Evaluating rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.
Zhu Mei, Xin-Lu Bai, Dong-Mei Huang, Qiao-Lin Zhang, Ling Yan
{"title":"Evaluating rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.","authors":"Zhu Mei, Xin-Lu Bai, Dong-Mei Huang, Qiao-Lin Zhang, Ling Yan","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to assess whether rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood culture bottles for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be used in Chinese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rapid AST was performed on each positive blood culture bottle. Categorical rapid AST results at 8 to 10 and 16 to 18 hours were compared with those from the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux). Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameter were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard M100-S34, published in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 8 to 10 hours, the overall categorical agreement for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa was 99.1%, 98.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. At 16 to 18 hours, these rates were 97.4%, 98.9%, and 99.1%, respectively. For E coli, the categorical agreement ranged from 97.2% (ceftazidime at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ampicillin and meropenem at 8-10 and 16-18 hours and ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours). The categorical agreement for K pneumoniae varied from 96.5%with ceftazidime at 8 to 10 hours to 100% with meropenem and ciprofloxacin at 16 to 18 hours. For P aeruginosa, the categorical agreement ranged from 93.7% (meropenem at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CLSI rapid AST method is reliable for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmaf018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: We sought to assess whether rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood culture bottles for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be used in Chinese hospitals.
Methods: Rapid AST was performed on each positive blood culture bottle. Categorical rapid AST results at 8 to 10 and 16 to 18 hours were compared with those from the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux). Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameter were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard M100-S34, published in 2024.
Results: At 8 to 10 hours, the overall categorical agreement for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa was 99.1%, 98.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. At 16 to 18 hours, these rates were 97.4%, 98.9%, and 99.1%, respectively. For E coli, the categorical agreement ranged from 97.2% (ceftazidime at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ampicillin and meropenem at 8-10 and 16-18 hours and ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours). The categorical agreement for K pneumoniae varied from 96.5%with ceftazidime at 8 to 10 hours to 100% with meropenem and ciprofloxacin at 16 to 18 hours. For P aeruginosa, the categorical agreement ranged from 93.7% (meropenem at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours).
Discussion: The CLSI rapid AST method is reliable for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.