Efficacy and Safety of External Therapies of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Zhen Wang, Chi Zhao, Mengmeng Li, Lili Zhang, Jieyao Diao, Yiming Wu, Tao Yang, Mingwei Shi, Yang Lei, Yu Wang, Miaoxiu Li, Yanqin Bian, Yunfeng Zhou, Hui Xu
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of External Therapies of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Zhen Wang, Chi Zhao, Mengmeng Li, Lili Zhang, Jieyao Diao, Yiming Wu, Tao Yang, Mingwei Shi, Yang Lei, Yu Wang, Miaoxiu Li, Yanqin Bian, Yunfeng Zhou, Hui Xu","doi":"10.1089/rej.2025.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of external therapies for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is supported by several guidelines and systematic reviews. However, the relative advantages and disadvantages of TCM external therapies and their mechanisms of action have not yet been confirmed in evidence-based medicine. We used network meta-analysis to rank the effectiveness and safety of TCM external therapies, screen the optimal TCM external therapies. TCM external therapies for KOA published before October 2024 were comprehensively retrieved from eight electronic databases. Using the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook, two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 and RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 68 RCTs were identified, including 6571 participants, involving 11 interventions, 4.41% of which showed a high risk of bias. The results of the network meta-analysis revealed that in terms of improving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function scores, each external therapy was better than conventional medicine. Electroacupuncture may be the most effective intervention in improving the VAS score and TNF-α level. Moxibustion resulted in the greatest improvement in WOMAC function and IL-6 levels. The most effective interventions for reducing WOMAC pain scores were the manual needle knife, followed by electroacupuncture and Tuina therapy (SUCRA = 82.9%, 79.0%, and 71.4%, respectively). Warming acupuncture dominantly increased Lysholm scores. The safety results showed that the three safest interventions were the sham intervention, Tuina therapy, and moxibustion (SUCRA = 90.6%, 83.1%, and 68.8%, respectively). Silver needle had the best comprehensive effect. Electroacupuncture has the best effect on improving pain symptoms, and moxibustion can be prioritized when functional limitations are the main symptoms. To some extent, the changes in inflammatory factors correlated with an improvement in KOA symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94189,"journal":{"name":"Rejuvenation research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rejuvenation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2025.0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of external therapies for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is supported by several guidelines and systematic reviews. However, the relative advantages and disadvantages of TCM external therapies and their mechanisms of action have not yet been confirmed in evidence-based medicine. We used network meta-analysis to rank the effectiveness and safety of TCM external therapies, screen the optimal TCM external therapies. TCM external therapies for KOA published before October 2024 were comprehensively retrieved from eight electronic databases. Using the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook, two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 and RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 68 RCTs were identified, including 6571 participants, involving 11 interventions, 4.41% of which showed a high risk of bias. The results of the network meta-analysis revealed that in terms of improving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function scores, each external therapy was better than conventional medicine. Electroacupuncture may be the most effective intervention in improving the VAS score and TNF-α level. Moxibustion resulted in the greatest improvement in WOMAC function and IL-6 levels. The most effective interventions for reducing WOMAC pain scores were the manual needle knife, followed by electroacupuncture and Tuina therapy (SUCRA = 82.9%, 79.0%, and 71.4%, respectively). Warming acupuncture dominantly increased Lysholm scores. The safety results showed that the three safest interventions were the sham intervention, Tuina therapy, and moxibustion (SUCRA = 90.6%, 83.1%, and 68.8%, respectively). Silver needle had the best comprehensive effect. Electroacupuncture has the best effect on improving pain symptoms, and moxibustion can be prioritized when functional limitations are the main symptoms. To some extent, the changes in inflammatory factors correlated with an improvement in KOA symptoms.

中药外敷治疗膝骨性关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络meta分析。
在中医(TCM)中使用外部疗法治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)得到了一些指南和系统综述的支持。然而,中医外治法的相对优劣及其作用机制在循证医学中尚未得到证实。采用网络meta分析对中药外治疗法的疗效和安全性进行排序,筛选最佳中药外治疗法。综合检索2024年10月前发表的KOA中医外治疗法,检索8个电子数据库。使用Cochrane审稿人手册,两位独立审稿人对纳入的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行研究选择、数据提取和偏倚评估。采用Stata 16.0、RevMan 5.4软件进行数据分析。共纳入68项随机对照试验,6571名受试者,涉及11项干预措施,其中4.41%存在高偏倚风险。网络荟萃分析结果显示,在改善视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)功能评分方面,每种外部疗法均优于传统药物。电针可能是改善VAS评分和TNF-α水平最有效的干预措施。艾灸对WOMAC功能和IL-6水平的改善效果最大。降低WOMAC疼痛评分最有效的干预措施是手动针刀,其次是电针和推拿治疗(SUCRA分别为82.9%、79.0%和71.4%)。温针灸显著提高Lysholm评分。安全性结果显示,最安全的3种干预措施分别是假干预、推拿和艾灸(SUCRA分别为90.6%、83.1%和68.8%)。银针综合疗效最好。电针对改善疼痛症状的效果最好,当以功能受限为主要症状时,可优先使用电针。在某种程度上,炎症因子的变化与KOA症状的改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信