Evaluating rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.

IF 1
Zhu Mei, Xin-Lu Bai, Dong-Mei Huang, Qiao-Lin Zhang, Ling Yan
{"title":"Evaluating rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.","authors":"Zhu Mei, Xin-Lu Bai, Dong-Mei Huang, Qiao-Lin Zhang, Ling Yan","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to assess whether rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood culture bottles for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be used in Chinese hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rapid AST was performed on each positive blood culture bottle. Categorical rapid AST results at 8 to 10 and 16 to 18 hours were compared with those from the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux). Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameter were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard M100-S34, published in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 8 to 10 hours, the overall categorical agreement for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa was 99.1%, 98.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. At 16 to 18 hours, these rates were 97.4%, 98.9%, and 99.1%, respectively. For E coli, the categorical agreement ranged from 97.2% (ceftazidime at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ampicillin and meropenem at 8-10 and 16-18 hours and ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours). The categorical agreement for K pneumoniae varied from 96.5%with ceftazidime at 8 to 10 hours to 100% with meropenem and ciprofloxacin at 16 to 18 hours. For P aeruginosa, the categorical agreement ranged from 93.7% (meropenem at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CLSI rapid AST method is reliable for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmaf018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We sought to assess whether rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood culture bottles for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be used in Chinese hospitals.

Methods: Rapid AST was performed on each positive blood culture bottle. Categorical rapid AST results at 8 to 10 and 16 to 18 hours were compared with those from the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux). Minimum inhibitory concentrations and zone diameter were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard M100-S34, published in 2024.

Results: At 8 to 10 hours, the overall categorical agreement for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa was 99.1%, 98.4%, and 95.8%, respectively. At 16 to 18 hours, these rates were 97.4%, 98.9%, and 99.1%, respectively. For E coli, the categorical agreement ranged from 97.2% (ceftazidime at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ampicillin and meropenem at 8-10 and 16-18 hours and ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours). The categorical agreement for K pneumoniae varied from 96.5%with ceftazidime at 8 to 10 hours to 100% with meropenem and ciprofloxacin at 16 to 18 hours. For P aeruginosa, the categorical agreement ranged from 93.7% (meropenem at 8-10 hours) to 100% (ciprofloxacin at 16-18 hours).

Discussion: The CLSI rapid AST method is reliable for E coli, K pneumoniae, and P aeruginosa in Chinese hospitals.

评估中国医院直接从阳性血培养中检测大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的快速药敏试验
前言:我们试图评估直接从阳性血培养瓶中进行大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的快速药敏试验(AST)是否可以在中国医院使用。方法:对每个阳性血培养瓶进行快速AST检测。在8至10小时和16至18小时,比较VITEK 2系统(biomsamrieux)的分类快速AST结果。根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI) 2024年发布的M100-S34标准解释最小抑制浓度和带直径。结果:在8 ~ 10小时,大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的总体分类一致性分别为99.1%、98.4%和95.8%。在16 ~ 18小时,这些比率分别为97.4%、98.9%和99.1%。对于大肠杆菌,绝对一致性范围从97.2%(头孢他啶8-10小时)到100%(氨苄西林和美罗培南8-10和16-18小时,环丙沙星16-18小时)。头孢他啶对肺炎克雷伯菌的分类一致性从8至10小时的96.5%到16至18小时的美罗培南和环丙沙星的100%不等。对于铜绿假单胞菌,分类一致性从93.7%(美罗培南8-10小时)到100%(环丙沙星16-18小时)。讨论:CLSI快速AST法在中国医院检测大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信