammunition types. Radiologists, forensic medicine experts, and other healthcare professionals should be aware that firearm injuries vary depending on the bullet's characteristics. Applying this understanding can lead to appropriate diagnoses and improved treatment strategies, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 6","pages":"516-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.12472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gunshot wounds are the second leading cause of life-threatening injuries and frequently affect the extremities, accounting for 63% of combat-related cases over the past 50 years. Although extremity injuries have lower mortality rates, they still require urgent treatment to reduce complications. Wound ballistics studies often use tissue surrogates like ballistic wax and gelatin, which have limitations due to their dissimilarity to living tissues. There is insufficient data on the effects of gunshots on extremities composed of bone and muscle, which differ in resistance and elasticity. This study aims to analyze the damage caused by commonly used ammunition in living tissue and provide healthcare professionals with critical insights to improve emergency care.

Methods: The study involved six Adana-breed sheep, aged 3-4 years, previously used in another study and showing no vital signs. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. Test shots were conducted using 9×19 mm (M822), 5.56×45 mm (SS109), and 7.62×51 mm (M80) bullets from a distance of 300 cm, targeting the front legs of sheep positioned laterally. Following the shots, entry and exit wounds were photographed, and anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of the extremities were taken for analysis. The aim was to examine the effects of different types of ammunition on extremities and provide insights into the characteristics of gunshot wounds.

Results: In the first test group (subjects A and B), X-ray imaging revealed joint integrity loss, multi-part fractures, and cavitation in the soft tissue, with bone fragments distributed along the exit trajectory. No bullet fragments were found within the wound cavity. The M822 bullet produced a typical entry wound and a smaller, more defined exit wound. In the second group (subjects C and D), SS109 bullets caused fragmentation of bone, muscle, tendon, and skin. Bullet fragments created a shrapnel-like effect. The exit wounds were larger and had irregular edges. In the third group (subjects E and F), M80 bullets caused extensive tissue disruption due to their high kinetic energy. The resulting exit wounds were wide and irregular.

Conclusion: This study found that M80 bullets caused the most severe bone and soft tissue damage compared to M822 and SS109 bullets, primarily due to their higher kinetic energy density and structural characteristics. Unlike prior research using synthetic tissue models, this study demonstrates the real-tissue effects of different ammunition types. Radiologists, forensic medicine experts, and other healthcare professionals should be aware that firearm injuries vary depending on the bullet's characteristics. Applying this understanding can lead to appropriate diagnoses and improved treatment strategies, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

不同子弹类型和直径对四肢损伤的实验模型。
背景:枪伤是危及生命的伤害的第二大原因,经常影响四肢,在过去50年的战斗相关病例中占63%。尽管四肢损伤的死亡率较低,但仍需要紧急治疗以减少并发症。创伤弹道学研究经常使用组织替代物,如弹道蜡和明胶,由于它们与活体组织不同,因此具有局限性。关于枪击对骨骼和肌肉组成的四肢的影响的数据不足,骨骼和肌肉的阻力和弹性不同。本研究旨在分析活体组织中常用弹药造成的损伤,为医疗保健专业人员提供重要的见解,以改善急救护理。方法:该研究涉及6只adana品种羊,年龄3-4岁,先前用于另一项研究,无生命体征。获得了当地伦理委员会的伦理批准。试验射击使用9×19毫米(M822)、5.56×45毫米(SS109)和7.62×51毫米(M80)子弹,距离为300厘米,目标是侧向放置的羊的前腿。射击后,拍摄入、出伤口,并拍摄四肢的正位和侧位x线图像进行分析。目的是研究不同类型的弹药对四肢的影响,并提供对枪伤特征的见解。结果:第一试验组(受试者A和B) x线影像学显示关节完整性丧失,多处骨折,软组织空化,骨碎片沿退出轨迹分布。伤口腔内没有发现子弹碎片。M822子弹造成了一个典型的射入伤和一个较小但更明显的射出伤。在第二组(受试者C和D)中,SS109子弹导致骨、肌肉、肌腱和皮肤碎裂。子弹碎片产生了类似弹片的效果。出口伤口较大,边缘不规则。在第三组(受试者E和F)中,M80子弹由于其高动能造成了广泛的组织破坏。造成的出口伤口宽而不规则。结论:本研究发现,与M822和SS109子弹相比,M80子弹对骨骼和软组织的损伤最为严重,这主要是由于M80子弹具有更高的动能密度和结构特点。与先前使用合成组织模型的研究不同,本研究展示了不同弹药类型的真实组织效应。放射科医生、法医专家和其他医疗保健专业人员应该意识到,枪支造成的伤害取决于子弹的特性。应用这种认识可以导致适当的诊断和改进的治疗策略,最终提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信