A randomized prospective clinical study comparing wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) and spinal anesthesia in the surgical treatment of ankle fractures.

IF 1
Taha Kızılkurt, Mustafa Ozkaya, Berk Nimetoglu, Muhammed Oguzhan Albayrak, Mehmet Demirel, Nur Canbolat, Halil İbrahim Balcı
{"title":"A randomized prospective clinical study comparing wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) and spinal anesthesia in the surgical treatment of ankle fractures.","authors":"Taha Kızılkurt, Mustafa Ozkaya, Berk Nimetoglu, Muhammed Oguzhan Albayrak, Mehmet Demirel, Nur Canbolat, Halil İbrahim Balcı","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.82593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle fractures are common injuries that often require surgical intervention to restore proper alignment and stability. Traditional anesthesia methods, such as general and spinal anesthesia, may not be suitable for patients with significant comorbidities. The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique has emerged as a viable alternative, particularly for patients with cardiovascular or pulmonary conditions. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of WALANT and spinal anesthesia in the surgical treatment of ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized study included patients with bimalleolar fractures who underwent surgery between June 2022 and November 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the WALANT group (n=16) or the spinal anesthesia group (n=19). Preoperative demographic data, intraoperative parameters (including surgical time), and postoperative outcomes, such as pain scores assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores at 12 months postoperatively, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had similar demographic characteristics (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in operating room time between the groups (WALANT: 180.47 minutes vs. Spinal: 190.94 minutes, p=0.30). Postoperative pain, assessed using VAS scores at 12 and 24 hours, did not significantly differ between groups. Morphine consumption via PCA was also similar (WALANT: 19.57 mg vs. Spinal: 22.8 mg, p=0.291). At the 12-month follow-up, AOFAS scores were similar between groups (WALANT: 80 vs. Spinal: 83.1, p=0.388). However, preoperative anxiety levels were higher in the WALANT group (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WALANT technique provides comparable postoperative pain control and functional outcomes to spinal anesthesia in ankle fracture surgery. Although preoperative anxiety was higher in the WALANT group, no significant differences were observed in postoperative pain or long-term recovery. WALANT represents a feasible and cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, especially in settings with limited access to anesthesiologists, such as during natural disasters or pandemics. It may be particularly advantageous for patients with cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities, helping to avoid the risks associated with systemic anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 6","pages":"570-576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.82593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ankle fractures are common injuries that often require surgical intervention to restore proper alignment and stability. Traditional anesthesia methods, such as general and spinal anesthesia, may not be suitable for patients with significant comorbidities. The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique has emerged as a viable alternative, particularly for patients with cardiovascular or pulmonary conditions. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of WALANT and spinal anesthesia in the surgical treatment of ankle fractures.

Methods: This prospective, randomized study included patients with bimalleolar fractures who underwent surgery between June 2022 and November 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the WALANT group (n=16) or the spinal anesthesia group (n=19). Preoperative demographic data, intraoperative parameters (including surgical time), and postoperative outcomes, such as pain scores assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores at 12 months postoperatively, were evaluated.

Results: Both groups had similar demographic characteristics (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in operating room time between the groups (WALANT: 180.47 minutes vs. Spinal: 190.94 minutes, p=0.30). Postoperative pain, assessed using VAS scores at 12 and 24 hours, did not significantly differ between groups. Morphine consumption via PCA was also similar (WALANT: 19.57 mg vs. Spinal: 22.8 mg, p=0.291). At the 12-month follow-up, AOFAS scores were similar between groups (WALANT: 80 vs. Spinal: 83.1, p=0.388). However, preoperative anxiety levels were higher in the WALANT group (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The WALANT technique provides comparable postoperative pain control and functional outcomes to spinal anesthesia in ankle fracture surgery. Although preoperative anxiety was higher in the WALANT group, no significant differences were observed in postoperative pain or long-term recovery. WALANT represents a feasible and cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, especially in settings with limited access to anesthesiologists, such as during natural disasters or pandemics. It may be particularly advantageous for patients with cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities, helping to avoid the risks associated with systemic anesthesia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项比较全清醒局麻无止血带(WALANT)和脊髓麻醉在踝关节骨折手术治疗中的随机前瞻性临床研究。
背景:踝关节骨折是一种常见的损伤,通常需要手术干预来恢复其正确的排列和稳定性。传统的麻醉方法,如全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉,可能不适合有明显合并症的患者。广泛清醒局部麻醉无止血带(WALANT)技术已成为一种可行的替代方案,特别是对于心血管或肺部疾病的患者。本研究旨在比较WALANT与脊髓麻醉在踝关节骨折手术治疗中的临床效果。方法:这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了2022年6月至2023年11月期间接受手术的双踝骨折患者。患者被随机分为两组:WALANT组(n=16)和脊髓麻醉组(n=19)。评估术前人口统计学数据、术中参数(包括手术时间)和术后结果,如使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛评分、患者自控镇痛(PCA)吗啡用量以及术后12个月美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分。结果:两组人口学特征相似(p < 0.05)。两组间手术时间无显著差异(WALANT: 180.47分钟vs脊柱:190.94分钟,p=0.30)。术后疼痛,在12和24小时用VAS评分评估,组间无显著差异。通过PCA的吗啡用量也相似(WALANT: 19.57 mg vs. Spinal: 22.8 mg, p=0.291)。在12个月的随访中,各组之间的AOFAS评分相似(WALANT: 80 vs脊柱:83.1,p=0.388)。然而,术前焦虑水平在WALANT组较高(p=0.001)。结论:在踝关节骨折手术中,WALANT技术提供了与脊髓麻醉相当的术后疼痛控制和功能结果。尽管术前焦虑在WALANT组中较高,但术后疼痛和长期恢复方面没有观察到显著差异。WALANT是传统方法的一种可行且具有成本效益的替代方法,特别是在自然灾害或流行病期间麻醉师接触有限的环境中。对于有心血管或肺部合并症的患者尤其有利,有助于避免全身麻醉相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信